Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

List of Q&A's

Additional liquidity outflows corresponding to collateral needs resulting from the impact of an adverse market scenario.

Pursuant to Article 423(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, institutions are to add an additional outflow corresponding to collateral needs that would result from the impact of an adverse market scenario on the institution's derivatives transactions if material.  Should this be extended to include financing transactions if an outflow corresponding to collateral needs from the impact of an adverse market scenario is deemed material by an institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement

ANNUAL REPORT ON NEW ARRANGEMENTS ON THE USE OF ICT SERVICES

Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter V, Section I, Article 28, Paragraph 3, of the DORA Regulation, which states: “Financial entities shall report at least yearly to the competent authorities on the number of new arrangements on the use of ICT services, the categories of ICT third-party service providers, the type of contractual arrangements and the ICT services and functions which are being provided.,” we kindly request clarification on whether this provision requires a separate and specific communication in addition to the Register of Information, or whether the communication of such data is already fulfilled through the annual submission of the same Register, constituting a single compliance obligation. In the event that a separate communication is required in addition to the annual submission of the Register of Information, we kindly request clarification on the meaning of the term "categories of third-party ICT service providers" as mentioned in Chapter V, Section I, Article 28, Paragraph 3 of the DORA Regulation.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

COREP C35 - consistency controls v23722_m_0

The control claims that for C35.02 row r0120 column 0110 should be the sum of row r0080-r0100. If the control were to apply to line 0120, then the amounts reported in line 0120 columns 0010 to 0070 would not be included in the total of column 0110, which is inconsistent.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Payment account definition

Does an account provided by a payment service provider, linked to a payment instrument that can be used to make payment transactions to [certain] third parties (e.g. merchants) from that account, as well as to withdraw cash from that account (e.g. from an ATM) and receive incoming payments in the respective account from the same payment users to which the funds were transferred (i.e, refunds from merchants) fall under the definition of a payment account in accordance with PSD2, even if the respective account cannot receive funds from third parties via credit transfers?  

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

error in taxonomy

in COREP_OF template C_08.01.C cells r0070 c0130 and r0180 c130 seem to be common facts which in my opinion shouldn't be the case  how do we proceed from here?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Template 2: location of the collateral

Is it intentional to show the location of counterparty rather than the physical location of the property in question for Template 2 ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

CET1 buyback - sufficient certainty

Should CET1 buybacks be deducted from the CET1 capital from the moment the permission from the competent authority has been granted or from the moment the transaction has been announced?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 - RTS for Own Funds requirements for institutions

Transfer of banking business – presentation of transaction in FINREP movements tables

An application for approval of the legal merger of Bank A with Bank B has been submitted to the Central Bank of Cyprus. The legal merger will be completed in two steps, (i) the transfer of banking business of Bank B to Bank A via a transfer of business agreement, (ii) the merger of the two entities via a scheme of reorganisation. Following step (i) of the merger, Bank B will not maintain any activities or deposits and it will surrender its banking license. As such it will cease to be a credit institution and will temporarily obtain ~36% of Bank A through the transfer of business to Bank A (subject to regulatory approvals). The said legal merger is expected to be effective from 1 July 2025 onwards. The first FINREP report that will be prepared for the “merged” entity will be for reference date 30/09/2025. Given the transaction described above, how should we approach the FINREP tables that show movements (i.e. tables F12.01, F12.02, F18.01, F24.01, F24.02, F25.01& F 25.03)? In our view, the possible options are as follows: (i) Opening balances comprise of the sum of the opening balances of both entities (prior to the transaction) as at 01/01/2025. Additions/disposals/other movements during the reference period are again the sum of the additions/disposals/other movements of the two entities. As such the transfer of balances from Bank B to Bank A will not be explicitly shown. (ii) Amounts transferred from Bank B to Bank A form part of the inflows/additions of the “merged” entity, meaning the opening balances on the movements tables present the figures as presented by Bank A in its current reporting.  (iii) Opening balances will be shown as nil and all will be shown as “Inflows”, as if a new entity is set up.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Application of PSD2 provisions to the issuance and redemption of electronic money tokens

1) An EMI is acting solely as an issuer of EMTs ("EMTI") to its customers - crypto asset service providers (CASPs), these then provide the EMTs to their retail customers to be used for cryptoassets trading. EMTI does not maintain any fiat currency payment account for CASPs, nor provide any cryptocurrency services to them within the meaning of Articles 60(4) and 62 of the MICAR. Does the issuance of EMTs lead to a contractual relationship between the EMT holder (CASP, to whom the EMT is issued) and the EMTI within the meaning of PSD2 and EMD2? Is this contract passed on to the subsequent EMT holders who will acquire the EMTs from CASPs? 2) What is the legal nature of the acts of issuance and redemption of the EMTs?3) Which provisions of PSD2, if any, apply to issuance and redemption of the EMTs?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2023/1114 (MiCAR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) - Template Dimensions - Row 0130 / Column 0050

C 25.01 Data point intersecting Row 0130 (“Total non-centrally cleared SFTs that are fair-valued for accounting purposes, excluding exempted transactions” and Column 0050 (“Simplified treatment for derivative positions of CIU”) – we do not believe that the template dimensions are correct whereby SFTs are subset of derivatives.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)

C 02.00 - OWN FUNDS REQUIREMENTS (CA2) - Scope of Row 0690

Template C 02.00, row 690 et seq.: according to the mapping tool for CRR3_step1 provided within the consultation on public disclosure (EBA/CP/2023/38) this row is mapped to the template OV1, row 1 “credit risk”. To our understanding additional “other risk exposure amounts” reported in row 0690 et seq. could arise from all kinds of risk categories and are not limited to credit risk. More guidance about what is to be reported in row 0690 et. seq. is needed, especially what is to be reported in row 0760. Should this row be used for mandatory requirements by competent authorities? Should this row be used for risk exposure amounts which could by assigned to a risk category like credit risk or market risk?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)

C 02.00 - OWN FUNDS REQUIREMENTS (CA2) - CoRep S-TREA Allocation in Col 0020

C 02.00 – Row 690/ Col 0020 (Other RWA under S-TREA): If the firm were back testing any models that identified a shortfall, would this necessarily result in the equivalent Fully Standardised RWA needing to be computed, given that the fully standardised position would be driven by rule-based criteria, so in essence captured in the appropriate rows before Row 690 (risk types) already? In addition, for any regulator driven add-ons, again assume the same would be applied.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)

Whether the derogation under Article 119 (5) of CRR can be applied in the context of Article 395(1) of CRR

According to article 119 (5) of CRR, exposures to financial institutions shall be treated as exposures to institutions when calculating risk weighted assets for credit risk. Is article 119(5) applicable for the purpose of calculating large exposure limits in accordance with Article 395 of CRR? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_08.01.a

Does the validation rule v23372_m should be applied to column 0250?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

List of IEA Sectors in Column a vs List of IEA Sectors in the EBA3.3 Annotated Table Layout for ESG

The sector named "Chemicals" is listed in the Template 3: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Alignment metrics, but is missing from the List of NACE sectors to be considered. There is therefore no indication of the NACE codes to consider for Chemicals. The answer to question 2024_7085 confirms that institutions shall also present IEA sector Chemicals as one of the rows for Template 3, but doesn´t tell which NACE sectors are to be used. Which NACE codes should be considered for the sector of Chemicals?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_10.00

The formulae seems irrelevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_10.00

The formulae of the control seems irrelevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_10.00

The formulae of the control seems irrelevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_10.00

The formuale of the control seems irrelevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_10.00

The formulae of the control v23054_m seems irrelevant

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2024/3117 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions