Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Small bank: bail-in or liquidation

Should the resolution authority assess the possibility of bail-in even for a small non-systemically important institution without critical function before making a decision about liquidation?Please specify whether in the scope of Article 31(2)(e) "client funds and client assets" should be included also moneys of bank's depositor (creditor) exceeding the covered deposit?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2191
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 26/10/2018

Wrong validation rule v2855_m

Is a netting of repurchase agreements with securities lending needed in Asset Encumbrance?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2015_2190
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

Final valuation lower than the initial valuation

What are the consequences of final valuation being lower than the initial one?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2187
  • Topic: Valuation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Same valuer for provisional and final valuation

Can the resolution authority outsource the provisional valuation? If yes can the same valuer prepare provisional and final valuation?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2186
  • Topic: Valuation
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 28/10/2016

Clarification on the role of the special manager in resolution

We seek clarification on the role of the special manager in resolution as set out in Article 35 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD). This appears to overlap with the role of the temporary administrator as defined in Article 29.Also, is the special manager referred to in Article 35 BRRD a separate institution from that mentioned in Article 72(1) or only its special case?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2185
  • Topic: Special management
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Liability in the context of special management

In the case of special management, is the resolution authority liable for the acts of the special manager that the former had appointed and / or is the appointed special manager directly liable for their acts?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2184
  • Topic: Special management
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Resolution authorities in the function of special manager

Is it possible for resolution authorities to perform simultaneously the function of "special manager" of an authority mentioned in Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) under the assumption, that in accordance with national law it can perform the "insolvency management" function mentioned in Article 35(8) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2183
  • Topic: Special management
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Interaction between the State aid framework and the application of resolution actions

Could you please clarify the interaction of the State aid framework and the application of resolution actions in the context of Article 34 (3) and Recital 47 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2182
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 10/03/2017

Application of the NCWO principle

Regarding to the no-creditor-worse-off principle as referred to in Article 34(1)(g) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) - does it apply to write down and conversion as well? Or only to the use of resolution tools?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2181
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:

Resolution action with regard to a holding

When can a resolution action be taken with regard to a holding according to Article 33(4) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD): are the conditions individual or cumulative?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2180
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:

Clarifications regarding the scope of application of Article 33

Can you please clarify Article 33 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD); as a whole, we interpret it to mean that the special rule for Financial Institutions should apply only to Financial Institutions that are not parents in accordance with Article 1(1)(c) or (d), but are subsidiaries of a credit institution or an investment firm. Is this correct?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2179
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 11/11/2016

Clarification on the applicable framework for public recapitalisation

We would like clarification on the applicable framework for public recapitalisation which is not classified as precautionary recapitalisation accordingly to Article 32(4)(d)(iii) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), in particular i) its relation to Government Financial Stabilisation Tools, and ii) differences in rules applicable in 2015 and from 2016 onwards.

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2178
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/12/2016

Determination made by competent authority

Must the “determination made by competent authority”, mentioned in Article 32(1)(a) of the Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), be enshrined in a formal decision of the competent authority?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2177
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Declaration of insolvency / bankruptcy

When the entity is failing or likely to fail and the public interest condition referred to in Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) is not fulfilled, who is supposed to take initiative for the purpose of the entity’s bankruptcy motion? How do the determination under Article 82(2) BRRD and the assessment of resolvability under Articles 15 and 16 BRRD relate to each other?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2176
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Clarification on formal decision

Should the determination to be made by the resolution authority under Articles 32(1), 32a and 33 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) on whether the conditions for resolution are met be enshrined in a formal decision? If so, should the latter be a separate decision from the decision on the actions to take?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2175
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Determination the failure of an institution

If, when performing the valuation under Article 36 of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), the resolution authority finds that the conditions for resolution or for the write down or conversion of capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59 are not met, can it ‘reverse’ the competent authority’s determination that the institution is failing or likely to fail?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2174
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Stating in law that banks’ activities are always in the public interest

Is it compliant with Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) if the national transposition measure provides that it is always in the public interest to take resolution action in relation to all credit institutions?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2173
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 21/01/2022

Coverage of further losses following bail-in

Can it be clarified as to whether in cases where there has been bail-in of at least 8% of the total liabilities, and on all liabilities other than liabilities excluded by Article 44(2) the settlement financing scheme (or alternative financing sources in accordance with Article 44(7)) cannot make a contribution if the liabilities has not been excluded under Article 44(3)? This also seems to follow from Article 101(1)(c).How are further losses covered? The guarantee scheme can only provide limited funds in accordance with Article 109(5).

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2172
  • Topic: Resolution objectives and triggers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/12/2016

FINREP - Contents of template F 40.1 Group structure "entity-by-entity" - Col 160 "Carrying amount" should be higher than 0

Template F40.01 requires carrying amount higher than 0. As a principle of consolidation, enterprises over which the Group exercises significant influence (associates) are accounted for by the equity method. If the Group’BNP Paribas'share of losses of an equity-method entity equals or exceeds the carrying amount of its investment in this entity, the Group discontinues including its share of further losses. The investment is reported at nil value ans respect in this case the control in FINREP template 40.1 concerning the carrying amount. But the Group BNP Paribas consolidated also controlled but non material entities under equity method. In these cases the carrying amount is not reported at nil, due to the fact that the Group is fully involved in the entity. Is it possible to modifiy the control to authorize negative carrying amount under the condition that a comment is reported in a dedicated cell?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 530/2014 - RTS on materiality of thresholds for internal approaches to specific risk in the trading book
  • ID: 2015_2170
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/12/2019

Treatment of Eligible CRM CDS for Leverage Ratio

Should credit derivatives subject to the CRR Article 273(3) which have zero exposure value for counterparty credit risk purposes also be treated as having zero value for the Leverage ratio exposure measure under CRR Article 429c(1)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/62 - DR with regard to the leverage ratio
  • ID: 2015_2165
  • Topic: Leverage ratio
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/05/2016