Question ID
2025_7432
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Article
147
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
Article/Paragraph
147
Type of submitter
Other
Subject matter
Taxonomy 4.0: The validation rules v7538_m and v7546_m perform consistent cross-checks?
Question

In terms of Implementing Technical Standards (ITS), when checking the rules of the COREP_OF module for Tables C_08.01.a, C_08.02, C_09.02 have been detected inconsistencies in the validation rules under template C09.02 cross check part. It’s possible to verify this?

Background on the question

For the validation rules v7538_m and v7546_m related to Corporates - Purchased receivables (qx2075/qx2076) cross template checking (C08.01 – C08.02 – C09.02), it was used into expression Corporates - Of Which: SME r0050 instead of r0057. This issue may lead to inconsistencies in the expression logic.

  • v7538_m: […] = sum({tC_09.02, r0050, c0010} [ where CEG = [eba_GA:x1] ] -  {tC_09.02, r0057, c0030} [ where CEG = [eba_GA:x1] ]) endif

  • v7546_m: […] = sum({tC_09.02, r0050, c0110} [ where CEG = [eba_GA:x1] ] -{tC_09.02, r0057, c0120} [ where CEG = [eba_GA:x1] ]) endif

Submission date
Rejected publishing date
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has already been identified and will be considered for a forthcoming version of the Reporting framework / release of the respective validation rules.

Status
Rejected question