Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Counterparty breakdown - classification based by immediate counterparty

What is definition of jointly incurred exposures for the purposes of FinREP (Annex V par. 43) ? Are there examples? Can guarantors be regarded as obligors and thus the exposures guaranteed by them as jointly incurred exposures?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_5061
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

C 70 treatment of multiple currencies

If on the same day for one counterparty, funds in one currency are maturing and new funds are obtained in another currency, should these be treated as new funds or rollovers on the C 70 total template? In the case where the maturing deposit is replaced by more than one new deposit and both have different initial maturities, should the amount in rollover be proportionally spread across both time buckets?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_5058
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Validation rules v2815_m to v2823_m between FINREP and AE

Are validation rules v2815_m to v2823_m between FinRep and AssetEncumbrance plausible if an institution has to report significant portfolios as 'held for sale' in accordance with IFRS 5, in particular taking into account the intention of AssetEncumbrance?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4744
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Definition of an "exposure" in C 15 instructions

We would like to clarify C 15 reporting requirements. Especially which exposures should be included here in case there is immovable property collateral.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4892
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Use of rating before or after transfer in the calculation of the one-year default rates

In a situation where a parent institution (good rating) has issued a full encompassing guarantee for a subsidiary - bad rating, thus supporting the subsidiary before a default event, and preventing (or reducing the risk of) a default – would this constitute a substitution effect due to a credit risk mitigation under paragraph 74 of EBA Guidelines EBA/GL/2017/16?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/16 - Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
  • ID: 2019_4598
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Incorrect validation rule - deposits guarantee scheme

We think that the validation rule v4134_m is incorrect.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2014/04 - Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions - repealed by EBA/GL/2019/05
  • ID: 2017_3502
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Funding Plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Exempting foreign currency - denominated required minimum reserves according to Article 493(7) CRR

How is the level of exposures to central bank, in the form of Euro-denominated required minimum reserves in non-Euro Member States, determined for the purposes of Article 493(7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3737
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Need of prior permission to include minority interest arising from Common Equity Tier 1 instruments issued by subsidiaries located in EU member state and third countries in consolidated CET1 capital of parent institutions established in the EU.

According to Article 26(3) CRR, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/876 (CRR2), is a prior permission by the competent authority required in order for a parent institution located in the EU to include in consolidated CET1 capital minority interests, arising from CET1 instruments, issued by subsidiaries located (a) in an EU Member State, or (b) in a third country? The answer should also clarify whether before granting a permission pursuant to Article 26(3) CRR (if such permission is required), the competent authority is required to consult the EBA (as per the third subparagraph of Article 26(3) CRR), as the instruments issued by the subsidiaries in third countries would not be included in the EBA CET1 instruments list.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2020_5129
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Treatment of CIUs in the standardised approach – Derivatives on CIUs

Title IV Chapter 2 Section 6 and Article 364 (2) b CRR refers to positions in CIUs in general. How shall own funds requirements be calculated for derivative positions with CIUs as underlyings under the standardised approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_4381
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Treatment of CIUs in internal model for market risk – possible restrictions

Is the use of internal models to compute own funds requirement for market risk of positions in CIUs restricted to either of the conditions referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 350?  

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_4378
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/12/2020

Weighted average of the CCF

Internal authorized EAD models may calculate the EAD by means of several parameters, since the exposure behavior could be explained by different factors. Considering that this type of EAD internal model does not estimate a unique CCF, but rather several factors that are applied to different exposure components, the consequent approach implemented to report the CCF in Template C.101 ,C102 and C.103 has been the following: include in the field as per C.100 in Annex IV the parameter that, in the internal EAD formula, is applied to the undrawn amount, in line with the weights that shall be used to compute the average of the CCF at counterparty/portfolio level, according to the provision reported in Annex IV which make reference to art. 166, par 8 of CRR. Please confirm that this approach is in line with the provision set in ITS as for Annex IV C.100.

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions (for benchmarking the internal approaches)
  • ID: 2020_5368
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 27/11/2020

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Are PD-/PD+ calculated separately for each of the (sub)portfolios listed in Annex 4, or are the PD-/PD+ values obtained for a client/exposure to be used consistently and unchanged for all (sub)portfolios?

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2016/2070 - ITS on Supervisory Reporting (for benchmarking the internal approaches) (as amended)
  • ID: 2020_5339
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 27/11/2020

Treatment of securitisation Class A notes guaranteed by a Member State

Pursuant to specific national decree, an originator of NPLs under a securitisation transaction complying with certain requirements may request the government to guarantee the payments of interest and principal on the senior tranche of asset-backed securities. Where senior noteholders of a securitisation benefit from this unconditional, irrevocable and first-demand guarantee from a Member State, what is the expected treatment in the LCR for securitisation notes with respect to Articles 10 and 13? Do we have to consider that article 13 prevails to any other article when qualifying the eligibility for a securitisation?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2019_4786
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/11/2020

Termination rights – Distinguishing between Guidelines which are directed towards ‘all outsourcing arrangements’ from those that are directed towards ‘outsourcing arrangements for critical and important functions’

Are paragraphs 98 and 99 (section 13.4) of EBA/GL/2019/02 - Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements directed towards ‘outsourcing arrangements for critical and important functions’ only or ‘all outsourcing arrangements’?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4782
  • Topic: Internal governance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/11/2020

Meaning of "the last three twelve-monthly observations" in Articles 315(1) and 317(4) CRR regarding the calculation of operational risk requirements

What is the correct application of the words “the last three”, which can be found in the wording “the last three twelve-monthly observations at the end of the financial year” in Article 315(1) CRR on BIA and in Article 317(4) CRR on STA? In particular, does “the last three” include the current year X when calculating the own funds requirements with reference date 31 December X?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3969
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/11/2020

Recognition for large exposure purposes of a guarantee granted by the central government on an equity exposure

Can an equity exposure guaranteed by a central government be exempted from the large exposure framework or can only debt instruments be exempted? In particular, would such guarantees be compliant with the eligibility requirement set in Article 213(1)(b) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3621
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/11/2020

Eligibility of mortgage mandates under Belgian law

Are mortgage mandates under Belgian law eligible as immovable property collateral? Is there a difference between the SA and IRB approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4721
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/11/2020

Customer data transfer to Member States for the purpose of supervision

Does the phrase “data related to their customers” under Article 6 of the Delegated Regulation refer to personal customer data (as defined by EU Regulation 2016/679) or general data for management purposes (e.g. descriptive statistics on the number of customers, customer risk distribution, etc.)?

  • Legal act: Directive (EU) 2015/849 (AMLD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2019/758 – RTS on implementation of group wide AML/CFT policies in third countries
  • ID: 2020_5350
  • Topic: Third country policy
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2020

Disclosure of information within the group related to suspicious activity reports (SARs) to the competent authorities

Does the requirment under Article 5 of the Delegated Regulation refer to the sharing of information on the underlying data of the Suspicious Activity report (SAR) (e.g. transactions, customer data) without disclosing whether the SAR was filed and sent to the local authorities of the third country?

  • Legal act: Directive (EU) 2015/849 (AMLD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2019/758 – RTS on implementation of group wide AML/CFT policies in third countries
  • ID: 2020_5349
  • Topic: Third country policy
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2020

Retroactivity concerning customer consent for data sharing and processing

Is there the expectation that such consent clauses, under Article 4 of the Delegated Regulation, be incorporated into contracts on a go-forward basis from the date the Regulation entered into force (i.e. with new customers and existing customer contract renewals) or is there the expectation that all existing customer contracts will be remediated to meet this requirement? What approach should be used with former customers?

  • Legal act: Directive (EU) 2015/849 (AMLD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2019/758 – RTS on implementation of group wide AML/CFT policies in third countries
  • ID: 2020_5348
  • Topic: Third country policy
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2020