Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

COREP V2.8 - C32.02 - Prudent Valuation : Fall back Approach

Should the detail of fair value adjustments for the Core approach be reported in the information for the fall back approach?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4555
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/04/2021

Control v6363_m - Number of days of the prudent exit period ?

Could you confirm that this control must be deleted or that the number of days is more or equal to zero (and not ten) ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4553
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 20/01/2022

Reporting of template C71.00 by significant currency

How is template C71.00 (concentration of counterbalancing capacity by counterparty) to be completed in the context of the reporting by significant currency (as referred to in Article 415(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR))? Specifically, are exposures in a significant currency going to rise in the ranking when being reported by significant currency (given that items denominated in a different currency will be disregarded in the separate currency reporting)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4550
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/09/2019

Classification of multilateral development banks (MDBs) for the purpose of the reporting of the Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics (ALMM)

For the purpose of the reporting of the ALMM, are MDBs to be considered as financial counterparties, non-financial corporate counterparties or other counterparties?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4549
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/09/2019

Insurance policy on minimum monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance of PSD2

If an e-money payment institution (for the purpose of new PSD2 services - Payment Initiation Service Provider (PISP) and Account Information Service Provider (AISP) in line with insurance industry standards signed an insurance policy with insurance company for several thousand/million euros with franchise deductible (e.g. in the amount of 25k EUR), fulfills adequate capital requirements and is being regularly monitored by the regulator (local central bank), does the above mentioned insurance policy violate guidelines rule that the insurance policy should not have any excess, deductible or any threshold that could prejudice repayments or do we understand it correctly that such insurance policy does not in any case prejudice that potential refunds requests will not be refunded and it as such fulfills guideline requirements? We understand that such insurance does not prejudice any repayments.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2017/08 - Guidelines on the criteria on how to stipulate the minimum monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • ID: 2019_4542
  • Topic: Monetary amount of the professional indemnity insurance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/07/2020

COREP C06.01 template - Consistency of the EBA taxonomy control v6288_m

Is the control v6288_m consistent with the COREP ITS?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4537
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/07/2019

COREP C 14.00 template - Consistency of the EBA taxonomy control v4801_m

Is the control v4801_m consistent with the COREP ITS?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4535
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 17/07/2020

Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) possession element requirement for cryptographic validation

For a device to be considered possession:-a) should the device perform "cryptographically underpinned validity assertions using keys or cryptographic material stored in" the device?b) should the device be in the physical possession of the  Payment Service User (PSU)? I.e. it cannot be held and operated remotely.

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2018/389 - RTS on strong customer authentication and secure communication
  • ID: 2019_4532
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 24/07/2020

Include all entities which belong to a group of connected clients in Large exposure templates

Should credit institution report all entities which belong to a group of connected clients in their C 29.00 template, including those which do not have any direct or indirect exposure with this credit institution?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) 2021/451 – ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions
  • ID: 2019_4525
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/11/2021

Col 040 of Corep: C 32.04 - Prudent Valuation: Concentrated Positions AVA (PRUVAL 4) report

As per article 14 (details available below), col 040 of Corep C32.04 report is quite subjective. But to the best of our interpretation can we say that its a percentage value and is computed as Col 040 = ( CONCENTRATED POSITIONS AVA (Col 080) / Total CONCENTRATED POSITIONS AVA )* 100

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2019_4519
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/04/2021

Transactions in the banking book where no strike is available

For a put option in the non-trading book, where there is no guaranteed minimum payment and the price will only be determined after the occurrence of specified events i.e. there is no strike price for the put option, how would the notional amount be calculated in accordance with Article 15(f)(1)(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) No 241/2014? Should the notional be determined based on an equity delta equivalent amount?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 241/2014 - RTS for Own Funds requirements for institutions
  • ID: 2019_4517
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 01/04/2022

Eligibility of convertible instruments as financial collateral

Do financial instruments that are not included in a main index and not traded on a recognised exchange, but which can be converted anytime at the discretion of the owner of the instrument into equities that are included in a main index or are traded on a recognised exchange qualify as eligible financial collateral?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4509
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:

Content of eIDAS certificates if agents or outsource providers are involved

Who shall be the Subject Distinguished Name (DN) in the situation described in EBA Opinion on eIDAS (EBA-Op-2018-7) item 21? Does information on agents or outsource providers has to show up in the certificates? 

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4507
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/04/2019

Technical past due situation - Factoring

How should the situation in terms of technical default be treated when there are two past due purchased receivables (each individually material) and one of them is repaid by the obligor while the second one is still due?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2016/07 - Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 CRR
  • ID: 2019_4505
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/02/2021

Calculation of past due days on material credit obligations

For the purpose of the definition of default, should days when material credit obligation was past due, but repaid later on, be included in the calculation of 90 (180) consecutive days according to Article 178 of CRR, paragraph 1, point (b)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4504
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 12/02/2021

Applicability of Look through Approach to SPV (Article 132 CRR)

May the look-through approach be applied for exposures in Notes issued by a special purpose vehicle, with no tranches, - which is unclear whether it qualifies as an undertaking for collective investment according to the applicable national law -, where the paid out of the each Note are the net proceeds of the loan receivables portfolio allocated to such Note (provided the additional requirements set for the look through approach are duly met)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4502
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/07/2021

Article 395 CRR – Shadow entities large exposure limits

If a bank invests through a vehicle, incorporated under the applicable Securitisation Law, with separate compartments per investor and where the paid out of each Note is segregated per portfolio of loans, may each Note be deemed a separate shadow entity?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: EBA/GL/2015/20 - Guidelines on limits on exposures to shadow banking entities which carry out banking activities outside a regulated framework under Article 395(2) of CRR
  • ID: 2019_4501
  • Topic: Large exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 15/01/2021

Requirements for the usability of an ECAI within the framework of the Internal Assessment Approach pursuant to Article 259(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – before amendments introduced by Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2401 - and Article 265 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as amended by Regulation (EU) No 2017/2401. - Anforderungen an die Verwendbarkeit einer ECAI im Rahmen des internen Bemessungsansatzes gemäß Artikel 259 Absatz 3 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 – in der Fassung vor den durch die Verordnung (EU) 2017/2401 eingeführten Änderungen – und Artikel 265 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 in der durch die Verordnung (EU) 2017/2401 geänderten Fassung

Is it possible to use published ECAI methods within the framework of the Internal Assessment Approach pursuant to Article 259(3) CRR and Article 265 CRR – as amended by Regulation (EU) No 2017/2401-, in consideration that neither in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/1801 nor in Q&A 4274 there is a reconciliation requirement specifically applicable to securitisation positions from rating grades to credit quality steps pursuant to Article 261 CRR (as not amended) and Articles 263 and 264 CRR (as amended by Regulation (EU) No 2017/2401)? Ist es möglich, im Rahmen des internen Bemessungsansatzes gemäß Artikel 259 Absatz 3 CRR und Artikel 265 CRR – in der durch die Verordnung (EU) 2017/2401 geänderten Fassung – von ECAI veröffentlichte Methoden zu verwenden, im Hinblick darauf, dass weder die Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/1801 noch die Q&A 4274 ein spezifisch auf Verbriefungspositionen anwendbares Erfordernis der Abstimmung von Ratingklassen auf Bonitätsstufen gemäß Artikel 261 CRR (in der nicht geänderten Fassung) sowie Artikel 263 und 264 CRR (in der durch die Verordnung (EU) 2017/2401 geänderten Fassung) enthalten?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4500
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/05/2021

Treatment of exposure for unsettled repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements

For leverage ratio calculation purposes, it is asked to clarify the exposures to be recognized for both repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, with specific reference to unsettled transactions.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/62 - DR with regard to the leverage ratio
  • ID: 2019_4499
  • Topic: Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as Rejected Q&A: 11/02/2022

Revocation of future dated Payment Initiation Services (PIS) payments

Is the Bank (an ‘Account Servicing Payment Service Provider’(ASPSP)) prohibited under PSD2 from acting on the following unsolicited customer instruction:- Customer asks their Bank to cancel a future-dated payment, or a series of recurring future-dated payments - where the original consent for the payment(s) was given by the customer to a Payment Initiation Services Provider (PISP).In this scenario, is the Bank required to advise the customer that the Bank cannot accept the customer’s instruction to revoke these future payments; and that only a revocation instruction received via the PISP can be accepted by the Bank?

  • Legal act: Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2019_4496
  • Topic: Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 03/12/2021