Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Applicability of the transitional period under Article 124(3) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013

According to Article 124(3) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 (CRR), institutions should have a 6-month transitional period to apply higher risk weights set by the competent or designated authorities to exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property.Should this transitional period also apply if the national authority decides under CRR to set risk weights at the same level and to the same extent, i.e. for the same kind of exposures that are currently set under CRD (so in fact such decision would not result in a higher capital requirements for banks in comparison to current national legislation)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_361
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/01/2014

Eligibility of index CDS hedges in Advanced CVA charge

Please can you confirm whether Basel FAQ 2c7 published in December 2012 on page 19 of BCBS's FAQ (http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs237.pdf) is applicable under CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_360
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/02/2014

Own funds: Value adjustments for prudent valuation (Additional Value Adjustments)

Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) requires institutions to deduct from CET1 the amount of any additional value adjustments on all assets measured at fair value calculated in accordance with a prudent valuation of these assets based on the provisions specified in Article 105 of CRR. In this context, paragraph 14 of Article 105 of CRR specifies that EBA shall submit draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to the Commission by 28 July 2013 (as per CRR corrigendum published on 2 August 2013). In this regard the EBA published a draft consultation paper (EBA/CP/2013/28) whereby it is specified that "as a consequence of the EBA decision to conduct a QIS, the EBA currently envisages to finalise the technical standard in Q2 2014". On 7 October 2013 the EBA published revised deadlines for the delivery of the technical standards to the European Commission; in particular it is specified that the revised deadline for the submission of the RTS on prudent valuation (Article 105(14) CRR) has been postponed to 1 June 2014. Therefore it is not clear as concerns the first reporting date on Q12014 whether institutions must: 1) not apply the prudential filter (i.e. the relative reporting item shall be valued zero) until the publication of the final EBA RTS 2) calculate the prudential filter in accordance with the Basel II framework (i.e. requirements for prudent valuation defined by each local regulator) 3) calculate the prudential filter in accordance with the draft EBA standards as defined in consultation paper EBA/CP/2013/28

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_359
  • Topic: Market risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/11/2013

Operational risk

Article 95 (3) in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) has a reference to Title VII, Chapter 3, Section II, Sub-section 1 of Directive 2013/36/EU. From reviewing Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD) there are no sub-sections of the above mentioned Section II. Section II which starts with Article 119 regards Financial holding companies etc. In light of this the reference to the CRD in Article 95 (3) of the CRR does not seem to be correct, could the EBA please provide guidance?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_358
  • Topic: Operational risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 08/11/2013

LCR outflow to report for shorts under Article 423(4) of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 (CRR)

We assume we should be symmetrical in terms of the outflow reported for shorts (to be delivered within 30 days) and the inflows reported for the corresponding short covering trades (reverse repo/stock borrow) that mature within 30 days, since the two transactions are reported gross and independently of each other, and it is the maturity of the reverse repo/stock borrow that gives rise to the need to deliver within 30 days. We believe that the outflow to report under Article 423(4) of the CRR should be weighted consistently in line with reverse repo inflows per Article 425(2)(d): 0% for assets listed under Article 416(1)(a), (1)(b) and (1)(c) At least 15% for assets listed reported under Article 416(1)(d) 100% for any other asset not qualifying under Article 416(1)

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_355
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/02/2014

Discounts on balance sheet exposures purchased when not in default

In Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) Article 159 it states: "......Discounts on balance sheet exposures purchased when in default in accordance with Article 166(1) shall be treated in the same manner as specific credit risk adjustments." In respect of this how should one treat discounts on purchased exposures that were not in default at the time of purchase and discounts that were not calculated on single exposure level, but instead calculated on a whole portfolio of exposures which are not in default.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_354
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/04/2014

Error on ID / Template C01.00 - Own Funds (CA1), row 780

Why row 780 has not the same ID between Excel file (Annex I - Own funds templates) and Word file (Annex II - Own funds) ?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_349
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Derivatives reporting in stable funding

On page 9 (2.1 - 6) it is stated that the derivatives payables and receivables is to be reported according to regulatory netting rules, not accounting rules, (applicable for both categories), which means that the summation of the categories are not going to be neither the same, nor add up to the total assets. Please clarify the amount to be reported for derivatives, and how the control for templates 60 and 61 will work.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_348
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/02/2014

Distribution in columns 040-070 in Geographical Breakdown

Are the columns 040-070 memorandum items in the same way (the figure should be reported where the obligors would have been reported if those exposures were not in assigned to “in default”) that column 020 is?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_347
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Memorandum items in credit risk SA

Can you please confirm that the memorandum items in row 290-320 only should be filled in within exposure classes mentioned under point 54 (annex II, 3.2.1) and the Total template? I.e. that those rows should be empty in the exposure classes “in default” and "secured by immovable property”.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_346
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Allocating the FX differences as a result of subsidiaries' consolidation

