- Question ID
-
2025_7508
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Credit risk
- Article
-
Article 111
- Paragraph
-
4
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Not applicable
- Type of submitter
-
Individual
- Subject matter
-
Treatment of Subscription Agreements in CIUs as Off-Balance Sheet Item
- Question
-
Clarification is sought on the prudential treatment of subscription agreements entered into for the acquisition of units in Collective Investment Undertakings (CIUs), specifically in the context of off-balance sheet exposures under Article 111(4) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). More specifically, clarification is sought on the treatment of subscription agreements upon signing of the relevant documentation but which effects, at the time of signing, is subject to the verification of conditions precedent (these conditions normally being out of the control of the subscriber) such as the relevant fund reaching a certain size.
- Background on the question
-
Typically, institutions may sign subscription agreements whereby they express their intention to acquire units in CIUs. However, the actual obligation to subscribe the units is conditional upon the satisfaction of several conditions precedent—such as regulatory approvals or the achievement of certain fund-related thresholds—that are outside the institution’s control. As a result, at the moment of signing, the institution has limited or no discretion over the fulfillment of these conditions, and the obligation to fund the subscription does not yet arise. The institution is, however, upon verification of those conditions precedent (which verification is normally outside the institution's control), obliged to subscribe the units in the relevant CIU.
In this context, clarification is sought on the interpretation of whether said subscription agreements should be treated as off-balance sheet commitments under Article 111(4) CRR. In particular:
- Can these agreements be considered “contractual arrangements offered by an institution, but not yet accepted by the client” as described in Article 111(4)?
- If so, would the fact that the obligation to subscribe is contingent on conditions outside the institution’s control affect the classification as a commitment for capital requirement purposes?
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
EBA guidance or clarification is not needed
- Status
-
Rejected question