Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Alternative treatment of the exposure measure: Notional amount

How do we have to report the notional of derivatives, do we have to sum up all derivatives in absolute value?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_396
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 22/08/2014

Scope of LE5 template: Maturity buckets of the 10 largest exposures to institutions and the 10 largest exposures to unregulated financial entities: detail of the exposures to individual clients within groups of connected clients

Is there a threshold foreseen to fill in this table? Or do we have to fill in all the exposures on individual clients, who belong to a group of connected clients (that need to be reported in template 'LE4'?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_395
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/04/2014

Scope of LE3 template: Details of the exposures to individual clients within groups of connected clients

Is there a threshold foreseen to fill in this table? Or do we have to fill in all the exposures on individual clients, who belong to a group of connected clients?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_394
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Geographical breakdown of CR IP Losses

Is there a threshold foreseen to fill in the template by country? Or do we need to give the data by each country (even if it is not material)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_393
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Reporting of information with geographical breakdown

Is there a threshold foreseen to report a country, or do we need to send the information for all the countries on which we have an exposure?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_391
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Reporting of the net DTA that are dependent on future profitability and arise from temporary differences that are not deducted and will be risk weighted at 250%

For the net DTA that are dependent on future profitability and arise from temporary differences that are not deducted and will be risk weighted at 250%, where should we report the RWA?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_390
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/03/2014

Capital charge for credit derivatives in the banking book in the position of protection seller

In Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) we assume that for credit derivatives in the banking book in the position of protection seller the present capital charge is calculated only for credit risk with respect to the underlying and no extra capital charge for counterparty credit risk after CRR is needed. Do you agree?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_387
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/11/2013

C 51.00 Liquid assets - reporting of intransferable liquidity surpluses

How should surpluses of liquidity held by local legal entities be reported, if these can not be freely transferred to the consolidated entity in times of stress?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_386
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 22/08/2014

Application of Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) at consolidated level

What is the treatment at consolidated level of AT1 instruments issued by a third country subsidiary where the 5.125% CET1 conversion/write down trigger that refers only to the subsidiary CET1 ratio? To the effect of this calculation, which definition should be used, the one in the home country law or the one of the host country law?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_385
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/10/2014

Inclusion of interim profits / Deduction of losses in own funds

1. How should the interim profits be calculated for the purposes of inclusion in own funds? E.g. if the bank has monthly P/L as follows: Jan -10, Feb -20, March +100 (Year-to-date +70). The results are not verified by external audit. Should the bank take deduct the losses from Jan and Feb, but ignore the March gain as it is unaudited (capital impact compared to IFRS equity -100) or can the losses be netted with the gains and the YTD gain (unaudited) be filtered out (capital impact -70)? 2. What constitutes 'adequate level of assurance' in context of verification by external auditors? Is a full audit required or is an interim review sufficient?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_384
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Inclusion of insurance undertakings in prudential consolidation

Should an insurance undertaking be included in prudential consolidation according to Art. 18 of CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_383
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Inclusion of ancillary services undertakings in prudential consolidation

Should the ancillary services undertakings be included in prudential consolidation according to Article 18 and 19 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_382
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/04/2014

Netting Methodologies

Does the EBA intend to issue guidance on the appropriate netting methodologies to be applied. For example, should netting take into account criteria such as currency, cash flow date, product etc. or should a more simplistic approach be used, e.g. adding all the inflows and outflows occurring within the 30 day timeframe to produce a net figure to be reported either as payable to receivable.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_381
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Reporting treatment of forward starting trades

Further clarification on the reporting treatment of forward starting trades would be appreciated. A forward starting trade will have two cash flows, one at the start and one at the maturity of the trade. For example, a forward starting deposit will have an inflow at the start to reflect the deposit being received, while an outflow at maturity to reflect the repayment of the deposit. It is not clear, however, how the flows should be reported.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_380
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/03/2014

Inclusion of transactions between trade and settlement dates

We would welcome clarification on the reporting of transactions between trade and settlement dates. Firms apply typically a contractual approach which results in inflows and outflows being grossed up and subject to the 75% inflow cap - this means that a liquid asset requirement of 25% applies to trades that settle to a zero position or have a net cash flow of zero. For example, a bank might enter a trade to purchase a $100m bond from counterparty A, settlement at t+3. The bank also enters into an addition trade to sell the same bond to counterparty B with settlement also occurring at t+3. Both cash flows will occur on day 3 and net to zero and the balance sheet position will also be zero. However, if the inflows and outflows were reported separately then the 75% inflow cap would apply.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_378
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/04/2014

ITS reporting - Group Solvency - Applicable only at top conso level

Could you confirm that this table is applicable only at top conso level only, ie it is not required to report this in sub-consolidated reports

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_377
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Definition of Investments in Private Equity

Do investments in private equity referred to under Article 128(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 only relate to investments in CIU?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_374
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/10/2014

Reporting of amounts 'representing claims or guaranteed by multilateral development banks'

There appears a possible inconsistency in relation to the reporting of Row 610 on the outflows template 'representing claims on or guaranteed by multilateral development banks' and the corresponding instructions. In particular, the instructions make reference to 'representing claims on, or claims guaranteed by, the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the European Financial Stability Facility, the European Stability Mechanism or multilateral development bank' and not therefore only multilateral development banks. Can the EBA advise whether there is an error in the reporting template or instructions or whether this is indeed intended to be the case?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_373
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/02/2014

Valuation of qualifying holdings outside the financial sector for the purposes of Article 89 of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013

What is the correct valuation to determine the 15% threshold of the eligible capital under Article 89(1) of Regulation (EU) No, 575/2013? Are the provisions of Article 4(77) also relevant for this purpose or should it be generally the amortized cost?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_367
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/01/2014