Table 46 requires the reconciliation of opening and closing balances for equity account, which is also a requirement under IFRS. Usually banks with foreign subsidiary operations have a separate line item in the IFRS reconciliation reporting to record the effects of FX reconversion of the subsidiaries. The line to account for the FX difference is missing in FINREP table 46. Where should FX differences be reported?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_345
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Reporting of "instrument-by-instrument"

In table F 40.2, Annex III, the group structure should be reported instrument-by-instrument. Clarifications are needed in relation to the definition of "instrument" in the contest of Group Structure (i.e. tabel 40). Is FINREP requiring information related to each security (independently on whether the security is trading) which is held by the reporting entity at reference date?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_344
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/03/2014

Definition of SME

SMEs are defined by turnover alone (EUR 50 million according to OJ L 124, 20.05.2003). Our question concerns when turnover is recorded. Is it (i) at inception of the loan or (ii) on an on-going basis? We would also like to know what level of documentation/proof is required, if any.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_343
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 31/01/2014

FinRep table 5 row 010 column 030 - On demand [call] and short notice [current account]

Annex V indicates that balances receivable on demand classified as "cash and cash balances at central banks" shall also be reported in this template. This statement is supported by the validation rules stating that {F 01.01, r040, c010} = {F 5.00, r010, c030} (though only relating to other demand deposits). However, amounts in table 5 should be equal to tables 4.1 through 4.4 regarding loans and advances. This reasoning is indirectly supported by the following logical reasoning: If {F 01.01, r040, c010} = {F 5.00, r010, c030} AND if {F 01.01, r040, c010} has a detailed breakdown in table 4 as stated in Annex III, then there should be a link between table 4 and { F 5.00, r010, c030}. In which table (4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4) should cash and cash balances be included? Validation rules regarding these templates don't seem to include cash and cash balances at central banks.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_341
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/03/2014

Reporting of investments in subsidiaries that are not included in the prudential scope consolidation.

Annex V states that dividend income from subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures which are outside the scope of consolidation shall be reported within "Share of profit or (-) loss of investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates". Based on this statement we need clarification regarding the line in which the investments in subsidiaries that are not included in the prudential scope of consolidated should be reported in the balance sheet. Annex V p1.12 states with regard to accounting portfolios that "these aggregations do not include investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates [...]." Example: A subsidiary is not included in the prudential scope of consolidation and should therefore be included in the IAS category "Available for sale". Should the carrying amount of this investment be reported in line item F 01.01, r140, c010 or in line item F 01.01, r260, c010? If it needs to be included in line item F 01.01, r260, c010: How should those investments be measured according to IFRS at the reporting date (at cost vs. at fair value)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_340
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 04/04/2014

Link between table 1.1 and tables 4.1 to 4.4

"The link between table 1.1, ""cash balances at central banks"" and ""other demand"" deposits"" and tables ""4.1 to 4.4"" is not clear to us. (1) On the one hand, table 1.1, line 30 (""cash balances at central banks"") and line 40 (""other demand deposits""), have a detailed breakdown in table 4 according to Annex III. (2) On the other hand, Annex V (part I.12) states that “accounting portfolios”, meaning financial instruments aggregated by valuation rules, as they are delineated in tables 4.1 to 4.4, do not include ""cash and cash balances at central bank"". This statement is supported by the missing rules between table 1.1, line 30 and line 40 and table 4. In our opinion, these two facts represent a contradiction."

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_339
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Financial guarantees received reported in table 9.2 and table 13.1

Should Financial Guarantees recieved reported in table 13.1 equal financial guarantees in table 9.2?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_338
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 14/03/2014

Reporting thresholds - entry and exit criteria

Institution shall start reporting information subject to thresholds from the next reporting reference date where they have exceeded the threshold on two consecutive reporting reference dates. Is our understanding correct that if an institution exceeded the thresholds as of December 31 an September 30 the first reporting should be submitted for the reference date December 31? Institutions may stop reporting information subject to thresholds from the next reporting reference date where they have fallen below the relevant thresholds on three consecutive reporting reference dates. Based on the same methodology we assume that if an institution has fallen below the thresholds as of December 31, September 30 and June 30 no reporting is required as of December 31. Is our understanding correct?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_337
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Other
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Security code if no ISIN code available

If there are no ISIN code or other public codes that uniquely identifies the instrument, what should then be filled in in table F 40.2 column 010?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_336
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014

Reporting of entity level

In table F 40.01, Annex III, the group structure should be reported entity-by-entity. Question: What is the level of detail required in this table? Approach 1: only subsidiaries Approach 2: subsidiaries of subsidiaries (i.e. all companies in the group) Example: Group XYZ comprises Parent A which owns sub-group B and subgroup C. Both subgroup B and C are part of the CRR base of consolidation. Should the Group XYZ report in table 40.01 only the first level of subsidiary in subgroup B and C (I.e. parent company of sub-groups B and C) or also all companies owned by sub-group B and C?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_334
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 07/03/2014