Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Timely payment requirement for unfunded credit protection provided under credit risk insurance policies

Does unfunded credit protection - which a bank has purchased in order to hedge a loan exposure and which provides the protection-seller with the contractual right to compensate credit losses according to the original scheduled payment dates of the hedged loan - fulfil the timely payment requirement for unfunded credit protection in a situation where the loan becomes due and payable prior to the original scheduled payment dates?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3576
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/07/2019

10 % LGD floor for retail exposures secured by residential property

How should an institution, which uses the IRB approach calculate the 10 % LGD floor mentioned in Article 164(4) CRR in the case where a part of the individual exposures are guaranteed by a guarantor (institution) which is treated under the Standardised Approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3554
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/08/2020

Exposures to regional governments, local authorities or public sector entities which are treated as exposures to central governments under Articles 115 and 116 CRR

Please clarify how Article 115(2) CRR shall be applied in case regional governments and local authorities are treated under the SA by application of Article 150 CRR and central governments are treated under the IRB Approach. 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3517
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 01/03/2019

Investment firms’ exposures to credit institutions

Should MIFID investment firms which are subject to the CRR calculate the credit risk requirement for the clients’ funds (i.e. cash) deposited in a credit institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3422
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/08/2018

Treatment of claims secured on residential property collateral

As claims secured on residential property collateral are excluded from the calculation of the total amount owed, can the deduction factor be applied to these claims secured on residential property collateral even though the remaining total amount owed by the obligor (group) exceeds the EUR 1,5 million? Or does it mean that once the remaining amount owed exceeds the limit all claims by the same obligor (group) are not eligible for the deduction?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3404
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Proposals for mortgage credit extension described in Article 14 of the Directive 2014/17/EU as off-balance sheet exposures

Are the binding proposals for mortgage credit extension described in Article 14 of the Directive 2014/17/EU off-balance sheet exposures according to Annex I CRR?Should FINREP,COREP reporting include such binding proposals for mortgage credit extension?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2017_3376
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/07/2019

Use of Maturity Mismatch for Exposures arising under Master Netting Agreements

Do the requirements to adjust the value of collateral for maturity mismatch (Article 239) apply when using the supervisory volatility adjustments approach for Master Netting Agreements under Article 220?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3375
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Criteria for sufficiently diversified private equity portfolios under the simple risk weight approach

What rules should be applied in assessing whether a private equity exposure is in a sufficiently diversified portfolio of portfolio companies as mentioned in Article 155(2)?In case of exposure to several private equity funds, may the portfolio companies of these private equity funds be considered as one portfolio before assessing whether the portfolio is sufficiently diversified?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3371
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Original maturity for off balance sheet items

How is the "original maturity" identified for items in CRR Annex 1 (2)(b)(ii)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3366
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/06/2018

’Appropriate prudential requirements’ with regard to ancillary services undertakings for the assessment of the condition in Article 113(6)(a) CRR.

Clarification is sought on the term “appropriate prudential requirements” with regard to ancillary service undertakings for the assessment of Article 113 (6) (a) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3365
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Classification as off-balance sheet items of a committed reverse repo facility or other committed credit facilities where drawing under the facility is conditional upon purchasing or receiving eligible collateral

Would it be possible for an institution to assign a committed reverse repo facility, or other committed credit facility where drawing by the client is conditional to purchasing or receiving eligible collateral by the institution, to one of the risk categories as “other items also carrying [low], [medium/low], [medium] risk and as communicated by EBA”, in accordance with Article 111(1) CRR or Article 166(10) CRR and Annex I?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3332
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/11/2017

General and specific credit risk adjustments

Can a Supervised Entity not recognise changes in impairments, value adjustments or provisions in the calculation of the exposure value and thus avoid the deduction of these amounts from CET1?Or in case a Supervised Entity has changes in impairments, value adjustments or provisions, are these amounts automatically labelled as general or specific credit risk adjustments and shall therefore be accounted for in the calculation of the exposure value of an asset and deducted from CET1? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 183/2014 - RTS for the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments
  • ID: 2017_3330
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/08/2018

Effective LGD

Could effective LGD (LGD*) be used both in AIRB and FIRB if the operation has an eligible financial collateral under Financial Collateral Comprehensive method?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3304
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Definition of subordinated exposures

What is the definition for subordinated exposures within the context of article 161?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3296
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Unfunded credit risk mitigation for specialised lending exposures

How should RWA be calculated for unfunded credit risk mitigation when the protected exposure is a specialised lending exposure in respect of which an institution is not able to estimate PDs and used the risk weights in Article 153(5) CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3295
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/05/2021

Appropriate Risk Weight for purchased defaulted assets

Where an entity subject to the CRR purchased Non-Performing Loans booked at the purchase price (net book value, “NBV”), which is significantly below the loans’ gross book value (“GBV”), can the difference between GBV and NBV be treated as specific credit risk adjustment when deciding whether a risk weight of 100% (rather than 150%) applies according to Article 127 CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 183/2014 - RTS for the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments
  • ID: 2017_3270
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/09/2018

Risk weight for the credit risk for third countries with supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the Union according to Article 114(7) CRR

If a third country has supervisory and regulatory arrangements at least equivalent to those applied in the Union (such as Turkey) what risk weight for the credit risk is assigned to the exposure of this country?For example, when the Turkish competent authority assigns a 0% risk weight to the credit risk of Turkey, can this risk weight be used by a German bank? What happens when Turkey issued bonds in EUR, USD, JPY and TKY? How is the difference in the risk weight in the case the Turkish competent authority assigns a 0% risk weight to all bonds?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3262
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 22/09/2017

Application of a Permanent Partial Use exemption under Article 150(1)(d) to the European Commission

Does the permanent partial use exemption under Article 150(1)(d) of CRR encompass European organisations such as the European Commission? Does the permanent partial use exemption under Article 150(1)(d) of CRR encompass European organisations such as the European Commission?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2017_3256
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022