Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Scope of “additional registrations” as obstacles in the sense of Article 32(3) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389

Is a process that requires Third Party Providers (TPPs) to upload an electronic IDentification, Authentication and trust Services (eIDAS) certificate for receiving additional client credentials before first access to a payment account provided by an Account Servicing Payment Service Provider (ASPSP) to be considered an “additional registration” and therefore an obstacle?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2021_6029
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/12/2021

Definition of "accounting value" for the purpose of template C 80.00

Should the assets, except for the derivatives contracts,  be presented in template C 80 from Regulation (EU) 451/2021 as gross accounting value (not affected by  general and specific allowances) or as net (affected by  general and specific allowances)? 

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_6026
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/02/2023

Calculation of the relative threshold in case specific cases.

How should be calculated the relative threshold for a client who has fees or quotes in default arising from off balance sheet exposures?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/171 - RTS on the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due
  • ID: 2021_6025
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 04/04/2023

ValidationRule v11073_i

According to this validation rule v11073_i, the sheet's I 01.00 row 0090 C 0010 should be equal to the row 160 c0010 of the template C 01.00. In our opinion this VR should not be satisfied because the  row 0090 C 0010 is referred to the "Accumulated other comprehensive income" which is different from the  row 160 c0010  of the Corep "Profit or loss attributable to owners of the parent". These two cells have the same DPVID but the regulatory norms are differents. In the Corep the information about the "Accumulated other comprehensive income"  is reported in the row 180 instead of 160.  Looking also at the Annex of these two rows, it's possible to observe that  the article of the row 180 is the same  of the row 0090 C 0010 of I 01.00, both in fact refer to the Article 26(1), point (d) of CRR. Instead, the row 160 refers to another article, Articles 26(2) and 36(1) point (a) of CRR.   

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_6024
  • Topic: Supervisory Reporting - IFR Reporting framework
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 14/02/2022

Reduction of own funds according to Article 78(1)(a) CRR

If an institution applies for an own funds reduction with replacement pursuant to Article 78(1)(a) CRR, may such institution include in its own funds at the same time both the replacing instruments and the replaced instruments? Or should a request for a permission under Art 77 CRR be assessed according to Article 78(1)(b) CRR if the institution includes both the replaced and the replacing instruments at any point in time simultaneously in own funds, considering the consequent decrease of own funds that will occur when the replaced instrument is finally called back/repurchased, or redeemed?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_6022
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 26/01/2023

Exemption from and alternatives to deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items

For the purpose of Article 48(1)(a) CRR, should the applicable amount of insufficient coverage for non-performing exposures under Article 36(1)(m) CRR be included among the other points of Article 36(1) CRR considered under par. (ii) of Article 48(1)(a) CRR, even though not expressly mentioned? The same issue arises with reference to Article 46(1)(a)(ii) CRR and Article 48(1)(b)(ii) CRR.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_6021
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:

Exposures in default secured by mortgages on residential property

How to classify an exposures, that is secured by mortgages on residential property and, according to the Article 124(2) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 (CRR), is assigned a 150% risk weight and, at the same time, qualifies as 'Exposures in default' and meets the criteria listed in Article 127(1)(b) or (3) CRR, to assign it a 100 % risk weight?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_6018
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/03/2023

C_81.00 ASF from capital items and instruments

In C_81.00, ASF from capital items and instruments shall be reported before the application of prudential filters, deductions and exemption or alternatives stipulated in Articles 32 to 36, 48, 49 and 79 CRR [CET 1], Articles 56 and 79 CRR [AT1], and Articles 66 and 79 CRR [Tier 2]. However, the CRR, ITS, and supporting annexes do not indicate the applicable treatment of other types of Own Funds deductions or adjustments which originate from Articles other than the ones specified above. For example, in NSFR, should the reported amount for ‘ASF from capital items and instruments’ be reported gross or net of the deductions permitted in COREP C_01.00 rows 524, 529, 744, 748, 974 and 978? In general, clarity is being sought on two points: Whether the reported amount of CET1 in C_81.00 row 0030 is to be reported prior to all own funds deductions and adjustments, even those that emanate from provisions other than the ones explicitly stipulated in Article 428o paragraphs (a) to (c). For instance, whether the CET1 amount in C_81.00 row 0030 shall be reported gross or net of the deduction relating to the depositor compensation scheme reserve, which deduction emanates from Article 26(1) CRR. The mentioned depositor compensation scheme reserve is not an asset but an equity reserve, thus falling out of scope of RSF row 1030 “other assets”, in line with Article 428ah(1)(b) [items deducted from own funds]. Thus, clarity is being sought as to whether equity reserves are to be treated in one of the following methods: In scope of ASF row 0430 “other liabilities” by virtue of Article 428k(3)(d); In scope of ASF row 0060 “other capital instruments” pursuant to Article 428o(d); or Out of scope of ASF.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_6016
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/02/2022

Qualifying holdings outside the financial sector

How should the deduction amount of qualifying holdings outside the financial sector, referred to in Article 10(1) IFR, be understood?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_5866
  • Topic: Capital requirements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 09/06/2023

Scope of ASA definition under IFR

Should all of the assets for which an investment firm provides depositary services (under 2011/61/EU Directive) be included in the definition of assets safeguarded and administered (ASA)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2019/2033 (IFR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_5864
  • Topic: K-factor requirements
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 15/07/2022

Application of requirements for NPE prudential backstop in connection with the new COREP templates

