- Question ID
-
2024_7156
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Funding Plans
- Article
-
Part II
- Paragraph
-
2.2
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- EBA/GL/2014/04 - Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions - repealed by EBA/GL/2019/05
- Article/Paragraph
-
Annex 1
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Failed rule EGDQ_0875 – proposed check on 12/2023 FP
- Question
-
How to cope with the issue described below for the future EBA Funding Plan deliveries avoiding any “failed” rule?
- Background on the question
-
The validation rule “EGDQ_0875” has been implemented as a proposed check for EBA Funding Plan 2023 for the first time and referring to the EBA Funding Plan template “P_01_01_Asset balance”. The description of this rule is as follows:
“If geographical breakdown is reported in FINREP, the domestic loans and advances to households and corporations, other loans and advances and reverse repurchase loans ({r020+r040+r110+r181+r191+r195+r197,c010}) are expected to be more than the domestic loans and advances in FINREP ({F20.01,r0090+r0095+r0099+r0130+r0144+r0174+r0178+r0183+r0233+r0237,c0010})”
In our point of view this validation rule leads to an error since the volumes of “counterparty split (e.g. row codes 030, 100, 180, …..)”, which is the supercategory of geographical breakdown, come from another FinRep table F05.01. The problem we see is, that the “Loan and advances” definition of F05.01 (counterparty split) is different to F20.01 (geographical breakdown). The table F05.01 includes the position “other demand deposits” and excludes the position “trading loans and advances” while in F20.01 it is vice versa. Due to different “loans and advances” definition the volume can’t match and thus rule will lead to an error.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the issue it raises is beyond the remit of the Q&A process and as such it cannot be addressed via a Q&A.
The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts. The Q&A process cannot, for example, consider issues which would require changes to the regulatory framework.
For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.
- Status
-
Rejected question