we have a suspicion of schizophrenic modeling on the new C1000 report.

 Indeed on this report when we look at the annotated templates it seems that all cells from column 0090 are sharing the same XBRL address as their corresponding cell for the same row from column 0100.

Which means that from a technical point of view we will only be able to submit one “amount” per pair of cells C0090/C0100 for a dedicated row.

For instance the Annotated templates stats that :

{C_10.00, r0060, c 0090, s0000}=={C_10.00, r0060, c 0100, s0000} 
VariableID 3295841 
VariableVID = 3295841 

In the same time when we look at the ITS :

• We understand that may be possible that the transitional provisions do not apply  and so that or instance amount reported in cell 0020 _ 0090 can be equal to the amount in cell  0020 _ 0100 where the amount expected  for both cell is zero. 
• But we do expect from our understanding of the ITS that the transitional provision may apply and that the impact should be reported in various rows. In this case we will need to report different amounts on a specific row for those two columns, which seems unfeasible with the current setting.

Do you agree with our understanding?