In the case of a single transaction that is not subject to a netting agreement, is the exposure value (for CCR) of a contract listed in Annex II the greater of "zero" and "the difference between the exposure value of that transaction and the CVA for that counterparty being recognised as an incurred write down". When using Mark-to-market Method (Article 274) for determining the exposure value the institution sums up the current replacement cost and potential future credit exposure. In a case of a contract with a positive value an institution attaches current market value to the contract in order to determine the current replacement cost, and then adds the potential future exposure (notional amounts multiplied with %). The Article is unclear about the treatment of contracts with negative replacement costs. Are contracts with negative replacement costs (which are not subject to legally enforceable netting agreement - single transactions) also subject to add-ons for potential future exposure?