Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Supervisory Factor for Credit Derivatives with underlying securitization for SA-CCR

The supervisory factor for the credit risk category add-on is to be assigned based on the rating assigned to the issuer of the underlying credit derivative.For securitisations, should the rating of the SPV issuing the various tranches be used or can the rating of the tranche be used? If the SPV is not rated but the tranches are, should the exposure be considered unrated?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7216
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 20/01/2025

Volatility Haircuts for Eligible Securitisation Collateral

Does the FCCM approach apply to unrated senior securitisation tranches that qualify as eligible collateral (i.e, as per article 197(1)h, "securitisation positions that are not resecuritisation positions and which are subject to a 100 % risk weight or lower in accordance with Article 261 to Article 264")?  If so, which supervisory volatility haircuts apply since there is no CQS associated with these under Sec- SA?  In addition, the new securtisation mappings of ECAI Ratings CQS 1-18 under Sec-ERBA have not been translated into Table 1 of Article 224, which continues to refer to CQS 1-4 seemingly under the old securitisation rules.  Which supervisory volatility haircuts apply under the new CQS mapping for rated securitisation tranches (as described in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1801 of 11 October 2016, as Amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2365 of 2 December 2022)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7214
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 03/06/2025

Applying risk weight in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3

In case of exposure and guarantee denominated in different currencies, which currency shall be taken into account in the process of application of risk weight for guaranteed part of exposure in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7213
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/07/2025

Remaining maturity of the transactions for collateralised transactions

As per CRR Article 162(2)(c)& (d)- This states (as per below). Can the term "remaining maturity" in the below paragraphs be defined as Margin Period of Risk for collateralised transactions and Contractual maturity for un-collateralised transactions? (c)  for exposures arising from fully or nearly-fully collateralised derivative instruments listed in Annex II and fully or nearly-fully collateralised margin lending transactions which are subject to a master netting agreement, M shall be the weighted average remaining maturity of the transactions where M shall be at least 10 days; (d)  for repurchase transactions or securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions which are subject to a master netting agreement, M shall be the weighted average remaining maturity of the transactions where M shall be at least five days. The notional amount of each transaction shall be used for weighting the maturity;

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/11 - Guidelines on disclosure requirements under Part Eight of CRR
  • ID: 2024_7204
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 07/03/2025

Definition of ADC exposures

Should ADC exposures include exposures related to financing land acquisition for development and construction purposes or the development and construction of residential or commercial property for borrower’s own use?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7201
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

EBA publication on hard test results

Does EBA plan to publish information related to loss rates for immovable property markets in third countries? If yes, when is such a publication to be expected and which third countries will be covered?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7197
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/03/2025

Treatment of leasing residual values under the standardized approach for credit risk

May the ‘’1/t*100%* residual value” formula introduced by CRR article 134.7 for the risk-weighted exposure amounts be applied to all leasing residual values? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7195
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 27/03/2025

Calculation of loss rates for income producing real estate (IPRE) under the standardized approach for credit risk under the CRR III (Regulation (EU) 2024/1619)

What is the correct calculation of loss rates for the purposes of Articles 125 para. 2 subpara. 3 and 126 para. 2 subpara. 3 CRR (as amended by regulation (EU) 2024/1623, ie. CRR III)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7190
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/10/2024

Treatment of bridge financing in the calculation of the risk weight (RW*)

As the objective of Article 132c (1) CRR, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/876 – CRR2, is to “calculate the risk-weighted exposure amount for their off-balance-sheet items with the potential to be converted into exposures (…)”, should the calculation of RW* actually exclude short-term liabilities (e.g. bridge financing)? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7189
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 10/10/2025

Can the Article 122a adjustment be combined with the Article 501 SME-adjustment?

The Article 122a paragraph 3  letter c subletter ii CRR says, that if all the criteria are met, there can be a factor of 80 % applied. But it can't be combined with the 75 % adjustment of Artikle 501a. But can it be combined with the adjustment for SMEs due to Article 501?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7186
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 19/03/2025

CRR3 - ETV calculation

With the CRR3 application, can you please confirm us the way to calculate the ETV ratio?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7175
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 30/10/2025

Simultaniously use of the SME and infrastructure factor

Please see the existing question, which was not answered yet: 2020_5551

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2024_7155
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 29/08/2024

application of credit conversion factor in accordance with article 235

How shall institution calculate risk-weighted exposure amounts for off-balance-sheet exposures with unfunded credit protection, to which those institutions apply the standardized approach? How shall credit conversion factor be applied to the formula specified in article 235 before the application of risk weight?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7145
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 29/08/2024

Scope of Subordinated Debt Exposures under Art. 128 (1)(c)

