Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Template 9.1 – Mitigating actions: Assets for the calculation of BTAR

Should institutions check the compliance of ‘do no significant harm’ and ‘minimum safeguards’ requirements for BTAR exposures?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures
  • ID: 2024_7004
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/07/2024

F 46 EBA_v1226

Where to recognise foreign exchange differences in template F46 for 0010 (Capital) and c0020 (Share Premium)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2024_7005
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/06/2024

PISP’s access to payable charges applied by the ASPSP on the PSU’s initiated payment via the ASPSP’s dedicated interface

Shall the account servicing payment service provider (ASPSP) make the transaction fees accessible to payment initiation service providers (PISPs) via the dedicated interface?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2021_6320
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/06/2024

Payee-initiated transactions with irregular period or variable amounts for account payments.

Please clarify whether payee-initiated account transactions available in Account Servicing Payment Service Providers (ASPSPs)’ online banking channels are considered discriminatory under PSD2 when not available in the PSD2 Application Programming  Interfaces (APIs). 

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2021_6256
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/06/2024

Level of application of permissions for consolidated netting

How should the term 'consolidated basis' be read in Article 325b CRR? Should permissions in accordance with that article be granted only to the highest EU consolidating entity or is it possible to grant these permissions also to several EU sub-consolidating entities? If it is possible to apply this requirement also on a sub-consolidated basis, should the offsetting of the positions only refer to undertakings included in such an entity’s sub-consolidated group?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7058
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/06/2024

Maturity calculation under IRB for undrawn credit facility

Does Article 162(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) apply to exposures in the form of undrawn credit facilities as the only contractual cash flow payments for the undrawn credit facility are fee-related?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2023_6891
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/06/2024

Mobile Banking Services and SCA in the same app

We use a mobile app, software installed in a separate sandbox on a multi-purpose device, for the elements of strong customer authentication. Is it correct to assume that Article 9 (in COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2018/ 389) does not prevent us from offering mobile banking services through the same app?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2023_6863
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/06/2024

Fraud reporting

How we should treat the transactions that are initiated by PSP (for example refunds, chargebacks, etc.), but those transactions are related to cardholder's actions.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2018/05 - Guidelines on fraud reporting under PSD2 (amended by EBA/GL/2020/01)
  • ID: 2023_6788
  • Topic: Fraud reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/06/2024

Alternative arrangements for variable remuneration in investment firms

Can the use of alternative arrangements for the payment of variable remuneration be approved where the use of instruments under art 32(1)(j) IFD is theoretically possible but might endanger the stability of the investment firm?

  • Legal act: Directive (EU) 2019/2034 (IFD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2021/14 - Guidelines on internal governance under Directive (EU) 2019/2034
  • ID: 2024_7040
  • Topic: Remuneration
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/06/2024

MREL-REPORTING OF THE IMPACT OF GENERAL PRIOR PERMISSION

We would appreciate a confirmation of the below described interpretation in order to correctly feed ITS MREL and TLAC template with reference dates before 30.06.2024 (when the new template will be applicable).

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/763 – ITS with regard to the supervisory reporting and public disclosure of MREL
  • ID: 2023_6852
  • Topic: BRRD Reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/05/2024

Template C 14.00 column 0287 & Template C 14.01, column 0362

Pursuant to Template C 14.00 (column 0287) and Template C 14.01 (column 0362) of the Regulation (EU) 2021/451 (Version: Reporting Framework 3.2) the synthetic excess spread (SES) should be reported under the section “off-balance sheet items and derivatives”. Does this indicate that all synthetic securitisations have to be reported under “off-balance sheet items and derivatives”? More specifically, does the balance sheet treatment of the securitisation positions in columns 0310 – 0400 refer to the securitisation position itself (i.e. all the columns must be either on-balance or off-balance (e.g. off-balance in case of a CDS)) or to the underlying (i.e. the underlying loans must be reported as on-balance and the synthetic excess spread as off-balance; the result is that in the same row (corresponding to one securitisation position) different columns are reported which can refer to both on- and off-balance positions))? E.g.: An institution acts as originator in a direct synthetic securitisation of loans. There are three tranches (junior, mezzanine, senior) and a synthetic excess spread. Significant risk transfer is achieved. The underlying exposures remain on the balance sheet of the originator.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2023_6822
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/05/2024

Calculation of the LTV ratio in FinRep

Article 239x from Annex V mentions that the LTV ratio should be calculated in accordance with the method for the calculation of the ‘current loan-to-value ratio’ (LTV-C) laid down in section 2, chapter 1, paragraph 1 of the ESRB Recommendation on closing real estate data gaps. According to Annex IV, Art 2.3 (b) of the ESRB Recommendation, VC is adjusted for changes in the prior liens on the property. The version from 2016 of the Recommendation also contained an additional passage which was deleted in the 2019 update: (d) Is adjusted by the total amount of the outstanding RRE loan, disbursed or not, that is secured through ‘prior’ liens on the property. In the case of more senior liens on the property, the full amount of the debt secured by these more senior liens needs to be deducted. In the case of ‘equal ranking liens’, an appropriate proportional adjustment should be made. In the current version of the Recommendation or in Annex V it is not clear how VC is adjusted regarding the prior liens on the property (e.g. they are deducted from the full value of the property, proportional adjustments are performed).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2024_7024
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/05/2024

Application of the retention requirements to situations where the retained exposure is transferred to a third-party after losses associated with the relevant exposure

Can a retention holder under Article 6(3)(c) (so-called random selection) of Regulation (EU) 2402/2017 (“Securitisation Regulation”) transfer the retained exposure to a third party if the transfer occurs after crystallisation on the retention holder’s accounts of the losses associated with the relevant exposure?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2017/2402 (SecReg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2023_6743
  • Topic: Provisions applicable to all securitisations
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/05/2024

Risk retention obligation in case of voluntary liquidation of an Alternative investment fund (“AIF”) acting as retention holder under Article 6(3) of the Securitisation Regulation

Assuming an alternative investment fund (“AIF”) set up to disburse loans to be subsequently securitised acts as retention holder under Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2402/2017 (hereinafter, the “Securitisation Regulation”), should it be resolved to voluntarily liquidate the relevant AIF, what would be the appropriate modality to continue to retain the relevant net economic interest? Would the retained net economic interest be distributed to AIF’s unit-holders, pro quota to their holdings, or would AIF’s liquidator be obliged to wait and complete the liquidation process only after the retention obligation has ceased to exist?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2017/2402 (SecReg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2023_6742
  • Topic: Provisions applicable to all securitisations
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/05/2024

LCR treatment of open maturity reverse repos which can be terminated at any point in time

By reference to EBA Q&A 2021_6163, are there some circumstances under which a bank could consider inflows from open reverse repos that  are not contingent for the purposes of its recognition in the LCR? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2024_7053
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/05/2024

Vega and curvature risk requirements for positions in instruments without exercisable optionality that are sensitive to vega risk factors

Should only instruments that are options be subject vega and curvature own funds requirements, or they may apply also to instruments that lack an exercisable optionality?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2024_7006
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/05/2024

Other assets/liabilities in the context of NSFR templates (C 80.00 and C 81.00)

Should institutions report as Other Assets or Other Liabilities also the IFRS accounting corrections deriving from the adoption of a macro-hedging strategy on Interest Rate Risk? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2023_6797
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/04/2024

C14.00 - v7364_m - Type of Assets (column 0160)

The EBA Validation Rule v7364_m states that: For securitization programs qualified for differentiated capital treatment and classified as traditional (and Non NPE), synthetic or ABCP, then the asset class of the portfolio (C14.00 - c0160) must be “Loans to SME (treated as corporate)” or “Loans to SME (treated as retail). Should this control be applicable?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2023_6864
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/04/2024

Template C 14.00 - Validation rule v11661_m - ({C 14.00, c0231} >= {C 14.00, c0251}) or ({C 14.00, c0265} >= {C 14.00, c0251}) - If value missing (but table prerequisites met) “treat as zero/empty string”, Template C 13.01 – Validation rule v7430_m - {c0710} = {c0720} + {c0740} + {c0760} + {c0830} + {c0850}

Range of applicability of validation rules v11661_m and v7430_m in force starting from June 2023 with DPM 3.2.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2023_6866
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/04/2024

Loan collateralized by commercial/residential immovable property in CRR Pillar 3 Template 2 and Template 5

What should be included in the line item "loan collateralized by commercial/residential immovable property" in CRR Pillar 3 Template 2 and Template 5?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - ITS on ESG disclosures
  • ID: 2023_6879
  • Topic: Transparency and Pillar 3
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/04/2024