Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Treatment of retail exposures secured by property under IRB

How should institutions treat a retail exposure for an SME that has a minor property collateral (and thus it is partly secured by immovable property) but the purpose of this loan is not property/mortgage finance? Are the correlation coefficient prescribed in Article 154(3) and the minimum LGD requirement in Article 164(4) applicable for the full exposure?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2016_2599
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 18/11/2016

Assigning Specific Credit Risk Adjustments for a group of exposures to the exposures within the group

Following question 2013_499, could you confirm that this implies that the collective provisions allocated to specific portfolios for accounting purposes (FINREP) will agree at aggregate level with the amounts booked in the financial statements but the allocation for RWA to single exposures will differ from the allocation for accounting purposes to single exposures and thus a single exposure will show a different collective provision for accounting purposes (FINREP) than that for RWA?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 183/2014 - RTS for the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments
  • ID: 2016_2574
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 18/11/2016

Application of Article 215(2)(b) of the CRR

Can the competent authorities be satisfied that the effects of a guarantee (which covers losses resulting from the non-payment of interest and other types of payments which the borrower is obliged to make) justify the treatment of eligible unfunded credit protection when the time of payment such guarantee is indeterminate? Are there other considerations that the competent authorities should take into account to be satisfied with the effects of the guarantee to justify such treatment, in addition to those listed in article 213 and 215(1)(b) and (c) of CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2306
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 18/11/2016

Applying a currency mismatch haircut to OTC derivatives in a netting pool which are in a currency different from settlement currency

For OTC derivative transactions covered by master netting agreements, if the exposure (derivative) currency is different from the settlement currency, should the exposure amount be increased by the currency mismatch haircut?While calculating the replacement cost of the derivatives, should the exposure amount be increased by the currency mismatch haircut?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2394
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Classifications of loans to SPVs as to SME

How should the repayment of loans to SPV's (classified as SME) be considered for the purpose of Article 501 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)? Should the original exposure amount be taken into account? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2016_2711
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Eligible collateral in a central bank

Must liquid assets be eligible in a central bank when LCR is calculated?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2015_2459
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Clarification on the role of the special manager in resolution

We seek clarification on the role of the special manager in resolution as set out in Article 35 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD). This appears to overlap with the role of the temporary administrator as defined in Article 29.Also, is the special manager referred to in Article 35 BRRD a separate institution from that mentioned in Article 72(1) or only its special case?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2185
  • Topic: Special management
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Resolution authorities in the function of special manager

Is it possible for resolution authorities to perform simultaneously the function of "special manager" of an authority mentioned in Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) under the assumption, that in accordance with national law it can perform the "insolvency management" function mentioned in Article 35(8) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2183
  • Topic: Special management
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Treatment of negative accrued interests in the foreign exchange risk

Do negative accrued interests reduce the fx position, where as positive accrued interests increase the fx position?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2016_2797
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Own funds requirements for non-continuous options which are perfectly matched

If a bank transacts in 2 back-to-back non-continuous options so that there is no residual market risk, is there a requirement that each transaction is separately capitalised as is implied by the Regulation. If netting is not allowed this will lead to a significant own funds requirement for what is in effect a zero market risk position, particularly given the treatment of short options positions where a maximum payout is not specified?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 - RTS on non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach
  • ID: 2016_2571
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Position Risk Own Funds Requirement for options positions on CIUs

Is there an own funds requirement for the non-delta risk of options on Collective Investment Undertakings which are treated for position risk in accordance with Article 348 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 - RTS on non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach
  • ID: 2016_2692
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Clarifications regarding the scope of application of Article 33

Can you please clarify Article 33 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD); as a whole, we interpret it to mean that the special rule for Financial Institutions should apply only to Financial Institutions that are not parents in accordance with Article 1(1)(c) or (d), but are subsidiaries of a credit institution or an investment firm. Is this correct?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2179
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Protection of investors

Should investors have access to the national investor compensation scheme or should Member States provide other rules to guarantee adequate investor protection?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2110
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Early intervention power to remove senior management

Can the Early intervention power to remove senior management be framed in national legislation so that it can be applied even if not all other Early intervention measures have been exhausted?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2108
  • Topic: Early intervention
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Determination of exhaustion of supervisory action by the resolution authority

How can the resolution authority determine in the context of the determination that an institution is failing or likely to fail that supervisory action(s) by the competent authority has / have been exhausted and would not prevent the failure of the institution within a reasonable timeframe?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2519
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Application of tools

Does the Commission agree that the Directive must be interpreted in such a way that that the resolution authority should have all the tools available for all institutions so that they can be used depending on the situation, and that it cannot be determined by national legislation, that certain tools (e.g. bail-in) should always be used for the smallest institutions whereas other tools can be applied for SIFIs?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2518
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Transfer to a recipient in full under a partial transfer

Is it possible to transfer certain classes of eligible liabilities to a recipient in full even in case not all liabilities of an institution are transferred to that same recipient?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2436
  • Topic: MREL
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Reimbursement of shareholders and creditors

In our understanding, Articles 36(12) and 46(3) confer upon the resolution authority a mere power - not an obligation - to reimburse shareholders and creditors. If this is the case, is such power an unfettered discretion or should it be exercised under particular conditions? If the latter is correct, which conditions apply?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2351
  • Topic: Valuation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Final valuation lower than the initial valuation

What are the consequences of final valuation being lower than the initial one?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2187
  • Topic: Valuation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Same valuer for provisional and final valuation

Can the resolution authority outsource the provisional valuation? If yes can the same valuer prepare provisional and final valuation?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2186
  • Topic: Valuation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016