- Question ID
-
2026_7750
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
- Article
-
430
- Paragraph
-
7
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
- Article/Paragraph
-
20a
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
sign validation rules J_03.00 - BREAKDOWN OF SENSITIVITY ESTIMATES - IRRBB
- Question
-
Why are validation rules v23169_s and v23171_s implemented?
- Background on the question
-
Last year the validation rules v16319_s and v22331_s were de-activated because some derivative rows could become negative. Now the same kind of validation rules are re-introduced, which will lead to the same issues.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the matter it refers to has already been identified and will be considered for a forthcoming version of the Reporting framework / release of the respective validation rules.
- Status
-
Rejected question