Which bonds can be considered "subordinated debt" under Art. 128 (c)? Only senior non-preferred bonds? Senior Non-Preferred Bonds and Senior Preferred Bonds (which meet the criteria under Art. 72b(3)? Senior Non-Preferred Bonds and Senior Preferred Bonds (that meet the criteria set out in Art. 72b(3) and are recognized as eligible liabilities by the resolution authority)? Senior Non-Preferred Bonds and Senior Preferred Bonds issued by G-SII entities (which meet the criteria set out in Art. 72b(3) and are recognised by the resolution authority as eligible liabilities)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7141
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/07/2025

Financial Sector Entity qualification for entity that assumes a loan in order to acquire an aircraft asset which then enters into a financial leasing agreement with an airline / aircraft operator

Should an entity that assumes a loan in order to acquire an aircraft asset which then enters into a financial leasing agreement with an airline / aircraft operator be treated as object finance / specialised lending or does it in addition need to be viewed as an exposure to a financial institution (and therefore a financial sector entity (FSE)) given the entity enters into a finance leasing arrangement that is an activity set out in point 3 of Annex I of Directive 2013/36/EU?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7120
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/03/2025

Unrated short term claim/exposure

As per CRR Article 120(para 3, subpara c), it states: "If there is a short-term assessment and such an assessment determines a less favourable risk weight than the use of the general preferential treatment for short-term exposures, as specified in paragraph 2, then the general preferential treatment for short-term exposures shall not be used and all unrated short-term claims shall be assigned the same risk weight as that applied by the specific short-term assessment." Question: What is meant by unrated short-term claims as per this paragraph? If there is a general issuer rating available, will the exposures with residual maturity of less than 3 months be classed as Unrated and not eligible for preferential risk weight treatment as per CRR Article 120 (2)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2024_7111
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/07/2024

Risk weight for Exposures in default

What risk weight should be applied to in default exposures, under the standardised approach for credit risk? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7110
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/07/2024

Determination of exposure value cap for netting sets subject to a margin agreement.

The final answer to EBA Q&A 2023_6962 states that when capping the exposure value of a margined netting set at the exposure value of the same netting set not subject to any form of margin agreement “The term NICA, included in the formula set out in Article 275(1) and defined in Article 272(12a), does not include the variation margin posted or received.”   We believe that this is an incorrect reading and could lead to significant under estimation of RWAs whenever the institution is posting significant excess collateral to its client. This can happen particularly when trades with a large MTM unwind at maturity and the collateral balance is exchange back only on T+1 basis.   Take the following example scenario. If calculating the EAD per the margined methodology the variation margin posted to the client offsets some of the MTM of the derivatives and the add-on is fully added to EAD as the multiplier remains 1.    However under the unmargined methodology if I disregard the posted collateral then the negative current replacement cost works to significantly offset the add-on and can actually result in an EAD below the EAD incurred on only the actual replacement cost/current exposure (in this example 140).   Example Scenario       MTM of Derivatives -50 Variation Margin posted to client 150 Replacement Cost (Margined) 100 Add-on (pre multiplier) 100 Multiplier 1 EAD per margined methodology 280     MTM of Derivatives -50 Variation Margin posted to client (ignored as not NICA) 0 Replacement Cost (Unmargined ignoring VM posted) 0 Add-on (pre multiplier) 100 Multiplier 0.78 EAD per unmargined methodology 109     Final capped EAD to unmargined 109   Our understanding is that the wording in Article 274(3) which says “the exposure value of a netting set that is subject to a contractual margin agreement shall be capped at the exposure value of the same netting set not subject to any form of margin agreement” instead of meaning that there is no variation margin and hence this should be completely removed in the unmargined cap calculation should actually be read in conjunction with Article 272(12a) to define that in the absence of a margin agreement there can be nothing classed as “variation margin” and therefore all collateral is part of NICA – “NICA means the sum of the volatility-adjusted value of net collateral received or posted, as applicable, to the netting set other than variation margin”.   If we follow the previous Q&A answer then we will see significant reductions in RWA which we feel are unwarranted vs the counterparty risk for netting sets which exhibit the same portfolio dynamic as in the example above. The purpose of the cap is only to ignore exposure from large threshold amounts and not to avoid exposure from large amounts of posted collateral which are still owed back 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7109
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 23/10/2024

Counting of days past due in factoring arrangements.

As for non-recourse factoring, is it correct to start the counting of days past due based on the payment schedule defined or implied in the contractual terms with the client (i.e., the party from which the factor purchases the receivables)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/07 - Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 CRR
  • ID: 2024_7108
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 30/09/2024