Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2023_6723 Extent of real time transaction monitoring expected when executing and processing payments.
Question ID
2023_6723
Legal act
Directive (EU) 2015/849 (AMLD)
Topic
Customer Due Diligence
Article
13
Paragraph
(1)
Subparagraph
(d)
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
N/A
Name of institution / submitter
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit
Country of incorporation / residence
Malta
Type of submitter
Competent authority
Subject matter
Extent of real time transaction monitoring expected when executing and processing payments.
Question

Article 13(1)(d) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 sets out the on-going monitoring obligation of obliged entities.  This includes the 'scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the obliged entity's knowledge of the customer, the business and risk profile, including where necessary the source of funds'.  However, the said Directive does not set out whether or the extent to which the scrutiny of transactions is to take place in real time or post the execution of transactions.  This is of particular relevance within the ambit of payment service providers given that these same service providers are also subject to timelines for the execution and processing of payment transactions.  To what extent, if at all, do Competent Authorities require payment service providers, including credit institutions that are providing payment services, to carry out real time transaction monitoring? If this is a requirement, do Competent Authorities also require real time transaction monitoring in case of transactions involving high amounts? If Competent Authorities do not require real time transaction monitoring, what is the justification for this position?

Background on the question

In addition to Article 13(1)(d), Article 18(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 also requires obliged entities 'to examine, as far as reasonably possible, the background and purpose of all complex and unusually large transactions, and all unusual patters of transactions, which ahve no apparent economic or lawful purpose. In particular, obliged entities shall increase the degree and nature of monitoring of the business relationship, in order to determine whether those transactions or activities appear suspicious'. Moreover, Article 35(1) of the same Directive sets out an obligation on the part of obliged entities 'to refrain from carrying out transactions which they know or suspect to be related to proceeds of criminal activity or to terrorist financing until they have completed the necessary action in accordance with point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 35(1) and have complied with any further specific instructions from the FIU or the competent authorities in accordance with the law of the relevant Member State'.

GL 4.74 of the EBA’s Risk Factor Guidelines sets out that ‘[f]irms should in any case determine which transactions they will monitor in real time, and which transactions they will monitor ex-post. As part of this, firms should determine: i. which high-risk factors, or combination of high-risk factors, will always trigger real-time monitoring; and ii. which transactions associated with higher ML/TF risk are monitored in real time, in particular those where the risk associated with the business relationship is already increased’.

Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/847 requires recipients of payments ‘to implement effective procedures, including, where appropriate, ex-post monitoring or real-time monitoring’ to detect payment transactions that are not accompanied with the information required in terms of the same Regulation. GL 28 of the Joint Guidelines under Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2015/847 on the measures payment service providers should take to detect missing or incomplete information on the payer or the payee, and the procedures they should put in place to manage a transfer of funds lacking the required information sets out that ‘PSPs and IPSPs should determine which high-risk factors, or combination of high-risk factors, will always trigger real-time monitoring, and which will trigger a targeted ex-post review. In cases of specific concern, transfers of funds should always be monitored in real time’.

Submission date
20/02/2023
Rejected publishing date
12/01/2024
Rationale for rejection

This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already explained or addressed in paragraphs 4.74 and 4.75 of Guidelines amending Guidelines EBA/2021/02 on customer due diligence and the factors credit and financial institutions should consider when assessing the money laundering and terrorist financing risk associated with individual business relationships and occasional transactions (‘The ML/TF Risk Factors Guidelines’) under Articles 17 and 18(4) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 (EBA/GL/2023/03). For further information on the purpose of this tool and on how to submit questions, please see 'Additional background and guidance for asking questions'.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive