Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Classification as a “specialised debt restructurer” pursuant to Article 36(5) of Regulation No 575/2013

Is it sufficient for an institution to have complied with the criteria specified in Article 36(5) of Regulation No 575/2013, as amended through Regulation (EU) 2024/1623, no later than the last day of the preceding financial year, or must the criteria have been complied with at all times during the preceding financial year, in order for an institution to qualify as a “specialised debt restructurer”?  If it should be understood as “at all times during the preceding financial year”, would it make a difference if an institution, despite having completed a full preceding financial year, underwent a complete reorganisation during that year and began fulfilling the criteria to qualify as a specialised debt restructurer from the point of reorganisation onward? Specifically, how does the interpretation of “at all times during the preceding financial year” apply in such a context? Separately, with respect to the notion of “during the preceding financial year”, if an institution on an individual basis met the criteria to qualify as a specialised debt restructurer during that period, but was deconsolidated from a group which did not meet the criteria, does the institution’s previous inclusion in that consolidated group – which failed to meet the requirements – disqualify it from achieving specialised debt restructurer status on an individual basis?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7264
  • Topic: Credit Risk – Non performing exposures / loan origination
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 17/02/2025

4.0 Reporting Framework - COREP_OF C02 Template

Could you kindly clarify if, in the context of map C02 , the comparison should be made with line 0036 instead of line 0010, considering that the output floor is calculated at the consolidated level and not at the contract level?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7263
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:

Reporting of ESCROW accounts (or other captive accounts) in template F08.01

In which row shall be reported Escrow accounts (or other captive deposits) from non financial companies in template F 08.01 ‘Breakdown of financial liabilities by product and by counterparty sector’?  Either as being ‘Current accounts/overnights deposits’ row 0270 or as ‘Deposits redeemable at notice’ row 0290 or as ‘Deposits with agreed maturity’ row 0280?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7262
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 09/01/2025

Application of DORA Regulation to sub-threshold AIFMs which have chosen to opt-in to the application of the AIFMD (Art. 3(4)), if the thresholds regarding AuM referred to under Article 3(2) of AIFMD are not exceeded

Are sub-threshold alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) as referred to in Article 3(2) of Directive 2011/61/EU (“AIFMD”), which have chosen to opt-in to the application of the AIFMD according to Article 3(4) of that Directive, captured within the scope of application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (“DORA”) under Articles 2(1)(k) and 2(3)(a) of DORA, if the thresholds regarding assets under management (“AuM”) referred to under Article 3(2) of AIFMD are not exceeded by such AIFM?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7260
  • Topic: Other DORA topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 18/02/2025

Equity instrument subject to impairment in F20.04

The instructions for reporting the column "of which: financial assets subject to impairment [...]" regarding equity instruments (see F20.04 r0040 c0012) currently leave room for interpretation about the specific definition of "subject to impairment" to be applied. In particular, we would kindly ask the EBA to clarify whether a) the respective positions should be deactivated (i.e., greyed out) because of non-applicabilityb) there is a different expectation regarding equity instruments that has not been written in the Annex yet (in particular, equity instruments are subject to the IAS 36 impairment test).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7258
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 09/01/2025

Correlation EBA_v7336

Please, review the EBA_v7336 correlation.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7257
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/02/2025

Direct contributions to reserves from shareholders

Which conditions should direct contributions to reserves from shareholders meet when assessing their conformity with the criteria contained in the last subparagraph of Article 26(1) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7256
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/02/2025

emission allowances

Sentence 2 of paragraph 3 of Annex II CRR refers to point (11) of Section C of Annex I MiFID, i.e. to emission allowances. Does that mean that spot market emission allowances are to be treated as derivative contracts listed in Annex II, even though they are not derivative in character?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7255
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:

Regulated financial service

In case of a “regulated financial service” provided by a financial entity authorized / licensed / registered as financial entity to deliver that service, shall it be considered an ICT service in the meaning of DORA?  

  • Legal act: Directive 2022/2556/EU (DORA)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7246
  • Topic: Other DORA topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 18/02/2025

NACE sector K- 'Financial and insurance activities' in F 06.01

Can EBA confirm that Holding companies, as defined in ESA 2010, are out of scope of template F06.01? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7245
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/01/2025

Should repricing coupons be included in J06 sheets?

Should repricing coupons be included in J06 sheets in IRRBB reporting? EBA’s validation formula says that repricing coupons should not be included (validation rules v22320_m and v_22321_m). Otherwise the regulation (Final Draft RTS on Standardised Methodologies on IRRBB, Article 1, “’Notional repricing cash flow’ means: (c) Any interest payment on a part of the principal that has not yet been repaid or repriced) says that repricing coupons should be included. And if those repricing coupons are included (as the regulation says) it will cause validation rules v22320_m and v22321_m to be active because repricing notionals are always greater than the notional only.

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7244
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Application of recognised SyRB on a consolidated basis

May or shall a competent or a designated authority from a Member State, that recognises a systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State in accordance with Article 133 of the CRD, require its domestically authorised institutions to apply that rate on a consolidated basis, covering all exposures targeted by the recognised systemic risk buffer held through subsidiaries, branches or through cross-border lending, in accordance with Article 134 of the CRD ? Does the legal framework permit or require that exposures of domestically authorised institutions held through subsidiaries located in the Member State that sets the buffer rate as well as in other Member States are also included in the scope of recognition? 

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7242
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:

FINREP Template F01.01

We would like to seek clarification regarding the classification of repurchase agreements (repos) in the context of the FINREP reporting framework.Specifically, we am inquiring whether repurchase agreements with a maturity of less than or equal to one day, where the counterparty is a credit institution, can be reported under row 0040 (Other demand deposits) in report F01.01.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7241
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/02/2025

FINREP Templates F25 and F13

It has come to our attention that Form F25.01.a contains data elements that overlap with Form F13.3.1. For instance, F25.01.a Row 0120 Column 0030 shares data with F13.3.1a Row 0020 Column 0010. From a business perspective, this inclusion appears incongruous, and we would appreciate an explanation of the rationale behind this decision. Could you please provide the logic and reasoning for including this shared data element between Form F25 and Form F13?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7240
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Reporting Requirements on exposures subject to behavioural modelling

What is expected to be reported on the template J08.00b in terms of the perimeter of exposures included in the reporting of relevant parameters? Only those exposures actually subject to behavioural modelling by the institution (thus excluding exposures exposed to Prepayment, NMD behavioural modelling and Early Redemption Risks but non modelled by the institution) or all the exposures exposed to such risks, including those on which models are not applied?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7239
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Aggregated method for duration of derivatives

Could the EBA please clarify the expected method to aggregate and report the Duration value (column 0020) in template J 02.00 for derivatives?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2024_7238
  • Topic: Interest Rate Risk for Banking Book (IRRBB)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 28/11/2024

Classification as a “specialised debt restructurer” pursuant to Article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013

To be classified as "specialised debt restructurer" (SDR), the institution’s sight deposits must not exceed 5% of the institution’s total liabilities. Within the context of the regulation, what is the appropriate interpretation of sight deposits when assessing if they meet the conditions from Article 36 (5) (f) of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7235
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/02/2025

Classification as a “specialised debt restructurer” pursuant to article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013

For how long prior to an institution’s classification as a specialised debt restructurer must all the criteria specified in article 36 (5) of Regulation No 575/2013 be met by the institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7234
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 13/02/2025

Seniority categories to use when offsetting the gross JTD amounts of short exposures and long exposures within the DRC calculations for non-securitisations 

Which set of seniority categories shall be utilised and how should they be ranked as the basis for offsetting the gross JTD amounts of short exposures and long exposures within the DRC calculations for non-securitisations? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7233
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025

Vega general interest rate risk and credit spread risk factors

For credit instruments that include issuer-specific optionality, do both general interest rate vega and credit spread vega risk factors need to be considered as part of the SBM? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7232
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/01/2025