Deutscher Derivate Verband (DDV) responds to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, highlighting market adaptation challenges, investor comprehension issues with Key Information Documents (KIDs), and concerns over information overload affecting retail investor decisions.
Deutsches Aktieninstitut’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy review.
ESBG’s response to the European Commission’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, enforcement, and scope—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the Capital Markets Union Action Plan.
Euronext’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, contributing insights on retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope for structured products and regulated markets.
European Banking Federation response to EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing scope, product taxonomy, KID format, market practices, and cost disclosure to improve retail investor protection under the EU retail investment strategy.
BNP Paribas submits feedback to the European Commission and ESAs on the PRIIPs Regulation review, covering KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, scope, and enforcement. The response highlights its pan-European structured products and insurance-based investments distribution, emphasizing regulatory impact on retail investor protection.
Börse Stuttgart’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy review.
Bund der Versicherten (BdV) responds to EBA’s call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation, advocating for improved retail investor protection, clearer cost disclosures, and tailored KID requirements for insurance-based investment products (IBIPs) in Germany.
BVI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing challenges in investor disclosure, performance information, and cost alignment with MiFID II and IDD, ahead of the 2023 implementation deadline.
CFA Institute response to the European Commission and ESAs' call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope ahead of the 2022 retail investment strategy.
Crédit Agricole Group’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing concerns over regulatory stability, KID effectiveness, and proposed changes for structured and insurance-based investment products.
Deutsche Börse Group responds to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing challenges in Key Information Document (KID) requirements for exchange-traded derivatives, regulatory scope, and retail investor protection under the EU’s retail investment strategy.
German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC) response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing key issues like KID accuracy, digital adaptation, and investor protection improvements for structured and derivative banking products.
GDV (German Insurance Association) responds to EBA’s call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation, highlighting insurers’ experience with Key Information Documents (KID), advocating for modernization to better reflect insurance-specific features like biometric protection and streamlined cost disclosures under the EU retail investment strategy.
Institut des actuaires (France) submits feedback to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, scope, and retail investor protection as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy.
Insurance Europe’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, highlighting concerns over the short consultation timeline, market impact of Insurance-based Investment Products (IBIPs), and challenges in aligning regulatory changes with consumer testing and digital adaptation.
EFAMA’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, advocating for stability in the PRIIP KID framework post-2022 implementation, emphasizing investor adaptation needs, and cautioning against frequent regulatory changes to avoid costs and maintain confidence.
European Issuers' response to the EBA's call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, focusing on retail investor protection, Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, digital adaptation, and corporate bond treatment under the EU's retail investment strategy.
EUSIPA's response to the EBA's call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, highlighting concerns over frequent regulatory changes, alignment with MiFID rules, and the need for an evidence-based review of retail investment product disclosures and investor protection frameworks.
Finance Denmark’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the effectiveness of Key Information Documents (KIDs) for retail investors, challenges in comparability, digital adaptation, and the transition from UCITS KIID to PRIIPs KID by December 2022.