Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Taxonomy 4.0: The validation rules v7538_m and v7546_m perform consistent cross-checks?

In terms of Implementing Technical Standards (ITS), when checking the rules of the COREP_OF module for Tables C_08.01.a, C_08.02, C_09.02 have been detected inconsistencies in the validation rules under template C09.02 cross check part. It’s possible to verify this?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7432
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Risk weighting attributed to gold in the form of a commodity

Is the definition of 'gold bullion', as recently amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1623, consistent with the previous definition of 'gold' under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), as clarified by EBA Q&A 2016_3011, in the sense that it includes all forms of gold commodities (such as bars, ingots, jewels, manufactured products, and coins) whose value is determined exclusively by gold content—defined by purity and mass—regardless of their form, provided that no numismatic, artistic, branding, or other extrinsic value is attributed?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7423
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 01/05/2025

Clarification on Risk Weight Assignment for ADC Exposures in Default

Could you please clarify what risk weight should be applied to ADC exposures that are in default?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7419
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 21/05/2025

Reporting framework 4.0 Validation rules

Could you please confirm whether validation rule v23722_m is incorrect and should be amended, as it only counts time buckets greater than 7 years, which appears inconsistent with the ITS requirements?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7418
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Reporting framework 4.0 Validation rules release (new format) (Uploaded on 19/12/2024)

Could you please confirm whether validation rule e4900_n is incorrect and should be amended by removing r0190 from the rule and validation rule v0313_m is incorrect and should be amended by adding r0210 to the rule?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7417
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_08.01.a,C_09.02 - v1672_m

The validation rule formula v1672_m specifies that the Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) after supporting factor in column 0125 reported under form 09.02 for IRB exposure class corporates – purchased receivables of all country should be equal to RWA reported under form C_08.01.a, column 0260 where Sheet is in qAE:qx2075 (Corporates - Purchased receivables with own estimates of LGD or conversion factors). The Sheet qAE:qx2076 (Corporates - Purchased receivables without own estimates of LGD or conversion factors) should also be considered in the formula for comparison of exposure to corporates – purchased receivables (with and with-out own estimates of LGD or conversion factors). This Sheet qAE:qx2076 is also a part of validation rules v0435_m, v0436_m and v0438_m where a similar comparison is made for original exposure, Exposure at Default (EAD) and RWA pre supporting factor. The control seems incoherent. Can you please confirm the sheets which need to be included for comparison of corporates – purchased receivables between forms C_08.01.a and C_09.02?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7409
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_08.01.a,C_09.02 - v0418_m

The validation rule formula v0418_m specifies that the Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) reported under form 09.02 for IRB exposure class central governments and central banks of all country should be less than or equal to RWA reported under form C_08.01.a, column 0255 where Sheets are in qAE:qx2021 (Central governments and central banks with own estimates of LGD and/or conversion factors), qAE:qx2020 (Central governments and central banks without own estimates of LGD or conversion factors), qAE:qx2014 (Corporates - Specialised Lending without own estimates of LGD or conversion factors), qAE:qx2055 (Retail exposures - Purchased receivables - with own estimates of LGD or conversion factors). The Sheet qAE:qx2014 and qAE:qx2055 should not be considered in the formula for comparison of exposure to central government and central bank. These two sheet’s codes are also not part of validation rule v0415_m and v0416_m where the similar comparison is made for original exposure and Exposure at Default (EAD). The control seems incoherent.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7408
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Calculation of minimum lease payments in case of operational lease

Does the EBA acknowledge that the residual value should be discounted, or the interests on this residual value should be filtered out of the calculation of the discounted minimum lease payments, to avoid an increase of the exposure beyond the accounting value?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7393
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 21/05/2025

Multilateral development banks classification for the purpose of article 325ah

Buckets 2 and 11 of Table 4 in Article 325ah refer to the category of multilateral development banks (MDBs) and international organisations (IORGs) referred to in Article 117(2) or Article 118 of CRR. At the same time, paragraph 2 of the same article 325ah, requires the use of a classification that is commonly used in the market for grouping issuers by sector, in order to assign a risk exposure to a sector.  Assuming that such a market wide accepted classification would show a certain counterparty as an MDB, as long as this specific counterparty is not listed in the above listed articles mentioned for buckets 2 and 11 of Table 4 in Article 325ah (as a one to one match) , then this counterparty would need to be assigned to a different bucket, likely 4 or 13.  Can there be a departure from the specific list of MDBs and IORGs, as referred to in Article 117(2) or Article 118 of CRR, for the purpose of Table 4 in Article 325ah of CRR? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7391
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:

Application of formulae v23061_m on r0180

Could you please confirm that the formulae v23061_m needs to be modified and should apply to all rows except r0180?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7385
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

currencies Lithuanian Litas and Croatian Kuna

In C 22.01 the currencies Lithuanian Litas and Croatian Kuna are still available in the Annotated templates, while removed from C_2024_8389_1_ANNEX_EN_V3_P1_3682615.XLSX, which was published after the Annotated templates. Can we assume these 2 currencies should be removed?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2025_7384
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Financial Conglomerates: Mismatch between ITS and DPM 3.5 – ID v22748_u - T1 L 06.00, column c0020.