The application of the requirements of Articles 47a, 47b and 47c of the CRR is connected with a new COREP reporting requirement for NPE loss coverage envisaged in templates C 35.01, C35.02 and C 35.03. When filling the new COREP reporting templates a several issues have appeared, that are divided into following questions: 1. Do restrictions for specific credit adjustments, which have been recognized during the financial year, apply even for calculation of NPL prudential backstop although RTS on the calculation of credit risk adjustments (RTS 183/2014) that stem from Article 110(4) of the CRR do not include Articles 47a, 47b and 47c of the CRR? 2. Does NPL definition in Article 47a of the CRR (namely requirement for calculating past due days for requirements in Articles 47a(3)(c) and second sub-paragraph, 47a(4)(c), 47a(6)(c) and second sub-paragraph, 47(7)(c)) and forbearance measures definition in Article 47b of the CRR (namely requirement for calculation of past due days for requirements in Article 47b(3)) takes into account material threshold for the assessment of materiality of a credit obligation past due as referred to in Article 178(1)(b) and the RTS 2018/171 or the past due days calculation takes into account any past due exposure of the borrower regardless of the amount?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2021_5860
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 10/03/2023

Application of NPE prudential backstop in connection with the new COREP templates

The application of the requirements of Articles 47a, 47b and 47c of the CRR is connected with a new COREP reporting requirement for NPE loss coverage envisaged in templates C 35.01, C35.02 and C 35.03. When filling that new COREP reporting templates a the following question has appeared: do all three or any of COREP 35 reporting templates include NPE for which 100% of impairments was already made, that have accounting exposure value of 0 and 100% of specific credit adjustments?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_5859
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/02/2023

Estimation of default probability and loss given default under the internal default risk model for a trading book position, where those estimates are not available at trade date under an approved IRB approach

Should an institution that has been granted permission to estimate own default probabilities or own default probabilities and losses given default in accordance with Section 1 of Chapter 3 of Title II of the CRR, be required to use such methodology for calculating default probability or loss given default under the internal default risk model for a trading book position, where the default probability or loss given default estimates are not available at trade date under such methodology for the corresponding obligor or facility?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_5856
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 18/03/2022

Scope of COREP template C34.08 only CCP exposure?

When compiling template 34.08 should Article 300(1) CRR be interpreted in the broader sense and extended also to non-Central Counterparties exposures? For example, should Initial Margin exchanged on segregated basis under bilateral agreements (EMIR) also be reported under Segregated columns? Or should the Segregated columns be used exclusively for margin exchanged with CCPs?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_5852
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/02/2022

Use of conditional sale agreements to season assets by an originator instead of the originator purchasing the assets and then selling the same to a securitisation SPE

Can an entity: (i) who manages and establishes a traditional securitisation; and (ii) where the securitisation special purpose entity (SSPE) enters into a conditional sale agreement with it be classified as the originator and act as an eligible retainer?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 2017/2402 (SecReg)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2021_5851
  • Topic: Other topics
  • Date of submission:

Display of negative interest rate in statement of fees

How should a fee corresponding to negative interest (in case of negative policy interest rate of the respective central bank) be displayed in the Statement of Fees (SoF) pursuant to Article 5 Payment Accounts Directive (PAD) and in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/33 (ITS on SoF)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/92/EU (PAD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/33 - ITS with regard to the standardised presentation format of the statement of fees
  • ID: 2021_5850
  • Topic: Payment accounts
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 22/12/2022

DPM 3.0 validation rules for C84 total RSF

According to validation rules v10158_m and v10063_m, RSF from derivatives should not be included in total required stable funding row 10 in neither column 10 nor 20. Is this really correct? It indicates that RSF from derivatives is not included in calculating the ratio then.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_5847
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/07/2021

Ability of Payee’s PSP to apply exemptions from SCA in credit transfers

Can the Payee’s Payment Services Provider (PSP) apply an exemption from strong customer authentication (SCA) in credit transfers that are initiated through the payee?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2021_5845
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 27/01/2023

Application of CRR Article 272(12) to SFT population within CoRep Template C34.02

CRR2 Requirement Application of Article 272(12) to the SFT population under IMM and FCCM approaches in derivation of the current market value for the purpose of disclosure in Taxonomy 3.0 template 34.02 - ‘current market value’ or ‘CMV’ means the net market value of all the transactions within a netting set gross of any collateral held or posted where positive and negative market values are netted in computing the CMV. Reporting requirement The EBA ITS instructions state that the Current Market Value (CMV), positive should represent the Sum of the current market values (CMV) of all the netting sets with positive CMV as defined in Article 272(12) CRR and the Current Market Value (CMV), Negative the sum of the absolute current market values (CMV) of all the netting sets with negative CMV as defined in Article 272(12) CRR. It has been noted that the article reference – 272(12) is specifically tied to the standardised method and therefore does not apply to other methodologies for CCR However the EBA have extended the application of said article under CRR2 to cover all calculation approaches. Neither the CRR2 text or the reporting requirements provide sufficient clarity on how the current market value should be derived for the SFTs – a concept that is not recognised as a capital measure in assessing the counterparty credit risk for security financing trades. For SA-CCR this would be a relevant parameter, but from a firm perspective we do not use SA-CCR for our repos, only IMM or FCCM (so either Article 220 or 223).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2021_5843
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/02/2022

Inclusion of Held for sale in Other adjustments in template F 12.01

Where shall the changes in allowances for financial assets, which have been reclassified as held for sale prior to a disposal, be reported in FINREP template F 12.01?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2021_5840
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 10/09/2021