Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Reporting of Additions (c010) and Reversals (c020) in Table 16.7

In Table 16.7, Additions (010) and Reversals (c020) of impairment on financial and non-financial assets is required to be reported. In accordance with ITS 2. 102, “Additions” shall be reported when, for the accounting portfolio or main category of assets, the estimation of the impairment for the period results in recognition of net expenses. “Reversals” shall be reported when, for the ac-counting portfolio or main category of assets, the estimation of the impairment for the period result in the recognition of net income. We interpret the rule above as the additions and reversals (columns 010 and 020 re-spectively) shall be reported NET, NOT gross (for the accounting portfolio or main category of assets). This means that, if the net of the asset impairment for the period is positive (net income) it should be listed as a reversal, and, if negative (net expense), it should be listed as additions. Does it imply, for example for T 16,7 row 030 (Available-for-sale financial assets), if for all available for sale fin assets held by the reporting entity, the impairments for the period exceeded reversals, only net impairment (net of reversals) are to be recorded (and the reversals will be reported blank)? Or is the netting rule only applicable to a sub-portfolio of assets within Available-for-sale financial assets class (e.g. municipal bonds). If the netting rule is applicable for an entire fin asset class group (e.g. Available-for-sale financial assets), the reporting in table 16,7 should equal to the reporting in Table 2, row 480. Please clarify.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_975
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2015

LCR Sign Convention

What sign convention has to be applied for outflows? Should they be reported as positive or negative figures?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_971
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/10/2014

Risk Weights for International Organisations

Could you please advise what risk weight/treatments should be applied to International Organisations that are not included in Article 118 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_968
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 10/10/2014

Application transitional provisions: Deduction half from Tier 1 and half from Tier 2

The residual amount of specific items (e.g. point (d) of Article 36(1) CRR) shall be deducted half from Tier 1 items and half from Tier 2 items during transitional provisions (see for example 472 (6) and (11) CRR). Please specify the calculation logic to be considered by CRR users.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_986
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/07/2014

Transitional adjustments in regards to Goodwill in CA5.1

Please specify where to report the transitional adjustments in regards to Goodwill in CA.5.1 (Transitional provisions).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_966
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 16/01/2015

Datos C.15.00 / data C 15.00

Original Question:Cuándo se habla de pérdidas se incluyen las dotaciones específicas? Translated Question:Do ‘losses’ include specific provisions?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_961
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 15/04/2016

CR GB 2 - Row 140 – Total exposures

Does the ‘Total exposures’ row in the CR GB 2 template include or exclude ‘Equity’ exposures (row 140)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_959
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/09/2014

Inclusion of additional value adjustments in the IRB treatment of expected loss

In CRR article 159 we read the following: "Institutions shall subtract the expected loss amounts calculated in accordance with Article 158 (5), (6) and (10) from the general and specific credit risk adjustments and additional value adjustments in accordance with Articles 34 and 110 and other own funds reductions related to these exposures." Due to the wording and the grammatical structure of the above sentence we are having doubts as to which amounts should actually be used in the IRB treatment of expected losses.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_950
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/07/2014

Eligible hedge of Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA)

Please provide additional guidance on the scope of "other equivalent hedging instruments referencing the counterparty directly"

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_949
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 05/06/2015

Annexe XV and Template F 03.00: data point in r030-c010 doesn't sum up the data point in r090-c010.

For report F 03.00, data point 3.0_030_010 is calculated as a sum of data points 3.0_040_010 through 3.0_090_010.So by right, data point 3.0_030_010 is a parent of 3.0_090_010 ( take note that this is not a validation but just how the point is calculated on the report) If you look at the data point definition, 3.0_030_010 is defined as follows AT_md103 BA_x1 MC_x182 BT_x2 and 3.0_090_010 is defined as follows: AT_md103 BA_x1 MC_x336 BT_x2 The only member who is different is in the MCY dimension - MC_x182 vs MC_x336 However, on inspecting the hierarchy in dimension MCY, x182 and x336 are both children to the parent x282. So if x182 has a condition flowing in, it cannot be mapped to x336 since they both sit at the same level (as children to x282).

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_948
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 15/04/2016

Annex XV - Validation formulae and FINREP F 02.00

Validation rule v1699_m {r355} = {r010} - {r090} - {r150} + {r160} + {r200} - {r210} + {r220} + {r280} + {r285} + {r290} + {r295} + {r300} + {r310} + {r320} + {r330} + {r340} - {r350}{r300} is accounting hedge. Moreover the formula includes {r310} which is 'exchange differences net' as well as {r340} which is 'other operating income'. This makes sense as typically 'net operating income= all operating income - all operating expenses' but the dimension hierarchy does not capture this. Accounting hedge [dim:MCY|x4] {r300} and Exchange differences [dim:MCY|x150] {r310} should be under [dim:MCY|x501] in the MCY hierarchy. Secondly even though expenses are reduced from total, they should still be under x501 in our opinion. It looks incorrect to put expenses at the same level as x501.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_947
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/09/2014

