Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

For trade finance transactions within 30 days to maturity the DA indicated a 100% inflow for financial customers, however we understand this was for all customers

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 article 425 2 (b) indicates that monies due from trade finance transactions within 30 days are a taken account in full. However the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, article 32 2 (a) and its associated sub paragraph (ii) read as if this only relates to financial customers, therefore are trade finance trascations from non-financial customers less than 30 days to maturity to be taken into account in full as inflows?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2015_2030
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Risk weight of EU unrated central bank whose exposures are guaranteed by its EU government which is rated CQS1

What should be the risk weight of an EU unrated central bank whose exposures are fully guaranteed by its EU government which is rated CQS1?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2014/05 - Guidelines on significant credit risk transfer
  • ID: 2019_4954
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Scope of application of the secured lending regime for liquidity coverage requirement - non-financial customers

(i) Are loans secured by collaterals such as debt securities, equities, mortgages or movable property to be considered as secured lending pursuant to Article 28, paragraph 3 and Article 32, paragraph 3 and 4 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61? Those articles only refer to “secured lending […] transactions as defined in points 2 […] of Article 192 of Regulation (EU) N°575/2013” which defines “secured lending transactions” as “any transaction giving rise to an exposure secured by collateral which does not include a provision conferring upon the institution the right to receive margin at least daily”. (ii) What is the applicable inflow rate to monies due from those transactions, when those are provided to non-financial customers and when the collaterals provided are not reusable except in case of default of the borrower? Is it 100% as for secured lending transactions pursuant to Article 32 para. 3 (b) of delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 or 50% as for monies due from non-financial customers pursuant to Article 32 para. 3 (a) of the same Regulation?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2018_3959
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Look-through approach resulting in a credit risk position of own institution

When applying the look-through approach of Article 132(4) CRR, what risk weight shall an institution apply to a position that is based against its own institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3949
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Goodwill included in the valuation of significant investments

1. For the purposes of Article 37(b) CRR, are the significant investments of the institution limited to the significant investments in financial sector entities (FSE) or should they include all significant investments (i.e. also significant investments in entities that are not financial sector entities)? 2. Should Article 37(b) CRR be applied only when the significant investments outside the prudential perimeter are valued for prudential purposes using the equity method or should it be applied also when the significant investments are valued for prudential purposes at historical cost? 3. Should the amount to be deducted pursuant to Article 37(b) CRR be limited to goodwill or should it include also the other intangible assets included in the valuation of the significant investments of the institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3929
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Notification to Competent Authority for the use of the adjustment referred to in Article 500 (1) CRR

Does an Institution that wants to apply the adjustment on its LGD estimates by partly or fully offsetting the effect of massive disposals of defaulted exposures on realised LGDs in line with Article 500 CRR have to notify the respective competent authority in accordance with Article 143 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4948
  • Topic: Model validation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Application of a currency volatility adjustment in the case of a Significant Credit Risk Transfer securitisation

Should a currency volatility adjustment – as referenced to in CRR art 264 and defined in CRR art 223 - be applied in the case in which an originator synthetically securitises a partly non-EUR FX-denominated portfolio through the issuance of a EUR denominated fully funded Credit Linked Note?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2014/05 - Guidelines on significant credit risk transfer
  • ID: 2018_3849
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Use of short-term issuer credit assessments with Article 131

May short-term issuer ratings be used to assign risk weights in the context of article 131?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4941
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Applicable treatment of fair value changes for the identification of the applicable RW to exposures in default under the Standardised Approach

In the application of Article 127 CRR, should the credit risk adjustments embedded in the fair value be considered in the calculation of the percentage of the unsecured part of the exposure value represented by credit risk adjustments?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 183/2014 - RTS for the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments
  • ID: 2018_3785
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Interpretation of the term ‘ancillary services undertaking’ as defined in point (18) of Article 4 (1) CRR with a view to ‘intermediary undertakings’

Does the term ‘ancillary services undertaking’ as defined in point (18) of Article 4 (1) CRR include undertakings that act as an intermediary of business activities (‘intermediary undertakings’ or ‘brokers’), where those business activities themselves would lead to the qualification as an ‘institution’ as referred to in point (3) or a ‘financial institution’ as referred to in point (26) of Article 4 (1) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3769
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Prudential backstop (Regulation 2019/630) and interaction with RWA calculation

Is the prudential backstop deficit under Article 151(1) taken into consideration for the calculation of risk-weighted assets on exposures treated under the advanced IRB approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4938
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Fair value changes due to changes in cross-currency basis spread eligible for CET1 capital (cost of hedging)

Are fair value changes due to changes in cross-currency basis spreads recognized in ‘other comprehensive income’, as referred to under IFRS 9 as the ‘cost of hedging’, eligible for CET1 capital under the CRR regulation?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3715
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Definition of 'explicit guarantee arrangements' for the purpose of classification of non-commercial undertakings as public sector entities

What conditions should be met by a given agreement in order to qualify as an 'explicit guarantee arrangement'?Shall the ‘explicit guarantee arrangements’ for the purpose of definition of public sector entities also be ‘guarantees’ eligible as unfunded credit protection or not?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2018_3694
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

IFRS 9 transitional arrangements – calculation of the static component in case of afterwards permission for the IRB approach

If an institution gets the permission to use the IRB approach only after 1 January 2018 or the date of initial application of IFRS 9, as applicable, how should the institution calculate the amounts for the transitional arrangements permitted by Article 473a CRR and, in particular, the static component according to paragraph 2 of Article 473a CRR for those IRB exposures to which the standardised approach applied on the 31 December 2017 or the day before the date of initial application of IFRS 9, as applicable?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4928
  • Topic: Accounting and auditing
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Classification of direct reductions in the accounting value as credit risk adjustments

For the calculation of the exposure value in accordance to Article 166(1) CRR, shall the accounting value of credit exposures on the banking book (measured at FVTPL in accordance with IFRS 9) be increased by the amount of fair value adjustments?For the purposes of the treatment of expected loss amounts in accordance to Article 159 CRR, shall the credit risk related adjustments embedded in the fair value of the banking book exposures be considered as credit risk adjustments or other own funds reductions related to these exposures? How does this interact with the calculation of exposure value in accordance with Article 166(1) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 183/2014 - RTS for the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments
  • ID: 2018_3662
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Classification of credit insurance undertakings as financial institution

Will a credit insurance undertaking whose principal activity is to issue guarantees (as listed in Annex 1 of Directive 2013/36/EC) be deemed to be a "financial institution"?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4926
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Interpretation of the term “commercial immovable property” especially “other commercial premises” for the application of the preferential risk weights for the risk weight assets purposes according to the Article 126 of the CRR.

What is the definition of “other commercial premises” as commercial immovable property in Article 126 CRR for the purposes of application of preferential risk weights for the risk weight assets purposes, if all other conditions stipulated in the CRR are met?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3615
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Treatment of claims secured on residential property collateral

As claims secured on residential property collateral are excluded from the calculation of the total amount owed, can the deduction factor be applied to these claims secured on residential property collateral even though the remaining total amount owed by the obligor (group) exceeds the EUR 1,5 million? Or does it mean that once the remaining amount owed exceeds the limit all claims by the same obligor (group) are not eligible for the deduction?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3404
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Criteria for sufficiently diversified private equity portfolios under the simple risk weight approach

What rules should be applied in assessing whether a private equity exposure is in a sufficiently diversified portfolio of portfolio companies as mentioned in Article 155(2)?In case of exposure to several private equity funds, may the portfolio companies of these private equity funds be considered as one portfolio before assessing whether the portfolio is sufficiently diversified?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3371
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022