Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

List of Q&A's

Pillar 3 Disclosure - EU OV1 – Row 1 ‘Credit risk (excluding CCR)’ mapping clarification

In Template EU OV1, Row 1 "Credit Risk (excluding CCR)", we observe that the current mapping includes the following components from C 02.00: {C 02.00, r0690, c0010} – Other risk exposure amounts minus {C 02.00, r0720, c0010} – Requirements for large exposures minus {C 02.00, r0755, c0010} – Additional RWEA for market risk imposed by supervisor (Art. 110) minus {C 02.00, r0770, c0010} – Additional RWEA for market risk minus {C 02.00, r0780, c0010} – Transitional RWEA for crypto assets (Art. 501d(2))   While this mapping appears to isolate the portion of "Other RWA" not related to market risk, large exposures, or crypto assets, our understanding is that the total reported in row 0690 may still include other risk exposure amounts arising from non-credit risk categories, such as CCR (e.g. RWA induced by IMM PMA). Given that Row 1 of EU OV1 is intended to reflect credit risk excluding CCR, we would like to confirm whether including the residual amount from r0690 (after the above deductions) is appropriate, or if this could lead to misclassification of non-credit risk RWA under credit risk.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Instructions to follow regarding new EBA Resolution Reporting

For the sake of clarity, the Bank reports below an example for the “Value of positions on proprietary and client accounts” of the difference between the two instructions 1.      SRB Guidance on FMIR: […] Daily average value at end of settlement day over the previous year. If not available, daily average value over a shorter time period and c0140 and c0150 should be filled. To calculate daily averages, please use the opening days of reported FMIs. If not available, you may use the TARGET2 opening days as a proxy. Total values should be included, not only values of relevant currencies as reported in c0120-c0170 2.      EBA Instructions on New Resolution Reporting – Z09.03: […] Average value at end of settlement day over the previous year.

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Structural Differences Between Annotated Table Layout and Taxonomy in GSIIDISPILLAR3 under DPM 4.1

Which representation (annotated table or taxonomy/XBRL) should be considered authoritative for defining the expected scope of data points for reporting? Should institutions follow the taxonomy-enabled structure and report values in cells that are greyed out in the annotated table, as shown in the sample XBRL file?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 1030/2014 - ITS on disclosure of values used to identify global systemically important institutions (as amended)

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_17.01

The formulae v23510_h seems not relevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_17.01

The formula of control v23509_h seems not relevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Justification to consider a ‘significant penalty’ and to be excluded from the outflows

Pursuant to article 25(4)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, does the cumulative loss of accrued interest, representing more than 50% of the total contractual interest income upon early withdrawal of term deposits (specifically those which have been active for more than 50% of their contractual term, have an original maturity longer than 30 days, and a residual maturity exceeding 30 days), constitute sufficient justification to consider this as a ‘significant penalty’ under article 25(4)paragraph (b), with the purpose of discouraging early withdrawal, and therefore allow such retail deposits (for which more  than 50% of contractual term has passed)  to be excluded from the outflows?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement

Guidance for credit institutions on which countries fall under scope of the Critical Function Report (CFR)

We currently do not see any indication for country-specific information. Will the EBA provide requirements on which countries are to be covered for each Critical Function Report?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on the provision of information for the purpose of resolution plans

Clarification on column a) "Total exposures", CR7-A Template

Could you please confirm that the coloumn a) "Total exposures" of CR7-A template should be filled with outstanding amount post application of credit conversion factor without taking into account any substitution effects due to the existence of a guarantee  in accordance with Articles 166 to 167 CRR, in case the exposure covered by only unfunded credit protection (guarantees)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/637 - ITS with regard to disclosures of information referred to in Titles II and III of Part Eight CRR

EBA Mapping Tool Clarification - EU MR3

Template EU MR3 - IMA values for trading portfolios (Row 4/8/12/16) According to the disclosure instruction (Annex XXX) & Article 455, MR3 will need to include related Internal Model Market Risk elements.  However, according to the EBA defined mapping for the above rows, which is mapped to C24.00, some IM elements (e.g. RNIME number) will be missed from the disclosure  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Application of the SME definition in specific cases

