2017_3217 Mark-to-Market Method: Add-on for sold options | European Banking Authority Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2017_3217 Mark-to-Market Method: Add-on for sold options
Question ID
2017_3217
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Market risk
Article
274
Paragraph
2
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
NA
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Mark-to-Market Method: Add-on for sold options
Question

Should the PFE add-on for sold options that form part of a larger netting set exceed the maximum possible exposure increase of the netting that may result from the sold option?

Background on the question

The EBA has published different Q&As on the application of the Mark-to-Market method to sold options including Q&A 2013_666 and Q&A 2015_2195. Sold options are examples of derivatives whose market value will never exceed a specific amount. This amount is equal to zero if the full premium is paid at inception of the transaction or equal to the amount of unpaid future premiums if the total premium is paid over time or at the end of the option contract. Consequently, the potential future exposure (PFE) for these derivatives will never exceed the aforementioned amounts. The previous guidance provided by the EBA as part of the Q&A process is not conclusive regarding the treatment of sold options that form part of a larger netting set for the purpose of calculating the PFE add-on under the Mark-to-Market method.

A)    Existing EBA guidance on the PFE add-on calculation of sold options in specific situations

1.     Q&A 2013_666 confirms that a sold option that forms part of a larger netting set (i.e. a netting set that also includes other types of derivatives) must be included in the PFE add-on calculation for the netting set because the (absolute) market value of the sold option may decrease and hence the replacement cost of the netting set may increase.

2.     Q&A 2015_2195 confirms that for (standalone) sold options that do not form part of a larger netting set the PFE add-on is zero because their market value will never be positive. Whilst the existing Q&As concern the PFE add-on calculation of sold options in specific situations, with this Q&A we would like to confirm the underlying general principles for the treatment of sold options to ensure a consistent application of the Mark-to-Market method to sold options in all relevant situations.

B)    Proposed general principles for the PFE add-on calculation of sold options

We outline the proposed general principles for the PFE add-on calculation of sold options below. They distinguish between standalone sold options and those which form part of a larger netting set. The proposed general principles are consistent with the existing EBA guidance for specific situations as outlined above.

1. PFE add-on calculation for standalone sold options

The PFE add-on for standalone sold options should not exceed the maximum possible exposure that may result from the option. For sold options where the full premium is paid up-front this treatment has already been confirmed through Q&A 2015_2195. For sold options where the premium is paid over time or at the end of the option contract, the maximum possible exposure will never exceed the amount of unpaid premiums. Hence, in this case the PFE add-on should not exceed the amount of unpaid premiums which equals the maximum possible exposure.

2. PFE add-on calculation for sold options included in a larger netting set

The PFE add-on for sold options that form part of a larger netting set should not exceed the maximum possible exposure increase of the netting set that may result from the option. This principle is consistent with Q&A 2013_666 which states that sold options contribute to the PFE add-on. The Q&A refers to the specific example of a netting set composed of an interest rate swap with a market value of 100 and a sold option with a market value of -30. The Q&A clarifies that the inclusion of the sold option in the PFE add-on calculation is required because the market value of the netting set may increase due to a potential “decrease of the fair value of the sold option”. It acknowledges that the market value of the sold option will never exceed zero. Accordingly, as per the existing Q&A, the PFE add-on for the sold option should not exceed 30 in the example, which corresponds to the maximum possible exposure increase of the netting set that may result from the sold option with a negative market value of -30.

Submission date
08/03/2017
Final answer

Article 274(1) CRR specifies that the PFE shall be calculated by multiplying the notional amount or underlying value of a derivative, as applicable, by a percentage as indicated in tables 1 and 2 of that article. The same applies for derivatives included in eligible netting agreements, as specified in Article 298(1)(c)(ii) on how to calculate PCEgross. Neither of those provisions permit to limit the PFE associated to a contract with respect to the value resulting from the multiplication of its notional amount or underlying value, as applicable, by the percentages specified in Article 274 CRR.

As a consequence - except for written options that are not part of a netting agreement, or netting sets only comprised of written options, which shall not be subject to PFE calculations as specified in Q&A 2195 – the PFE for written options included in the calculation of the counterparty exposure should not be capped at an amount lower than the amount resulting from the multiplication of the contract notional by the percentages set out in Article 274 CRR.
Institutions may nevertheless use the Standardised Method in Section 5, or following permission from the Competent Authority may use the Internal Model Method in Section 6, to reflect more accurately the PFE generated by sold options in their netting sets.

Status
Archive
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.
Note to Q&A

Update 16.09.2021: This Q&A has been archived in light of the change(s) in Article 274 to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), applicable from 28.06.2021.

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive