Question ID
2026_7722
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Credit risk
Article
111
Paragraph
2
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
Not applicable
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Assigning risk-weight to a credit facility where the drawdown is contingent on non-credit risk related conditions that are required to be met by the obligor prior to any initial or subsequent drawdown and where the conditions for the drawdown are not met.
Question

What risk-weight should be assigned to a credit facility where the drawdown is contingent on non-credit risk related conditions that are required to be met by the obligor prior to any initial or subsequent drawdown and where the conditions for the drawdowns are not met per the reporting date?

Background on the question

CRR article 5(10) defines that commitments include arrangements where there are conditions that are required to be met by the obligor prior to any initial or subsequent drawdown. Meaning the contingent credit facility should be reported as a commitment and risk-weighted according to CRR article 111(2). 
The obligor is a corporation that does not fulfil requirements for SME or retail classification. The arrangement does not fulfil the conditions for 0% risk-weight in CRR article 5(10)(a-e). The arrangement does not fulfil the requirements for being unconditionally cancellable (UCC). 
The arrangement consists of a credit facility of 5.000.000 CU where the drawdown is contingent on certain non-credit risk related conditions such as financial targets for profitability and securing the proper licenses to operate from local authorities. When the conditions are met, the obligor has the right to, within the maturity, drawdown the full amount of the credit facility at their discretion. 

Submission date
Rejected publishing date
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in the regulatory framework, which is sufficiently clear and unambiguous. In particular, the matter raised in the Q&A can be clearly inferred from Article 5(10) of the CRR, read in conjunction with Annex I.

Status
Rejected question