Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

FINREP - Contents of template F 40.1 Group structure "entity-by-entity" - Col 160 "Carrying amount" should be higher than 0

Template F40.01 requires carrying amount higher than 0. As a principle of consolidation, enterprises over which the Group exercises significant influence (associates) are accounted for by the equity method. If the Group’BNP Paribas'share of losses of an equity-method entity equals or exceeds the carrying amount of its investment in this entity, the Group discontinues including its share of further losses. The investment is reported at nil value ans respect in this case the control in FINREP template 40.1 concerning the carrying amount. But the Group BNP Paribas consolidated also controlled but non material entities under equity method. In these cases the carrying amount is not reported at nil, due to the fact that the Group is fully involved in the entity. Is it possible to modifiy the control to authorize negative carrying amount under the condition that a comment is reported in a dedicated cell?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 530/2014 - RTS on materiality of thresholds for internal approaches to specific risk in the trading book
  • ID: 2015_2170
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

Treatment of Eligible CRM CDS for Leverage Ratio

Should credit derivatives subject to the CRR Article 273(3) which have zero exposure value for counterparty credit risk purposes also be treated as having zero value for the Leverage ratio exposure measure under CRR Article 429c(1)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/62 - DR with regard to the leverage ratio
  • ID: 2015_2165
  • Topic: Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/05/2016

Definition of Aggregate Liabilities

Does the term ‘Aggregate Liabilities’ referred to in Article 415(2)(a), refers solely to ‘Liabilities’ or does it refer to ‘Liabilities and Equity’?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2015_2158
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Minority interests

Are minority interests that arise from a bank subsidiary (as in the example), which are indirectly attributable to third parties, eligible at the EU parent consolidated level?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2157
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/04/2016

Minority interests

According to Article 84 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) institutions shall determine the amount of minority interests of a subsidiary to be included in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital. This is calculated by subtracting the excess of Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the subsidiary attributable to minority interests from the total amount of minority interests of that undertaking. In the formula considered under Article 84(1)(a) CRR, how should Common Equity Tier 1 deductions be taken into account when computing this excess?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2155
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/03/2017

FINREP – Non-performing probation period start date on forborne exposures

Clarification is requested surrounding non-performing probation periods where forbearance precedes classification of non-performance. Scenario 1) T0 - A customer’s performing exposure has a concession event applied and is classified as performing forborne and begins the 2 year performing assessment. 2) T1 - At a later date the customer becomes non-performing through criteria in paragraph 145 (e.g. “material exposures which are more than 90 days past-due”) (not by paragraph 179 as deemed not applicable in Q&A 2014_736) and is classified as non-performing forborne. 3) T2 – Customer exits non-performing criteria. In the above scenario at which point would non-performing probation period start from? a) The non-performing probation period starts from T0, the date of where the forbearance measure is extended. i.e. Probation starts from before the exposure is classified as non-performing; b) Non-performing probation period starts from T1; c) Non-performing probation period starts from T2; or d) There is no non-performing probation period which contradicts Q&A 2014_735. It has been confirmed by the EBA in Q&A 2014_735 that a non-performing probation period is required in the scenario.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2146
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

FINREP – Non-performing exposures during performing probation period

Clarification is requested surrounding non-performing probation periods. Scenario If a customer 19s exposure has previously had a concession event and has been classified as non-performing then they shall serve a 1 year non-performing probation period from the date of the concession event followed by a 2 year performing probation period (on the assumption they met all the exit criteria from non-performing probation). If the customer re-enters non-performing classification during the 2 year performing probation period, through: 1) Going more than 30 days past due; or 2) Non-performing as per any of the criteria per paragraph 145. a) Will the customer serve another 1 year non-performing probation? And if so, when would that non-performing probation period start from, as there has not been a new forbearance measure? b) Or would the customer go straight to a new 2 year performing probation period on the exit of non-performing criteria? Note: The scenario where customer becomes non-performing again due to a new concession event being issued (paragraph 179) is intentionally excluded from the above query. It is believed by the institution that this could only follow option a) above with a new non-performing probation period starting from the date of the new concession event.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2145
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 15/04/2016

FINREP Template F 16.07 - Accumulated Impairment

Validation rule v3956_s requires all values presented in column 040 (Accumulated impairment) of template F 16.07 to be negative. The row labels on rows 060 and 100 state “Impairment or (-) reversal of impairment”. As a result, column 040, presented negative, appears to only allow the disclosure of accumulated net reversals of impairments. Please could we receive clarification that this validation is correct?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2143
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

FINREP Template F 40.01

Annex V Part II paragraph 296 (f) of Commission Implementing Regulatio (EU) No 680/2014 states of  “”Equity of Investee”, “Total assets of the Investee” and “Profit or (loss) of the Investee” include the amounts of these items in the last financial statements of the investee.” Does this refer to the latest set of financial statements of the investee which have been approved by the investee’s board of directors, or similarly authorised committee?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2141
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

FINREP Templates F 01.02 and F 43.00

The closing balance of pending legal issues and tax litigation provisions is presented on both row 210 of template F 01.02 and column 040 of template F 43.00. However the guidance reference differs between the two templates. Please confirm which set of guidance should be followed?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2140
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