How shall the SME definition in Article 5(9) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) be applied in the following cases: 1. The entity is considered both in accounts on the consolidated basis of a group and also in accounts on a “sub-consolidated” basis only considering a sub-group of this group. 2. The entity is a single entity that prepares accounts on its individual basis but is not considered in any accounts for a “consolidated situation” of a group.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Exposures to EU exchanges

Should exposures to EU exchanges be treated as exposures to institutions, under articles 119, 120 and 121?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Loans collateralized by immovable property in F 05.01 and F 13.01

Do loans collateralized by immovable property in templates FINREP 05.01 and FINREP 13.01 need to comply with Articles 124 - 126 of the CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Treatment of Subscription Agreements in CIUs as Off-Balance Sheet Item

Clarification is sought on the prudential treatment of subscription agreements entered into for the acquisition of units in Collective Investment Undertakings (CIUs), specifically in the context of off-balance sheet exposures under Article 111(4) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). More specifically, clarification is sought on the treatment of subscription agreements upon signing of the relevant documentation but which effects, at the time of signing, is subject to the verification of conditions precedent (these conditions normally being out of the control of the subscriber) such as the relevant fund reaching a certain size.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Computation of the operational risk valuation adjustment after entry into force of Regulation - EU - 2024/1623

To comply with article 105, point (10) of CRR, and with article 17 of the Delegated Regulation  2016/101 we ask the following two questions:  Does the calculation of own funds requirements for operational risk in accordance with Title III of Part Three of CRR include operational risk relating to valuation processes? If the answer to the question above is yes, does the Delegated Regulation 2016/101 allow to avoid double counting of operational risk relating to valuation processes?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2016/101 - RTS for prudent valuation under Article 105(14) CRR

Credit Conversion Factor Treatment - Loan Participation Agreements in Unconditionally Cancellable Facilities

For loan participation arrangements where Bank A (the issuing bank) originates loans classified as unconditionally cancellable and applies 0% Credit Conversion Factor (CCF) under CRR Article 111, what is the appropriate CCF treatment for Bank B as the participating bank?Specifically, should Bank B apply:- a 0% CCF - consistent with the unconditionally cancellable nature of the underlying loans issued by Bank A- Standard CCF rates (20% or higher) - based on the participation agreement structure, where Bank B cannot directly exercise the unconditional cancellation rights?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 - RTS for Own Funds requirements for institutions

EBA Mapping Tool Clarification - EU OV1 & EU CMS1

With regards to the mapping logic used for EU OV1 & EU CMS1, in particularly for the Market Risk related rows, these currently reference the new FRTB related reporting templates with the C 90 series. As the implementation of FRTB is set to be delayed by a further year (refer to communication from the European Commission) until 1st January 2027, we believe that the mapping logic should be updated to reflect, referencing back to the pre-CRR3 Market Risk templates C18.00-C24.00, in addition to C02.00. In addition, we feel that in relation to EU OV1 template, the rows associated to Market Risk may require amendment to reflect the pre-CRR3 breakdown, unless the interim requirement is to mirror the approach to the of reporting (in C02.00), where data is reported under the Simplified standardised approach (S-SA) only.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

fully and completely secured by mortgages for the purpose of the deduction of non performing exposures

In the context of the CRR3 and the application of the deduction of non-performing exposure from Common Equity Tier 1 as per article 47c, we would like to clarify the requirements of “ fully and completely secured by mortgages” in order to determine the "secured part of a non-performing exposure".

