Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2023_6699 Inflows or outflows on open SFT in the LCR computation
Question ID
2023_6699
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Liquidity risk
Article
412
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
Article/Paragraph
32, 28
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Inflows or outflows on open SFT in the LCR computation
Question

Considering the LCR scenario, which sets out a loss of value of collateral within the LCR horizon, should inflows on open reverse repos and outflows on open repos be accounted for in the LCR at the first date of renegociation, when this date falls within the LCR horizon?

Background on the question

Open SFTs are short duration products with an operational facility for unilateral or bilateral renegotiation at the discretion of either party or the two contracting parties. They have no set maturity, but will, for operational fluidity purposes, be renegotiated every business day (in terms of rate, size, collateralization or terminations, which is up to each party) and if necessary revalued according to the market parameters at the date. They are mainly used when a market player has a specific need (such as a short hedge for a market-maker whose position is likely to change constantly) and cannot commit to a long-term contract.

Open SFT aim above all to avoid costly daily manual re-entries and the associated operational risks for these products, which carry very large volumes. Thus, every day, as long as the two counterparties still agree on the terms of the transaction, the transaction is automatically renewed in the same conditions. If not, the transaction is either closed, or is subject to a rebalancing of the collateral and potentially to a revision of the remuneration conditions.

According to the LCR scenario (art.5(e) of the Delegated Act : “increased market volatility affecting the value of collateral or its quality or creating additional collateral needs”), collateral used in such open SFT necessarily cater for a decrease in value, equal to the regulatory haircut : there is no loss of value for HQLA L1 securities, a partial haircut is applied to L2A/L2B securities, while non-HQLA securities face a total loss.

In this perspective, in a LCR-type liquidity stress scenario, at each renegotiation date within the LCR horizon, such transaction results either in a termination or in a roll with additional collateral. Consequently, a cash flow should mechanically be accounted for to reflect the loss of value of the collateral attached to these products.

Pursuant to Q&A 2021_6163, we understand that the EBA takes a different stance and rules that inflows on open reverse repos not formally recalled within the 30-day horizon of the LCR and contingent on an option to trigger the liquidity flow, should not be computed in the LCR.

Submission date
27/01/2023
Rejected publishing date
28/03/2023
Rationale for rejection

 

This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has been answered in Q&A 6163.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive