In the report C0700 we saw that the new dynamism with the errata 5 is using the value qEC:qx1 to display the “total” breakdown and for us it seems to be fine

Where in report C080* and C3407, we understand that the taxonomy is allowing three types of totals :

=> (In the table below qae0 is used on report C0801,C0802, C08.03,C0805, C0805.1 , where aAE0 is used for report C3407)

From my point of view when I look at the ITS and more specifically to the ITS relative to the report C08* exposure classes, I only see that the report should have a :

• Dedicated sheet for A.1 Total under the “IRB approaches when neither own estimates of LGD nor Conversion Factors are used (Foundation IRB approach)” section for me this correspond to qx2022
• Dedicated sheet for B.1 Total under the “IRB approaches when own estimates of LGD and/or Conversion Factors are used” section for me this correspond to qx2023

But I do not see a need for a dedicated sheet corresponding to an overall TOTAL as it should be for “qx0 : Not applicable/ All exposure classes and approaches” 

Furthermore when I look at the validation I saw that some of them that works on the TOTAL exposures like :

v0680_m  : with {default: 0, interval: true}: sum ({tC_43.00.a, r0040, c0020}) = sum ({tC_07.00.a, r0130, c0220} [ where qEBB in {[eba_qEC:qx0]}]) + sum ({tC_08.01.a, r0060, c0260} [ where qEEA in {[eba_qAE:qx2022], [eba_qAE:qx2023]}])

We see that for report C0700 the value eba_qEC:qx0 (now this value correspond to value qx1 since the errata 5 of the taxonomy) is used where for report C0801 only the values eba_qAE:qx2022, eba_qAE:qx2023 are used.

• Can you indicate If the EBA is expecting the filler to fill up the dynamism on dimension eba_qAE:qx1 for report C080* / C3407or if we can tell our client to not use this value?