Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Determination of the total deposit balance of "all the client's deposit accounts"

Assuming a natural person has a bank account at a bank as a private individual. At the same time the individual is a (co)-owner of a legal entity, which qualifies as an SME, and the legal entity has a business account at the same bank. Shall the accounts of both the private individual and the legal entity be aggregated when checking the total deposit balance against the threshold of EUR 500,000? If so, how would the bank determine the appropriate share of the account balance of the legal entity (SME) if the individual is only a co-owner (e.g. 100%, 50%, etc.)?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2022_6460
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/01/2023

Embedded Derivatives under Art 24 (1) CRR versus Art 104 (3)

Can an institution be compliant with Art 24 (1) CRR, if embedded derivate and its host contract treated independently pursuant to Art 104 (3) Second Subparagraph of Proposal for amending CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6459
  • Topic: Accounting and auditing
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/07/2022

Validation rule v4135_m

As we are asked not to report the repos at fair value in the “Repurchase agreements” item on P01.02, while also explicitly required to report MRO, LTRO & TLTRO operations in P02.02, we believe this validation rule cannot be complied with.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2019/05 – Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions under Recommendation A4 of ESRB/2012/2 - repealing EBA/GL/2014/04
  • ID: 2022_6457
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Funding Plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/10/2022

Early redemption options

Would an early redemption option exercisable by the holder of the instrument cause such instrument to be ineligible altogether or would it merely result in its maturity being deemed shortened in accordance with Article 72c(2)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6456
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/07/2022

v6566_s, v6567_s, v6327_m: FV changes of hedged items in portfolio hedge of IRR

Should the warnings from EBA validation rule v6566_s be maintained for data point {C 32.01, r0120, c0010}? And what about EBA validation rule v6327_m for C 32.01, r0120? Consistently, should EBA validation rule v6567_s be amended to exclude rows 0010, 0020 and 0120 from the check?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6455
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 14/06/2023

Scope of Prudential consolidation

Which is the applicability of Article 22 CRR for successive subsidiaries of a Significant Institution (SI) in the SSM and rest of EU, when the subsidiary in a third country as referred in Article 22 CRR is held by the subsidiary in the SSM or rest of the EU that is the last in the chain of the successive subsidiaries of the SI?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6454
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:

PD calibration sample

Given the definition of PD calibration provided in EBA/GL/2017/16 section 2.4 paragraph 8, and the requirements for the calibration sample provided in section 5.3.5, paragraph 88 of the same guidelines, for developing a TTC model, clarification is needed on the expectation on the implementation of the back-testing performed in the validation phase: Shall the back-testing at portfolio level verify that the average PD over historical observation period is aligned with LRA DR or, instead, shall the comparison be made between PD estimates current at the validation date and the LRA DR? Does it change according to the rating philosophy? Shall the back-testing always be performed on a 1-year validation sample, regardless the type of TTC calibration philosophy and regardless the length of the calibration sample? How shall the rating philosophy be taken into consideration when assessing the outcome of back-testing at grade level? Provided that the main aim of the calibration is to reflect the LRA DR, is the any case where the alignment to 1-year default rate should get a higher weight in validation assessment, although in a TTC calibration philosophy?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/16 - Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
  • ID: 2022_6453
  • Topic: Model validation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/01/2023

Mismatch between the instructions for template C 07.00 and the EBA validation rule (v4755_m)

Should Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2021/451 be amended in a way to remove the mismatch between the instructions for reporting template C 07.00 and the EBA validation rule (v4755_m)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6452
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/10/2022

Incorrect Mapping Between Pillar III Template EU CR6-A and Corep Template C 08.07

Should the Mapping Tool for Template EU CR6-A (Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/637) be amended in a way for Template EU CR 6-A r3,2 to match with COREP Template {C 08.01, r 0080} (SPECIALIZED LENDING SLOTTING APPROACH: TOTAL) instead of COREP Template {C 08.07, r0070}?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/11 - Guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of CRR
  • ID: 2022_6451
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 30/01/2023

Defining the risk factor for third-country investment firms in K-TCD calculation

Should the third-country investment firms be classified as investment firms or other counterparties for the purposes of defining the risk factor per counterparty type pursuant to Article 26 IFR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6450
  • Topic: K-factor requirements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 09/06/2023

Valuation of ASA: financial instruments with a negative fair value

What should be the treatment of the financial instruments with a negative fair value for the purposes of the measurement of client financial instruments safeguarded and administered (ASA)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6449
  • Topic: K-factor requirements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2022

Query – Article 262 of CRR

With respect to Article 262 of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2401, we would like to ask whether an institution which calculates risk-weighted exposure amounts under the Standardised Approach (SEC-SA) of Article 261, should apply p=0.5 in all securitisation positions (junior, mezzanine and senior) or such p value should only be applied in the senior securitisation position.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2022_6448
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/07/2022

COREP reporting in case of positive impairments for purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (POCI)

In case of purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (POCI), also positive values for value adjustments can be reported in COREP reports. Some DPM validation rules do not allow reporting positive values. Since it is possible to have positive impairments for the POCI assets, could the validation rule be modified in this respect?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6447
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/10/2022

Reporting of certain COREP templates by entities with deviating accounting year end

Can the reference dates for reporting COREP templates C 08.03 to C 08.07, C 34.07 and C 34.11 be adjusted for an accounting year-end which deviates from the calendar year, considering that they reflect disclosure obligations subject to Article 433 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6444
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/06/2023

Taxonomy 3.0 Validation Rule v3900_s

Our query refers to the EBA v3900_s validation rule of template F 02.00, which despite being non-blocking, we have to justify the module as there are negative amounts. We understand that there may be situations in which the reversal of expenses or income for interests or commissions of the current exercise exceed the expenses or income of the same period. In this situation a negative quantity should be allowed to be reported.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6445
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/03/2023

Reporting outflows from covered bonds and asset-backed securities in COREP template C 73.00

In which row of template C 73.00 should institutions report the outflows from debt securities such as covered bonds or asset-backed securities issued by the reporting institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6443
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 18/04/2023

Equity exposures and other non-credit obligation assets in C 08.07

Should the values in column 0010 of COREP template C 08.07 for rows 0150 (Equity) and 0160 (Other non-credit obligation assets) be reported, which are not in scope of Article 166 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2022_6442
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/04/2023

v6298_m

A new validation v6298_m has been added to taxonomy DPM 3.2 which specifies that: [C 24.00,{c140} ({r0010} <= 30)]. This rule has severity 'error' and provides that no more than 30 "Number of overshootings (during previous 250 working days)" can be reported. Article 366, par. 2, requires that "addend shall depend on the number of overshootings for the most recent 250 business days as evidenced by the institution's back-testing of the value-at-risk number as set out in Article 365(1)". This paragraph does not indicate any maximum limit of "Number of overshootings " and the column "Number of overshooting" of the table 1 of art 366 has as last range "10 or more". The indications of Article 366 are consistent with the validation rules v6297_m (whit sererity warning) which specifies that : [C 24.00 ({c140} {r0010} <= 250)] but not with rule v6298_m that provides a cap on 30 Number of overshooting.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2022_6440
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/10/2022