Publications

ANIA’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, advocating for KID simplification, digital delivery, flexibility for multi-option insurance products, and clearer regulatory guidance to enhance retail investor protection and product transparency.

ASPIM’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document’s use, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, and enforcement—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the EU’s Capital Markets Union strategy.

ALFI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing key issues like the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, digital adaptation, scope, and investor protection, while advocating for a level playing field in product disclosures and consumer-tested reforms.

Assogestioni’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, performance scenarios, cost disclosure, and transition from UCITS KIID to PRIIPs KID by 2023.

ASSORETI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, assessing the Key Information Document (KID) effectiveness, digital adaptation, enforcement, and scope—supporting the EU’s retail investment strategy review by 2022.

Deutscher Derivate Verband (DDV) responds to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, highlighting market adaptation challenges, investor comprehension issues with Key Information Documents (KIDs), and concerns over information overload affecting retail investor decisions.

Deutsches Aktieninstitut’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy review.

ESBG’s response to the European Commission’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing KID usage, comprehension alerts, digital adaptation, enforcement, and scope—supporting retail investor protection reforms under the Capital Markets Union Action Plan.

Euronext’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, contributing insights on retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope for structured products and regulated markets.

European Banking Federation response to EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing scope, product taxonomy, KID format, market practices, and cost disclosure to improve retail investor protection under the EU retail investment strategy.

BNP Paribas submits feedback to the European Commission and ESAs on the PRIIPs Regulation review, covering KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, scope, and enforcement. The response highlights its pan-European structured products and insurance-based investments distribution, emphasizing regulatory impact on retail investor protection.

Börse Stuttgart’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation, addressing retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope as part of the EU’s retail investment strategy review.

Bund der Versicherten (BdV) responds to EBA’s call for evidence on PRIIPs Regulation, advocating for improved retail investor protection, clearer cost disclosures, and tailored KID requirements for insurance-based investment products (IBIPs) in Germany.

BVI’s response to the EBA’s call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, addressing challenges in investor disclosure, performance information, and cost alignment with MiFID II and IDD, ahead of the 2023 implementation deadline.

CFA Institute response to the European Commission and ESAs' call for evidence on the PRIIPs Regulation review, focusing on retail investor protection, KID effectiveness, digital adaptation, and regulatory scope ahead of the 2022 retail investment strategy.