Short Positions in Asset Encumbrance

Should the short positions be reported in Asset Encumbrance? Taking into account that a short positions generated due to the sale of a received collateral is considered to be a liability for the reporting entity, seems plausible to include them in template F32.04, specifically in row 070 (collateralized deposits other than repurchase agreements). Nevertheless, this could imply that validations of this template with FINREP are not fulfilled; {F 32.04.a, r070,c010} <= sum({F 08.01.a, r050, (c010-035)}) - xsum({F 08.01.a, (r100, r150, r200, r250, r300, r350, c010-035)}). Notwithstanding, should be pointed out that FINREP's F1.2 Liabilities template has a specific row for short positions (row 030), this reinforces the belief that maybe short positions are not required in Asset Encumbrance reporting or that the F32.04 lacks a row for this category.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_946
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/06/2021

Table 11.1 - notional amount of derivatives used in two hedge relationshops (fair value and cash flow hedges)

Reporting of notional amount of derivative in more than one hedge relationship: If a derivative (e.g. cross currency swap) is used in two hedging relationships (fair value hedge and cash flow hedge), how should the notional amount of the cross currency swap be reported in Table 11.1? Should the notional of the derivative be reported: a) only once- allocated to one hedge relationship b) reported two times (double reporting)- in both hedge relationship types c) allocated and reported in both hedge relatioship types

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_944
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Choice of method for commodities risk when an entity has 2 different business lines

Is it possible for an entity to chose 2 different methods of calculating requirement for commodities risk whereby the entity has 2 individual business lines that are seperated from each other. 1 being Futures, Options and OTC derivatives and the other being a pure Stock Financing book?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_940
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/09/2014

Additional Reporting templates for FINREP (large exposures)

On January 8, 2014 European Commission published an updated Draft Implementing Technical Standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (attached). Per the article 9 of the document, paragraph (g) as well as article 11 paragraph (g), European Commission stated the following: (g) the information specified in Annex VIII for exposures whose exposure value is larger than or equal to 300 million EUR but less than 10 % of the institution’s eligible capital with a quarterly frequency. Questions: 1) The specification above deviates from the current requirements for large exposures, as described per the instructions in Annex IX (ITS), as paragraph (g) requires the reporting of exposures less than 10 % of the institution’s eligible capital. (Whereas Annex IX requires reporting of exposures equal to or exceeding 10% of the institution’s eligible capital (Article 392 CRR). Does this imply that the templates specified in Annex VIII of ITS, which currently refer to Large Exposures, and which are reported under COREP, should be also included in the FINREP financial reporting? 2) As the templates currently specified in Annex VIII of ITS have some of the same references already reported in FINREP (for example, tables 30-31), will EBA be issuing an updated Annex VIII only as applicable for FINREP. If yes, when these temples will be available/when are the institutions expected to report them?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_939
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 16/01/2015

Reglamento 575/2013 exposiciones garantizadas hipotecas sobre bienes inmuebles/ Exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property

La parte de la exposición que supere el valor hipotecario dice que le será asignada la ponderación de riesgo aplicable a las exposiciones no garantizadas de la contraparte implicada. Si la contraparte es minorista, cómo puede ser que la parte de la exposición que supere el valor hipotecario vaya ponderada al 75% y la parte que va entre el 80% y el 100% del valor hipotecario vaya ponderada al 100%? ENGLISH TRANSLATION: In Article 124 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) it says that the part of the exposure which exceeds the mortgage value shall be assigned the risk weight applicable to the unsecured exposures of the counterparty involved. If the counterparty is retail, can you explain how the part of the exposure which exceeds the mortgage value shall have a weight of 75% and the part which goes from 80% through 100% of the mortgage value shall have a weight of 100%?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_936
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/12/2014

Calculation of the own funds requirements for market risk for positions in specific instruments, e.g. weather derivatives, emission certificates and inflation-linked products

How should the own funds requirements for market risk be determined for positions in certain instruments whose main market risks are not covered by the own funds requirements pursuant to Part Three, Title IV of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_934
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 19/09/2014

Annex XV Validation rule v0559m does not match the Taxonomy 2.0.1 validation being excuted

Rules Annex XV Rules v0559_m Annex XV The annex lists T1 = C 16.00 a & T2 = C 02.00 What the taxonomy validation is doing Actual validation is taxonomy is referring only to C 02..00 and then checking if same value is same. Issue Validation is not working as it is checking same number

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_927
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/09/2014

Inconsistency between the definition of "accumulated impairment" in paragraphs 46 and 161

Does the definition of "accumulated impairment" includes only allowances as defined in paragraph 46 of Annex V (i.e. FINREP instructions) or both allowances and write-offs taken to Income Statement, as defined in paragraph 161 of the document EBA FINAL draft Implementing Technical Standards On Supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures under article 99(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_926
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/10/2014