Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Regulated financial service

In case of a “regulated financial service” provided by a financial entity authorized / licensed / registered as financial entity to deliver that service, shall it be considered an ICT service in the meaning of DORA?  

  • Legal act: Directive 2022/2556/EU (DORA)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7246
  • Topic: Other DORA topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 18/02/2025

NACE sector K- 'Financial and insurance activities' in F 06.01

Can EBA confirm that Holding companies, as defined in ESA 2010, are out of scope of template F06.01? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7245
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/01/2025

Should repricing coupons be included in J06 sheets?

Should repricing coupons be included in J06 sheets in IRRBB reporting? EBA’s validation formula says that repricing coupons should not be included (validation rules v22320_m and v_22321_m). Otherwise the regulation (Final Draft RTS on Standardised Methodologies on IRRBB, Article 1, “’Notional repricing cash flow’ means: (c) Any interest payment on a part of the principal that has not yet been repaid or repriced) says that repricing coupons should be included. And if those repricing coupons are included (as the regulation says) it will cause validation rules v22320_m and v22321_m to be active because repricing notionals are always greater than the notional only.

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7244
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Application of recognised SyRB on a consolidated basis

May or shall a competent or a designated authority from a Member State, that recognises a systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State in accordance with Article 133 of the CRD, require its domestically authorised institutions to apply that rate on a consolidated basis, covering all exposures targeted by the recognised systemic risk buffer held through subsidiaries, branches or through cross-border lending, in accordance with Article 134 of the CRD ? Does the legal framework permit or require that exposures of domestically authorised institutions held through subsidiaries located in the Member State that sets the buffer rate as well as in other Member States are also included in the scope of recognition? 

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7242
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:

FINREP Template F01.01

We would like to seek clarification regarding the classification of repurchase agreements (repos) in the context of the FINREP reporting framework.Specifically, we am inquiring whether repurchase agreements with a maturity of less than or equal to one day, where the counterparty is a credit institution, can be reported under row 0040 (Other demand deposits) in report F01.01.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7241
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/02/2025

FINREP Templates F25 and F13

It has come to our attention that Form F25.01.a contains data elements that overlap with Form F13.3.1. For instance, F25.01.a Row 0120 Column 0030 shares data with F13.3.1a Row 0020 Column 0010. From a business perspective, this inclusion appears incongruous, and we would appreciate an explanation of the rationale behind this decision. Could you please provide the logic and reasoning for including this shared data element between Form F25 and Form F13?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7240
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Reporting Requirements on exposures subject to behavioural modelling

What is expected to be reported on the template J08.00b in terms of the perimeter of exposures included in the reporting of relevant parameters? Only those exposures actually subject to behavioural modelling by the institution (thus excluding exposures exposed to Prepayment, NMD behavioural modelling and Early Redemption Risks but non modelled by the institution) or all the exposures exposed to such risks, including those on which models are not applied?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7239
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Aggregated method for duration of derivatives

Could the EBA please clarify the expected method to aggregate and report the Duration value (column 0020) in template J 02.00 for derivatives?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7238
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

ESG P3 - Template 10 - Scope of disclosure and any relation to GAR related templates (Template 6, 7 and 8)

In Template 10, is the disclosure of the data identified at the counterparty / entity-level or data is identified at the exposure level? Can EBA help to also clarify when an exposure is reported in Template 10, would it be required for reporting in Template 6, 7 and 8 (only for the taxonomy aligned portion)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures
  • ID: 2024_7237
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 20/03/2025

Classification as a “specialised debt restructurer” pursuant to Article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013

To be classified as "specialised debt restructurer" (SDR), the institution’s sight deposits must not exceed 5% of the institution’s total liabilities. Within the context of the regulation, what is the appropriate interpretation of sight deposits when assessing if they meet the conditions from Article 36 (5) (f) of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7235
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/02/2025

Classification as a “specialised debt restructurer” pursuant to article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013

For how long prior to an institution’s classification as a specialised debt restructurer must all the criteria specified in article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013 be met by the institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7234
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/02/2025

Seniority categories to use when offsetting the gross JTD amounts of short exposures and long exposures within the DRC calculations for non-securitisations 

Which set of seniority categories shall be utilised and how should they be ranked as the basis for offsetting the gross JTD amounts of short exposures and long exposures within the DRC calculations for non-securitisations? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7233
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025

Vega general interest rate risk and credit spread risk factors

For credit instruments that include issuer-specific optionality, do both general interest rate vega and credit spread vega risk factors need to be considered as part of the SBM? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7232
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025

Basis of calculation for the DRC for non-securitisations and SBM-CSR for non-securitisations - instruments guaranteed by a guarantor

In the case of instruments guaranteed by a guarantor (such as guaranteed bonds), can that guarantor be used as the basis for calculating the DRC for non-securitisations and the SBM-CSR for non-securitisations? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7231
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025

Basis of calculation for the DRC for non-securitisations and SBM-CSR for non-securitisations – Individual ‘issuers’/‘obligors’ or ‘group of issuers/obligors’?

Do the calculations of the DRC for non-securitisations and SBM-CSR for non-securitisations have to be based on the individual ‘issuers’/‘obligors’, or could these calculations alternatively be based on the concept of a ‘group of issuers/obligors’ consisting of e.g. a conglomerate (and e.g. represented by an ‘ultimate parent’ corresponding to the ‘head of group’ or ‘parent company’)?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7230
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025

Conditions for increasing the margin period of risk (MPOR) used for the exposure value of netting sets with margin agreements.

Article 285 paragraph 3(b) references “OTC derivative that cannot be easily replaced”. By definition “OTC derivative” does not include listed / exchange trades derivatives.  The final sentence of paragraph 3 states “An institution shall consider whether trades or securities it holds as collateral are concentrated in a particular counterparty and if that counterparty exited the market precipitously whether the institution would be able to replace those trades or securities.” Is this is a clarification of 3(b) meaning that the reference to “replace those trades” would be in relation to OTC derivatives? Or alternatively is the reference to “replace those trades” broader than OTC derivatives?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7229
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/01/2025

Calculation of GAR - Template 8 of ESG Templates Pillar 3

How should we correctly compute the GAR (%) stock and flow?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/637 - ITS with regard to disclosures of information referred to in Titles II and III of Part Eight CRR
  • ID: 2024_7227
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/03/2025

ESG P3 - Template 1 - Reporting of column k (GHG emissions (column i): gross carrying amount percentage of the portfolio derived from company-specific reporting)

In Template 1, “column k (GHG emissions (column i): gross carrying amount percentage of the portfolio derived from company-specific reporting)”,  should the denominator used in the calculation of the percentage be: the gross carrying amount of exposures which GHG emissions are available or estimated  OR the gross carrying amount of all the exposures within the banking book portfolio regardless of whether the GHG emissions are available, estimated or not available (missing).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures
  • ID: 2024_7225
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:

Reporting of customer portfolios managed on a discretionary basis

According to Annex V, Part 2, paragraph 285 (a) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 (ITS): '‘'Asset management’ shall refer to assets belonging directly to the customers, for which the institution is providing management.” Since these assets belong to the customers, they are generally not recognized in the balance sheet of the credit institution. It is not clear however if the cash deposited by customers that the institution manages on a discretionary basis should be recognized as a liability. Additionally, if this account would have a negative balance, an asset might be recognized. 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7224
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/02/2025

Definition and scope of Asset Under Management

Are assets for which the investment firm provides generic advice services (outside of the MIFID authorisation scope)  to be included in the K-AUM calculation?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7223
  • Topic: K-factor requirements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/03/2025