EBA guidelines (EBA/GL/2021/17) on defining and reporting available financial resources for Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) under Directive 2014/49/EU – establishing harmonized rules for calculating target levels and reporting requirements to ensure transparency and compliance across EU member states.
EBA final guidelines on delineating and reporting available financial resources (AFRs) of deposit guarantee schemes (DGS) under Directive 2014/49/EU – harmonizing target level compliance, qualified AFR classification, and supervisory reporting obligations for EU authorities.
Presentation
EBA call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation – AFPDB submits feedback on retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and concerns over revised RTS for structured products, including performance scenarios and industry consultation gaps.
Allianz-Slovenská poisťovňa submits feedback to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and regulatory effectiveness in retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
Allianz SE’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, supporting transparency and comparability in retail investment products while advocating for consumer-tested improvements to the Key Information Document (KID) framework.
Amundi’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing its effectiveness, digital adaptation, and retail investor protection, while advocating for regulatory stability ahead of the 2022 exemption deadline for key information documents (KIDs).
EIOPA’s Insurance and Reinsurance Stakeholder Group provides advice to the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities on PRIIPs Regulation, addressing scope, disclosure simplification, and consumer understanding for insurance products.
ESMA Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (SMSG) response to ESAs on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, investor trust, digital media use, and proposed reforms for retail investor protection and transparency.
ACEPI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s effectiveness, challenges in structured products (e.g., autocallables, RIY), and proposed reforms for retail investor protection under the EU’s Capital Markets Union strategy.
Actuarial Association of Europe responds to EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, sanctions, and retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
AFEP, the French Association of Large Companies, submits feedback to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on corporate bond treatment, KID effectiveness, and retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
AFG’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, advocating for postponing major revisions until the 2022 revised Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) are implemented for UCITS and retail AIFs, citing limited industry experience and EU competitiveness concerns.
Assuralia’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, contributing insights on retail investor protection, KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and enforcement under the EU’s retail investment strategy review.
Austrian Federal Economic Chamber’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, emphasizing the need for a holistic, evidence-based approach, thorough consumer testing, and adequate implementation timelines for retail investment product disclosures.
BDV’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and enforcement under the EU’s retail investment strategy ahead of 2022 legislative proposals.
BETTER FINANCE submission to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, highlighting low retail investor satisfaction with Key Information Documents (KIDs), particularly on costs, performance, and risk disclosures, and advocating for Level 1 reforms to improve clarity and comparability of investment products.
BIPAR’s response to the European Supervisory Authorities’ call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s use, effectiveness, and adaptability to digital media, while providing feedback on retail investor protection and regulatory improvements.
ANIA’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, advocating for KID simplification, digital delivery, flexibility for multi-option insurance products, and clearer regulatory guidance to enhance retail investor protection and product transparency.
ASPIM’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s use, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and enforcement—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the EU’s Capital Markets Union strategy.