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

In the absence of specific guidance in the Annex, the scope of the new column c0195 Transitional arrangements for UCCs in C_07.00 and the expected reporting of such UCCs throughout the transition phase remains unclear. For example, the Bank has a UCC with a nominal value of €100,000, all of which remains undrawn over the transition period 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2032. Please confirm that the exposure shall be consistently reported as €100,000 in c0195 throughout the transition period 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2032, as follows.  Reference Period Transitional Arrangement Art 495d (1) Factor Example: UCC with nominal value of €100,000 Exposure Value     c0195 c0200 2025-2029 0% 100,000 0 2030 25% 100,000 2,500 2031 50% 100,000 5,000 2032 75% 100,000 7,500 Whilst acknowledging the relevant validations v6364_m and v0307_m, the proposed rationale is based on the principle that the UCC is in its entirety subject to the transitional arrangements as from the reference period 2025.  Effectively, this implies that c0195 shall consist of the fully adjusted exposure value prior to the application of both the CCF and the transitional factor laid down in Article 495d. Such reporting would also ensure alignment with c0150 and the preceding columns.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

P3 Frequency of disclosure (Transparency and Pillar 3 | European Banking Authority) for reporting date 30-06-2025

When checking the P3 Frequency of disclosure table (Transparency and Pillar 3 | European Banking Authority) for reporting date 30-06-2025 we noticed that according to P3 Frequency of disclosure table (excel row 145_Disclosures on MREL/TLAC - Templates_with relevant article 15 with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilitie and point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR) bank "ABC" as "Large institutions (Listed and No GSII)" should publish P3-disclosure related to point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis. However, according to the article 15 of ITS with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities only institutions, that are G-SIIs or part of a G-SII and entities that are material subsidiaries of non- EU G-SIIs and that are not themselves resolution entities (subject to article to CRR Article 92a or 92b) shall make the disclosures set out in point (a) of Article 437a. So, we are experiencing some inconsistency between these 2 sources:  P3 Frequency of disclosure table (Transparency and Pillar 3 | European Banking Authority) vs article 15 of ITS with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities.  As mentioned above, bank "ABC" is identified as “Large institutions (Listed and no G-SII)” and does not meet the above-mentioned requirement of article 15 of ITS with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities only institutions and CRR article 437a as the bank is a ‘No G-SII’ entity. So, our initial conclusion is that bank "ABC" does not need to disclose information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis.  But in the above-mentioned P3 Frequency of disclosure table (Transparency and Pillar 3 | European Banking Authority) it does indicate that LARGE INSTITUTIONS (LISTED AND NO GSII), which bank "ABC" is, should provide information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis. Now, this caused us a little bit confusion and we are trying to find supporting regulations to verify the obligation for “Large institutions (Listed and no G-SII)” to provide information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis. Based on item 5a of article 9 ITS with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities only institutions we noticed that large institutions (so applicable for bank "ABC") are required to provide disclosures as referred to in Article 15, while Article 15 also describes that only entities that are subject to  Article 92a or 92b shall disclose information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis. So, our questions are: Should we read “Disclosures referred to in Article 15’ as mentioned in item 5a of article 9 ITS with regard to the public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities only institutions as “Disclosure of main features of own funds and eligible liabilities” and ignore the remaining part as this is not meant as “disclosure”? Is dVB as LARGE INSTITUTIONS (LISTED AND NO GSII) obliged to provide information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR on a semi-annual basis as prescribed in EBA’s template “Frequency of disclosures”? If bank "ABC" is obliged to disclose this on semi-annual basis, do we a have the choice to either disclose this qualitatively or quantitively by voluntarily providing both templates TLAC1 and TLAC3b, which are not required for LARGE INSTITUTIONS (LISTED AND NO GSII) on semi-annual basis, as the information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a, in accordance with 434a of CRR are already captured and included in these 2 existing templates? In EBA’s template “Frequency of disclosures” it is not precisely described how banks should disclose that. It does only mention that bank should provide information as set out in point (a) of Article 437a.     

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/763 – ITS with regard to the supervisory reporting and public disclosure of MREL

Data quality scans and connected data corrections as model changes

Has the implementation of data quality scans to be treated as a change of a rating system in accordance with art 142 I CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable