Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Contingency Measures under Article 33

Does fallback access to a secondary instance of the dedicated interface in a different data center with dedicated resources, provide an acceptable strategy and plan for the contingency mechanism?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_5054
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/04/2021

Short-term Exposures

What does short-term in this context mean? 90 days of remaining maturity or original maturity of 1 year?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_5053
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Exposure value according to Articles 247(5) and 249(2) CRR2 to be reported in C13.01 column 180

In the context of regulatory reporting of securitization positions under the new EBA regulatory reporting framework 2.9, the question regards the metric expected to be reported in the column [0180] EXPOSURE VALUE of template C13.01. On one hand, the supervisory reporting requirements on ITS under the framework 2.9 define the column [0180] EXPOSURE VALUE of template C13.01 as “Securitisation positions according to Article 248 of CRR”. The Article 248 of Regulation 2017/2401 states that the “exposure value of an on-balance sheet securitisation position shall be its accounting value remaining after any relevant specific credit risk adjustments on the securitisation position have been applied in accordance with Article 110”. As any reference to the application of credit risk mitigation is mentioned on the article 248, we conclude at the this point that the column [0180] EXPOSURE VALUE of template C13.01 should be the exposure value after specific credit risk adjustment after the application of CCF and before application of CRM. On the other hand, the Article 249(2) indicates that the exposure value subject to risk weights has to be after application of credit risk mitigation. However, in Article 247(5), the exposure value subject to risk weights is defined as the exposure value set out in Article 248. There is not a reference to the article 249(2) in article 247(5) or article 248. Could you please give the correct metric to report in column [0180] EXPOSURE VALUE of template C13.01 : is it the exposure value before or after the application of credit risk mitigations ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_5048
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/04/2021

Recording of card payments

If a card has both an e-money and non e-money function, how should a payment be recorded? Should the recording be different based on the type of the reporting institution (for example, depending on whether is an electronic money institution (EMI) or a bank)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5046
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Card payments - acquirer

If an acquirer is not able to distinguish whether a card used for a payment is a card with an e-money function, is the acquirer required to report transactions with such cards under the EBA Guidelines on fraud reporting, and if so, under what breakdown?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5045
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 09/04/2021

Recording of e-money

If a card issued by an E-money institution has a cash function, how should the cash withdrawal from that card be recorded? Should it be recorded on the debit card withdrawal, as the E-money breakdown section does not include a cash withdrawal category?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5044
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Direct debts fraud reporting

In relation to the direct debits fraud, please clarify the reporting criteria for direct debit fraud.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5043
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Reporting of PISP transactions

Should payment initiation service provider (PISP) initiated payments be reported under both Table A (1.1) and Table H (8.x)? More specifically how should these transactions be reported where the customer initiates a payment via a PISP, from their bank account, to one of their payees flagged in the bank’s online channel as “trusted beneficiaries” (Article 13 of the RTS on SCA&CSC).

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5042
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Reporting of PISP initiated payments

Is there a requirement to segregate the Payment Initiation Service Provider (PISP) initiated payments which were executed without Strong customer authentication (SCA), by the relevant availed exemption used? Or are PISP initiated payments, only required to be presented in Bulk (Value, Volume, SCA/Non-SCA)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5041
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Treatment of direct recoveries under AMA

Can a bank use gross losses net of direct recoveries in modelling for capital purposes under Advanced Measurement Approach for operational risk?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_5040
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Reporting of fraud by the acquirers

Regarding the fraud definition, could you please clarify how the following fraud examples should be classified by the acquirers

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2019_5039
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Calculation of absolute value that should be considered according to Article 47c CRR as amended by Regulation UE 2019/630- Deduction for non-performing exposure

How to calculate the absolute value attributable to each non-performing exposure “where the absolute value attributable to each non-performing exposure is determined by multiplying the amounts deducted pursuant to point (d) of Article 36(1) by the contribution of the expected loss amount for the non-performing exposure to total expected loss amounts for defaulted or non- defaulted exposures, as applicable" as indicated in the Article 47c 1(b) (iv)

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_5038
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Treatment of secured lending or capital market-driven transactions that would require an outflow rate higher than 25 % but they have been closed with eligible counterparties

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1620 in article 1 (17) (a) states that a 25% outflow rate has to be applied to secured lending or capital market-driven transactions, closed with eligible counterparties, that would require an outflow rate higher than 25 %. Based on the new LCR Templates published on EBA websites and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1620, it’s not clear in which row these transactions should be reported. Could you provide some instructions for the right reporting?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_5036
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/09/2020

Treatment of Central Bank Overnight deposits in ALMM Template C71

Should central bank fixed term overnight deposits be included within ALMM Template C71 Row 120 "ALL OTHER ITEMS USED AS COUNTERBALANCING CAPACITY"?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_5028
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/09/2020

Interpretation of articles 36 (1) f and 42 of CRR regarding equity-settled share-based payments.

How should be treated shares that are bought and specifically affected to hedge equity-settled share-based payments (payments in equity instruments) ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 - RTS for Own Funds requirements for institutions
  • ID: 2019_5022
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

LCR treatment of settled-to-market derivatives

Should settlement payments (or receipts) made in the context of derivatives structured as "settled-to-market" (or "STM") be considered under Article 2(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/208?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2017/208 - RTS for additional liquidity outflows corresponding to collateral needs resulting from the impact of an adverse market scenario on an institution's derivatives transactions
  • ID: 2019_5020
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/09/2021