We are seeking clarification about a possible mismatch between ITS and DPM 3.5 (ID v22748_u - T1 L 06.00, column c0020) as part of the compilation of the template FC.06 Template - “Risk Concentration - Exposure by counterparties" within the FiCod. supervisory reporting. The Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 of 14 December 2022 states that, within the Template FC.06 - “Risk Concentration - Exposure by counterparties", the exposures must be reported for each individual legal entity belonging to the financial conglomerate, whereas the DPM 3.5 only permit reporting a unique value of the identification code of the external counterparty. This also determines the impossibility of representing separately the exposures held towards the same external counterparty but denominated in different currencies. We therefore ask what is the correct way to represent - inside the FC.06 Template- the cases in which multiple entities belonging to the conglomerate have exposures towards the same external counterparty and for the cases in which, for each external counterparty, there are exposures denominated in different currencies.

  • Legal act: Directive 2002/87/EC (FiCoD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 – ITS on the reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration for financial conglomerates
  • ID: 2025_7381
  • Topic: Financial conglomerates
  • Date of submission:

v7364_m

Is v7364_m complying with the CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2025_7380
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

SME

In the instructions for Finrep ITS consolidated - Annex V to EU Regulation 2021/451 - there is a definition of SME in point 5.i ‘SME’: micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Commission Recommendation C(2003)1422 (6); (Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (C(2003)1422) (OJ L 124, 20/05/2003, p. 36), where in article 1: “Enterprise An enterprise is considered to be any entity engaged in an economic activity, irrespective of its legal form. This includes, in particular, self-employed persons and family businesses engaged in craft or other activities, and partnerships or associations regularly engaged in an economic activity.” In accordance with the above-mentioned recommendation and SME definition, the scope  of enterprises also includes self-employed individuals. Given that SME are reported in FINREP ITS as enterprises,  should self-employed entrepreneurs be treated as enterprises as well?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2025_7379
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 22/05/2025

Calculation of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer

Clarification  to EBA Q&A 2016_3050 and CRM techniques with substitution effects How do we have to consider CRM techniques with substitution effects on the exposure in the CCB?

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7377
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/05/2025

Recognition of non-transferable liquidity held by and arising in third country subsidiaries in the context of the calculation of the consolidated LCR

What is the (combined) treatment of liquid assets held by and liquidity inflows arising in third country subsidiaries being subject to transfer restrictions for the purpose of the calculation of the LCR at consolidated level?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2025_7375
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/03/2025

C_25.01.b Datapoint Modelling

The datapoint modeling for C_25.01.b does not align for rows 10 & 20 with that of C_25.01.a. The datapoint model for C_25.01.a lists (qAFF:qFI) Type of Financial Instruments while C_25.01.b does not. 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7371
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/05/2025

XBRL Modelisation of FICOD REPORTING L0600

It seems that the current modelisation L0600 only accepts as a dynamic dimension the column 0020 "identification code of the exernal counterparty" where the ITS states that :  -1) General ITS : "the aim is to list the significant exposure [...] by single counterparty outside the scope of the financial conglomerate. If more than one entity of the financial conglomerate is involved, for entity a separate line is necessary"  2) ITS L0600 - c0080 :  The name of the enity of the conglomate involved in the exposures. It concerns all entities and for each entity a separate entry has to be reported. If more than one entity of the conglomerate is invoved, for each entity a separate line is necessary.   So normally the report shoud have two key dynamisms a the row level : 0020 "identification code of the exernal counterparty" 0080 "Entity of the financial conglomerate' Can you confirm that with the current XBRL settings it's not possible to correctly submit the informations as expected by the ITS? Can you propose a workaround ?

  • Legal act: Directive 2002/87/EC (FiCoD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2025_7370
  • Topic: Financial conglomerates
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/04/2025

Correct classification of services related to the 'reselling' of software provided in SaaS mode

With reference to the correct identification of the type of ICT services, taking into account the types contained in ANNEX III of Regulation (EU) 2024/2956, how should services related to the 'reselling' of software provided in SaaS mode be classified?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/2956 - ITS on the register of information
  • ID: 2025_7367
  • Topic: Register of information (DORA)
  • Date of submission: