Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Retail exposures of subsidiary / branch of an EU credit institution established outside the EU

Could the subsidiary / branch of an EU credit institution established outside the EU use local criteria (i.e. criteria widely used by credit entities and public bodies in the relevant foreign jurisdiction) to classify an undertaker as a small or medium-sized enterprise in order assign to its exposures a risk weight of 75% according to Article 123?Could the subsidiary / branch of an EU credit institution established outside the EU use local criteria (i.e. criteria widely used by credit entities and public bodies in the relevant foreign jurisdiction) to classify an undertaker as a small or medium-sized enterprise in order assign to its exposures a risk weight of 75% according to Article 123?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4590
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2020

Requirement on the use of a Qualified Certificate for Electronic Seals (QSealC) for integrity and authenticity

Please clarify  whether in the EBA’s Opinion on the use of eIDAS under the RTS on SCA and CSC, under Paragraph 11, Qualified Electronic Seals employing a Qualified Seal creation Device are required to provide integrity and authenticity through the reference to Article 35(2) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4586
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/06/2019

Provisions as part of the own funds

Can provisions that are made against loss events in the past (i.e. previous accounting periods) be used as a capital substitute to cover future losses? Are these provisions available with a high degree of certainty?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4583
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Clarification on the reporting of "maturing" columns in COREP ALMM C 70.00 "Roll-over of funding"

In the "Maturing" columns of C 70 .00, do we have the option of reporting in two different ways? We can either report "Maturing" amounts according to all liabilities contractually withdrawable by the providers of funding for each day of the month. Or we can report only the amounts "Maturing" which are due on the relevant day.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4581
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/07/2020

Treatment for the intragroup derivative liabilities in the methodology to calculate ex-ante annual contributions to the Single Resolution Fund

Are there any provisions preventing to apply the same treatment for the intragroup derivative liabilities and for the other derivative liabilities as mentioned in Paragraph 4 of Article 5 of Delegated regulation (EU) 2015/63 ?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 - DR on ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements
  • ID: 2019_4577
  • Topic: Resolution financing arrangements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Surcharging

Is a ‘foreign exchange margin’ or 'currency conversion fee'  different from a ‘surcharge’ and do different foreign exchange margins above the ECB mid-market rate not constitute a surcharge?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4576
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Traitement des REPOs assortis d'une option "d'early termination" glissante dans le C70.00 - Handling of REPOs with a rolling ‘early termination’ option in C70.00

Comment matérialiser les REPO EVERGREEN & OPEN REPO dans le C70.00 ?How can EVERGREEN REPOs & OPEN REPOs be reported in the C70.00 template?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2019_4574
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/07/2020

Immediate Refund by the Payment Service Provider of unauthorised SEPA Direct Debit transactions after 8 weeks.

Our question is related to ‘unauthorised’ transactions, and as from when it is qualified as unauthorised? Is this as soon as any payment service user claims that the transaction is unauthorised?   -Or is this as soon as the payment service provider analysed if the transaction is really unauthorised?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4573
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Market Risk Swap as credit derivative (i.e. Total Return Swap) applied for reducing market risk capital requirements

Can the financial contract described below (“Market Risk Swap”, MRS) be regarded a credit derivative (i.e. Total Return Swap, TRS) and be applied for reducing market risk capital requirements?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4572
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Eligibility Criteria for Tier 2 Capital in light of the replacement of LIBOR/EURIBOR

1. If the replacement reference rate proposed in the context of a change to a different benchmark rate, such as in the context of LIBOR transition, could result in a greater credit spread on an own funds instrument, whether as a consequence of a one-off adjustment to the credit spread at the time the replacement reference rate is implemented or as a consequence of an agreement to reset the credit spread at any future date or dates (whether or not in the context of any call option dates), would this potential outcome be considered to be a feature that provides an incentive to redeem for the purposes of Article 63(h) CRR? 2. If the replacement interest rate proposed by an issuer for its LIBOR-linked floating rate Tier 2 own funds instruments is a rate which is based on the credit standing of the issuer or its parent undertaking (or any intermediate parent undertaking), for example through the credit spread incorporated within a coupon derived from an overnight, or averaged overnight, risk-free rate, would that replacement rate of interest result in those instruments failing to satisfy the criterion specified in Article 63(m) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4568
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/02/2022

Exemptions from Strong Customer Authentication (SCA): credit transfers

Can the exemption under Article 15 of the RTS on SCA be applied to credit transfers between a personal account and a business account held by the same person.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4564
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 19/06/2020

Reporting of contributions to the default fund of a CCP

There seems to be an incoherence between Q&A 2013_209 and the instructions contained in Annex 2 of EBA Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 regarding the Reporting of contributions to the default fund of a CCP.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4563
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/05/2020

SCA profiles and multiple-use of devices

Can multiple users use the same device (i.e. smartphone) and have different strong customer authentication (SCA) profiles on the same device?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4560
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 25/09/2020

Speculative immovable property financing definition with respect to debt-for-asset swaps

In the case described below, in individual level of reporting, should exposures to the SPVs be treated as "Speculative Immovable Property Financing" and be risk weighted at 150% under Article 128 of the CRR, or should they be RW at 100% which reflects the RW of the property included in the Consolidated level of reporting (intercompany balances are eliminated and the asset remaining in the consolidated balance sheet is the property held for sale)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4559
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Definition of payee for dynamic linking

Article 5 of the RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication requires the authentication code to be specific to the amount of the payment transaction and the payee.Does it suffice to include a meaningful part of the identifier into the calculation of the authentication code? For instance, would it suffice to include only numeric characters of the IBAN in the calculation of the authentication code?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4556
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/12/2019

COREP V2.8 - C32.02 - Prudent Valuation : Fall back Approach

Should the detail of fair value adjustments for the Core approach be reported in the information for the fall back approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4555
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/04/2021

Control v6363_m - Number of days of the prudent exit period ?

Could you confirm that this control must be deleted or that the number of days is more or equal to zero (and not ten) ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4553
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 20/01/2022

Reporting of template C71.00 by significant currency

How is template C71.00 (concentration of counterbalancing capacity by counterparty) to be completed in the context of the reporting by significant currency (as referred to in Article 415(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR))? Specifically, are exposures in a significant currency going to rise in the ranking when being reported by significant currency (given that items denominated in a different currency will be disregarded in the separate currency reporting)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4550
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/09/2019

Classification of multilateral development banks (MDBs) for the purpose of the reporting of the Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics (ALMM)

For the purpose of the reporting of the ALMM, are MDBs to be considered as financial counterparties, non-financial corporate counterparties or other counterparties?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4549
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/09/2019