Skip to main content
Response to consultation on RTS on home-host cooperation under PSD2
Go backQuestion 1: Do you consider the objectives of the RTS as identified by the EBA to be appropriate and complete? If not, please provide your reasoning.
The directive conflate Payments as a part of Banking and consumer Payments. The latter needs entirely different APIs.
https://github.com/cyberphone/saturn/blob/master/PSD2.md#purpose-of-psd2Question 2: Do you agree with the proposed framework for cooperation and the standardised forms specified in Articles 2 to 8 and Annexes 1 to 4? If not, what other ways of cooperation would you consider more efficient?
No opinionQuestion 3: Do you agree with the proposed framework for notifications of infringements and suspected infringements specified in Article 8 and Annex 4? If not, how should this be done?
No opinionQuestion 4: Do you consider that the approach proposed in Article 10, which gives the host CA discretion to require reporting either from all payment institutions or a characteristic subset thereof, is methodologically robust?
No opinionQuestion 5: Do you consider that payment institutions will be able to report the data specified in Article 10 and Annex 5? If not, what obstacles do you see and how could these obstacles be overcome?
No opinionQuestion 6: Do you consider that payment institutions should and will be able to report the data specified in Article 11 and Annex 6? If not, what obstacles do you see and how could these obstacles be overcome?
No opinionPlease select which category best describes you and/or your organisation
[Other "]"If you selected "Other", please provide details
Technloogy Provider/DeveloperName of organisation
WebPKI.org
