- Question ID
-
2022_6406
- Legal act
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Topic
- Market risk
- Article
-
327
- Paragraph
-
1
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Not applicable
- Article/Paragraph
-
n.a.
- Name of institution / submitter
-
The German Banking Industry Committee
- Country of incorporation / residence
-
Germany
- Type of submitter
-
Industry association
- Subject matter
-
Own credit risk
- Question
-
Should own credit risk be considered in the Alternative Standardised Approach of the FRTB?
- Background on the question
-
According to the current Regulation, para. 327 (1) of the CRR, own credit risk is not considered within the specific risk component of the standardized approach. From our perspective, the treatment of own credit risk in the Alternative Standardized Approach (ASA) of the FRTB is not yet explicitly clarified. We assume that the intention is to keep the existing approach where own credit risk is not considered in the standard approach.
In our view, it makes no sense to consider own credit risk in the Alternative Standardised Approach of the FRTB. In accordance with Art. 33 (1) b) CRR, the effects of own creditworthiness are neutralized in regulatory capital. This is also the procedure for internal capital. The effects should therefore also not be considered in the market risk. In addition, from an accounting perspective, a deterioration in the economic situation of the issuing institution would (or could) result in issued liabilities hedging assets through an offsetting effect, which cannot be the objective. In consultation with the relevant JST, the institution concerned will not consider the effects of own creditworthiness in the FRTB-ASA.
- Submission date
- Rejected publishing date
-
- Rationale for rejection
-
This question has been rejected because the objective of the Q&A tool is not to answer questions that put into doubt the correctness of the legal framework, seek a modification of the legal framework or would require such a modification in order to address the question.
See also Q&A 5292.
The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts.
For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.
- Status
-
Rejected question