Reporting currency as closely correlated currency

Is a position in a currency that is closely correlated to an institution’s reporting currency eligible for the treatment as a position in a closely correlated currency according to Article 354 (1), (4) to (6) CRR under the standardised approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2139
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/06/2016

Risk weight of exposures with QCCPs

Is it possible to use a risk weight according to Article 107(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) for trade exposures with a clearing member, where the institution is a client of a qualifying CCP, which is acting as a general clearing member of a non-qualifying CCP?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 - RTS on non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach
  • ID: 2015_2138
  • Topic: Market infrastructures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/01/2017

Reporting of past due exposures

How to determine when an exposure is past due? In Legal acts there are two different explanations. 1. According to Annex V. Part 2, paragraph 48 Assets qualify as past due when counterparties have failed to make a payment when contractually due. It is understood that any overdue payment shall be taken into account (including penalties). 2. According to EBA/ITS/2013/03/rev1, paragraph 150 For the purpose of template 18, an exposure is “past-due” when any amount of principal, interest or fee has not been paid at the date it was due (excluding penalties).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2137
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/10/2019

Undrawn credit facility from central bank as inflow

Can you please confirm that any undrawn credit facility from a central bank counts as a liquidity inflow within the meaning of Article 32 of the LCR delegated act with a 100% inflow rate according to paragraph 2 of Article 32 of the delegated act, provided that there is no double counting with liquid assets and is not taken into account under Article 34 of the delegated act?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 - DR with regard to liquidity coverage requirement
  • ID: 2015_2136
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Capital requirements deduction for credit risk on exposures to SMEs

Is capital requirement deduction (SME factor) applicable for specialised lending exposures if conditions determined in Article 501(2) of Regulation No 575/2013 (CRR) are met?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2135
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 01/04/2016

Inconsistency between Annex II C 14.00, column 190 and DTS categorisation of COREP C 14.00, ei86 measure.

In return C 14.00, the Annex II states that ‘If no country exceeds a 20 % threshold based on the amount of assets/liabilities, then ‘OT’ (other) shall be reported.’This would imply that ei86 must report ‘OT’ value.Measure ei86 has link to GA domain, GA4 hierarchy.The GA4 doesn't contain ‘OT’ member. It contains eba_x28 - Other Countries member.We believe there to be an inconsistency between the GA4 hierarchy and the Annex II.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2131
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/08/2017

Own funds for foreign branches

Consider, for example, a branch in the EU or EEA that belongs to an institution that is located outside the EU and EEA. According to the general requirements of Article 47 (1) CRD IV that were transposed by the relevant member state, the branch may have to meet separate CRR own funds requirements. To this end, the institution allocates own funds to the branch. Does the branch have to include its own funds in the overall net foreign-exchange position according to Article 352 (4) CRR, if they are denominated in a currency other than the local currency of the member state where the branch is located?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2130
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Design of Templates for 3-year horizon

The guideline provides Templates for 3-year horizon with 5 columns:Actual Current Position (e.g. end 2013)Planned 6 month Position (e.g. H1 2014)Planned Year 1 Position (e.g. end 2014)Planned Year 2 Position (e.g. end 2015)Planned Year 3 Position (e.g. end 2016)For the year 2015 institutions report their funding plans with the reference date (Actual Current Position) 30 June 2015.For subsequent years institutions report their funding plans with the reference date 31 December of previous year. Our understanding is that for the year 2016 FP templates should be designed as follows:Actual Current Position (end 2015)Planned Year 1 Position (end 2016)Planned Year 2 Position(end 2017)Planned Year 3 Position (end 2018)We are not sure if our understanding of FP templates for the 2016 and further (without Planned 6 month Position (H1 2016) is correct?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2014/04 - Guidelines on harmonised definitions and templates for funding plans of credit institutions - repealed by EBA/GL/2019/05
  • ID: 2015_2127
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Funding Plans
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 29/07/2016

Label of column 140 in C07.00 and validation rule v0008_h

Validation rule v0008_h checks whether values reported in column 140 are higher than values reported in column 130.According to the instructions of column 140, the value reported shall consist of the volatility and maturity adjustments of the value of the collateral and is therefore not a part of the value of column 130. This makes it necessary to remove the text “of which” from column 140 which implies a subset of column 130.Therefore shall the title of column 140 be adjusted to ‘Volatility and maturity adjustments’? Shall validation rule v0008_h be deleted since the value in column 140 can be higher or lower than the value in column 130 and DPM hierarchy be amended?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2125
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/10/2018

Transfer of covered deposits as a substitute to reimbursement

Can resolution authorities take resolution action, e.g. a transfer of the deposit book, restoring access to covered deposits, even after such access has been interrupted and the conditions laid down in Article 2(1)(8) of Directive 2014/49/EU (DGSD) are met?In such a case, what is the effect of such action on the obligation of the DGS under Article 8(1) DGSD (repayment obligation) and 109(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) (contribution in resolution)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2123
  • Topic: Interactions with the DGS and the BRRD
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/08/2016