- Question ID
-
2024_7213
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Credit risk
- Article
-
235
- Paragraph
-
3
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
Not applicable
- Type of submitter
-
Individual
- Subject matter
-
Applying risk weight in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3
- Question
-
In case of exposure and guarantee denominated in different currencies, which currency shall be taken into account in the process of application of risk weight for guaranteed part of exposure in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3?
- Background on the question
-
In Regulation (Eu) 2024/1623 Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor ("CRR3”) Article 235 paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
“3. Institutions may extend the preferential treatment set out in Article 114(4) and (7), to exposures or parts of exposures guaranteed by the central government or the central bank as if those exposures were direct exposures to the central government or the central bank, provided that the conditions set out in Article 114(4) or (7), as applicable, are met for such direct exposures”.
In accordance with Article 114 paragraphs 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 ("CRR”) institution should verify if currency of the exposure to central government (or central bank) is denominated and funded in the domestic currency of that central government (or central bank).
In case when currency of the guarantee is different from currency of the exposure, it is not clear which currency should be taken into consideration under CRR3 rules. To obtain risk weight equal 0%, should guarantee be denominated in currency of the central government and should direct exposure be funded in currency of that exposure?
We believe that only in that situation foreign exchange risk of the institution will be mitigated. Moreover, currency mismatch between guarantee and direct exposure will be covered by appropriate FX haircut in accordance with Article 233 paragraph 3 of CRR.
- Submission date
- Final publishing date
-
- Final answer
-
Article 235(3) CRR requires for extending the preferential treatment set out in Article 114(4) or (7) CRR that the conditions in Article 114(4) or (7) CRR would be met if the guaranteed exposures or parts of exposures were direct exposures to the central government or central bank. Consequently, the relevant currency for assessing these conditions is the domestic currency of the central government or central bank providing the unfunded credit protection because this determines the currency for the treatment as if this was a direct exposure to the central government or central bank. Therefore, the unfunded credit protection has to be denominated in this currency, and the protected amount has to be funded in that same currency. Furthermore, where the guarantee is denominated in a currency other than that of the guaranteed exposure, the resulting currency mismatch shall be addressed in accordance with Article 233(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).
- Status
-
Final Q&A
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Disclaimer
The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.