2021_6228 Application of the conditions set out at Article 104b(2) CRR which apply to trading desks when there is no approval for or operation of alternative internal models. | European Banking Authority Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2021_6228 Application of the conditions set out at Article 104b(2) CRR which apply to trading desks when there is no approval for or operation of alternative internal models.
Question ID
2021_6228
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Other issues
Article
104b
Paragraph
(2)
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Type of submitter
Credit institution
Subject matter
Application of the conditions set out at Article 104b(2) CRR which apply to trading desks when there is no approval for or operation of alternative internal models.
Question

Can the conditions for trading desks arising pursuant to Article 104b(2) apply where the obligation to establish trading desks pursuant to Article 104b(1) does not arise?

Background on the question

An institution operates a trading desk, without having sought or having been approved for the operation of an alternative internal model for the purposes of its market risk capital requirement. Article 104b(1) CRR clearly provides that the obligation to establish trading desks only arises in the context of approved alternative internal models. However, there is doubt as to whether the application of the conditions for operating trading desks, as set out in Article 104b(2) apply, in circumstances where an institution is not required to establish trading desks because it does not operate an alternative internal model (thus deriving a potential capital benefit), but notwithstanding this chooses to operate trading desks in the ordinary course of business.

On the basis of a plain-meaning review of the text, there are two issues which have the potential to suggest that Article 104b(2) conditions could apply to trading desks generally:

- the definition of “trading desk”, as set out above, is a qualitative definition and not linked to the internal model requirements; and

- the Article 104b(2) conditions do not explicitly (within its own text) link to the Article 104b(1) establishment obligation, such that, in circumstances where a “trading desk” within the meaning of Article 4(1)(144) is established (irrespective of any obligation to do so), the conditions in (2) appear to attach to it.

Notwithstanding the above, there are in our view, more and better reasons to believe these conditions should only apply in circumstances where an internal model is approved. In this respect:

- While Article 104b(2) does not reference Article 104b(1), Article 104b(1) does reference Article 104b(2), wherein it provides that: “Trading book positions shall be attributed to the same trading desk only where they… are consistently managed and monitored in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article”. Sequentially, a relevant institution must apply for and be approved to operate an alternative internal model, must therefore establish one or more trading desks and then ensure that (to the extent it is attributing trading book positions to such a trading desk) it complies with the conditions in subsection (2).


- Recent changes to the trading book governance provisions set out in Article 103(2)(b) of the CRR appear to have been made to delineate between trading institutions that run trading desks and ones that do not. Given the conditional obligation to establish trading desks only in particular circumstances, it may be that this is designed to delineate between those institutions running internal models and not.

- Outside the context of Article 104b, the only references in the CRR to “trading desks” arise in the following places:

(a) Article 102(4) (where an explicit link is drawn to internal model reporting requirements);

(b) Article 103 (as set out above);

(c) Article 430b (3) and (4) which set out the aforementioned reporting requirements to which Article 102(4) and 104b(1) are linked; and

(d) the following range of Articles which all sit within Chapter 1b of Title IV to the CRR (entitled “Alternative internal model approach”):

(i) Article 325az Alternative internal model approach and permission to use alternative internal models;
(ii) Article 325ba Own funds requirements when using alternative internal models;
(iii) Article 325bc Partial expected shortfall calculations;
(iv) Article 325bd Liquidity horizons;
(v) Article 325be Assessment of the modellability of risk factors;
(vi) Article 325bf Regulatory back-testing requirements and multiplication factors;
(vii) Article 325bg Profit and loss attribution requirement;
(viii) Article 325bl Scope of the internal default risk model; and
(ix) Article 325bm Permission to use an internal default risk model.

- the Basel III standards appear to indicate that these conditions should only apply in circumstances where an internal model is approved. In this respect:
 

(a) The “Calculation of RWA for market risk” standard 12 (“MAR12”), sets out in its subheading “This chapter defines a trading desk, which is the level at which model approval is granted”.
 

(b) MAR 12.2 (3) further provides that:

“Supervisors will treat the definition of the trading desk as part of the initial model approval for the trading desk, as well as ongoing approval:

(a) Supervisors may determine, based on the size of the bank’s overall trading operations, whether the proposed trading desk definitions are sufficiently granular.

(b) Supervisors should check that the bank’s proposed definition of trading desk meets the criteria (listed in key elements set out in MAR12.4)…”

(c) MAR 12.4, in turn, provides for many of the same conditions as those listed in Article 104b(2).

- It appears, therefore, that the Basel standards which underlie much of the CRR requirements are established in such a manner as to put controls around trading desks for the purposes of internal models and that, when read in a wider context, the obligations in respect of trading desks in the CRR are all, in one way or another, tied to the operation of internal models.

Submission date
06/10/2021
Rejected publishing date
29/04/2022
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because it is considered that EBA guidance or clarification is not needed with regard to the issue that it raises. For example, this can be the case where it is considered that the existing regulatory framework is sufficiently clear and unambiguous, or where different practices may be possible but it is not currently necessary to harmonise these further through the Q&A process.

The Single Rule Book Q&A tool has been established to provide explanations and non-binding interpretations on questions relating to the practical application or implementation of the provisions of legislative acts referred to in Article 1(2) of the EBA’s founding Regulation, as well as associated delegated and implementing acts, and guidelines and recommendations, adopted under these legislative acts.

For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see “Additional background and guidance for asking questions”.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive