Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Related party balances

Given that there is no specific guidance for where to classify Related Party balances in several templates eg 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, should Related Party balances be classifed on the nature of the underlying balance or transaction, e.g. Related Parties Loans and Advances within Loans and Advances?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_999
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2015

LCR inflows/outflows for collateralised stock borrow/lend transactions within 30 day window

The LCR reporting templates for Outflows (C52) and Inflows (C53) do not include a section which allows firms to separate reverse-repo and other secured lending/borrowing transactions between those where collateral is re-hypothecated and those where collateral is not re-hypothecated, to cover the reporting institutions outright short positions. How should firms with matched book, fully collateralised stock borrow/stock lend transactions (which mature within 30 days) segregate these transactions from unmatched repo/reverse-repo transactions? The Basel III templates allow a 0% outflow/inflow in such cases (lines 289-295 and 264 of the Basel III implementation monitoring workbook), when the transaction matures in less than 30 days.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_987
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2015

Reporting of Additions (c010) and Reversals (c020) in Table 16.7

In Table 16.7, Additions (010) and Reversals (c020) of impairment on financial and non-financial assets is required to be reported. In accordance with ITS 2. 102, “Additions” shall be reported when, for the accounting portfolio or main category of assets, the estimation of the impairment for the period results in recognition of net expenses. “Reversals” shall be reported when, for the ac-counting portfolio or main category of assets, the estimation of the impairment for the period result in the recognition of net income. We interpret the rule above as the additions and reversals (columns 010 and 020 re-spectively) shall be reported NET, NOT gross (for the accounting portfolio or main category of assets). This means that, if the net of the asset impairment for the period is positive (net income) it should be listed as a reversal, and, if negative (net expense), it should be listed as additions. Does it imply, for example for T 16,7 row 030 (Available-for-sale financial assets), if for all available for sale fin assets held by the reporting entity, the impairments for the period exceeded reversals, only net impairment (net of reversals) are to be recorded (and the reversals will be reported blank)? Or is the netting rule only applicable to a sub-portfolio of assets within Available-for-sale financial assets class (e.g. municipal bonds). If the netting rule is applicable for an entire fin asset class group (e.g. Available-for-sale financial assets), the reporting in table 16,7 should equal to the reporting in Table 2, row 480. Please clarify.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_975
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2015

Client money

To what extent the cash held by a UCITS can be qualified as client money?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_1825
  • Topic: MREL
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Powers of the temporary administrator

Could you please clarify the interaction between Recital 39 and the last sentence of Article 29 (2) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2109
  • Topic: Early intervention
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Provision of IGFS under Article 23

Would a prohibition on the institution or the holding company receiving financial support under an IGFS agreement that does not meet the conditions in Article 23 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) be a satisfactory implementation of that Article?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2106
  • Topic: Intra-group financial support
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Authorisation to breach large exposures requirements in the context of IGFS

How do national legislators transpose Article 23 (1) (h) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) in accordance with the CRR and the CRD IV?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2105
  • Topic: Intra-group financial support
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Institution or entity in Article 19 (3) (a)

Can you please clarify if the provision Article 19 (3) (a) refers to the institution or to the entity?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2103
  • Topic: Intra-group financial support
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Intra-Group Financial Support to subsidiaries in third countries

In case participation in Intra-Group Financial Support agreements by ”subsidiaries in third countries” is already allowed in national law, does Article 19 (1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) still have be explicitly implemented?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2102
  • Topic: Intra-group financial support
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Contents of group resolution plans

Are the contents of group resolution plans listed in Article 12 (3) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) to be considered in addition to the contents of solo resolution plans set out in Article 10 (7) of the same Directive?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2098
  • Topic: Resolution plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Usage of Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) and Single Point of Entry (SPE) in resolution plans (scenarios)

Should the suggested resolution plans assume both the possibility of usage of Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) and Single Point of Entry (SPE) strategies depending on different scenarios and causes of failure or should they clearly identify a preferred strategy and elaborate only on the different resolution tools within this strategy?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1075 - DR on the content of recovery and resolution plans, financial support, independent valuers, contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers, notices of suspension and resolution colleges
  • ID: 2015_2096
  • Topic: Resolution plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Group recovery plans with regard to non-EU subsidiaries

Does the requirement to draw up a group recovery plan as established in Article 7 (1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) also cover non-EU subsidiaries?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2092
  • Topic: Recovery plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Joint control (by more than one Union parent undertaking) over a subsidiary

Into which group recovery plan a subsidiary which is jointly controlled by more than one Union parent undertaking should be included?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2091
  • Topic: Recovery plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Interpretation of “group headed by the Union parent undertaking” in Article 7 (1)

Should “group headed by the Union parent undertaking” in Article 7 (1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) be interpreted as the group subject to consolidated supervision pursuant to Articles 111 and 112 of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV) headed by the Union parent undertaking?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2083
  • Topic: Recovery plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Assessment of group recovery plans

Should group recovery plans be assessed in the same way as recovery plans in Article 6 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)? Is the reference to Article 7 (1) contained in Article 6 (1) correct?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2082
  • Topic: Recovery plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Meaning of “where relevant” in Article 4

Could you please clarify the meaning of the wording “where relevant” in Articles 4 (3) (4) and (8) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2079
  • Topic: Simplified obligations
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Designation of several authorities as resolution authority

Is it possible according to Article 3 (10) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) to make specified resolution authorities responsible for the resolution of particular groups or entities and/or to divide the responsibilities for certain stages of resolution amongst them?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2077
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Cooperation, collaboration and assistance of the competent authority to the resolution authority

How should those provisions of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) (e.g Articles 6 (4); 10; 14; 17; 27 (2); and 32(1)) which entail that competent authorities need to cooperate, collaborate and assist with the resolution authority be reflected in national legislation in situations where both functions are carried out by the same entity?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2076
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015

Entity that formally is not a part of public administration as resolution authority

Is it possible under Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), in particular under Article 3 to designate as a resolution authority, an entity that is entitled to issue administrative decisions but formally is not a part of public administration?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2075
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2015