- Question ID
-
2016_2561
- Legal act
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
- Article
-
78
- Paragraph
-
2
- COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
- Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions (for benchmarking the internal approaches)
- Article/Paragraph
-
78/7
- Name of institution / submitter
-
Rabobank
- Country of incorporation / residence
-
The Netherlands
- Type of submitter
-
Credit institution
- Subject matter
-
Benchmarking
- Question
-
With regard to Annex I - C 103.00 we see that EBA requires data that the bank already reports regularly via COREP. For some of them, we see a so-called legal reference. Examples: 22 120 13 Collateral Value 22 140 13 Maturity 22 160 13 Provisions non-performing exposures The question is: do we comply to the EBA Benchmark requirements if we report equally to the regular COREP report? Or should we use these data and follow the legal reference to calculate it in a deviating way?
- Background on the question
-
We prefer to follow the COREP as much as possible.
- Submission date
- Final answer
-
For template C 103.00 of Annex I of Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on benchmarking) the same definitions apply as used in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on reporting, but the granularity and breakdown of data to be submitted in template C 103.00 are of a greater extent than those included in Annex I of the ITS on reporting.
DISCLAIMER:
The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal, which may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A relates.
- Status
-
Archive
- Answer prepared by
-
Answer prepared by the EBA.
- Note to Q&A
-
Update 26.03.2021: This Q&A has been archived in the light of the most recent amendments to the ITS 2016/2070 on Supervisory Benchmarking.