- Question ID
-
2025_7343
- Legal act
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Topic
- Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
- Article
-
98
- Paragraph
-
5
- Subparagraph
-
a
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Regulation (EU) No 530/2014 - RTS on materiality of thresholds for internal approaches to specific risk in the trading book
- Article/Paragraph
-
Chapter 2 point 4
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Treatment of Net Interest Income Stress Outlier Test (NII SOT) in scenarios where breaches occur due to one-off effects (EBA/RTS/2022/10)
- Question
-
Could you please provide guidance on how banks should approach the reporting of such NII SOT breaches arising from such short-term, non-structural events and in addition how is it foreseen that the regulator should govern such cases? Specifically, are there any provisions or considerations that can be applied to account for these temporary effects without misrepresenting the bank's overall NII sensitivity?
- Background on the question
-
We are seeking clarification on the treatment of Net Interest Income Stress Outlier Test (NII SOT) in scenarios where breaches occur due to one-off effects which are not of structural nature, typically observed at the end of the financial year. Specifically, we are interested in understanding how such situations should be considered in the reporting stream and governed by the respective regulator.
Some examples of such one-off effects include:
- Yearly P&L Increase: This often occurs where dividend payments are scheduled for Q1 of the following year, resulting in a temporary increase in the P&L at year-end.
-
Customer Deposit Movements: Year end extraordinary Inflows and movements of customer deposits to current accounts with a zero external rate, which are generally short-term in nature.
Question is addressed in connection with point 4 of EBA/RTS/2022/10 - chapter 2 - Background and rationale.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in Article 4 and Article 5 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/856 of 1 December 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the supervisory shock scenarios, the common modelling and parametric assumptions and what constitutes a large decline. Further guidance has been provided also in the IRRBB heatmap implementation EBA/REP/2025/04.
The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts.
For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.
- Status
-
Rejected question