Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2019_4906 Interaction between total MREL and subordinated “eight percent TLOF” requirement
Question ID
2019_4906
Legal act
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Topic
MREL
Article
45b
Paragraph
4
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
-
Name of institution / submitter
French Treasury
Country of incorporation / residence
France
Type of submitter
Competent authority
Subject matter
Interaction between total MREL and subordinated “eight percent TLOF” requirement
Question

Article 45b(4) requires, for GSIIs and top tier banks, that “a part of” the total MREL requirement “equal to” eight percent of total liabilities, including own funds (TLOF), subject to possible upwards or downwards adjustments, is to be met with own funds and subordinated instruments (hereafter referred as “the subordination requirement”). How does this subordination requirement and its calibration interact with the methodology set out in Article 45c for determining the total MREL requirement? If the requirement resulting from the application of the methodology set out in Article 45c happens to be lower than 8% TLOF, subject to possible upwards or downwards adjustments, is that subordination requirement capped by the total MREL requirement?

Background on the question

Article 45b(4) BRRD2 provides that “resolution authorities shall ensure that a part of the requirement referred to in Article 45e equal to eight percent of the total liabilities, including own funds, shall be met by resolution entities that are G-SIIs or resolution entities that are subject to Article 45c(5) or (6) [top tier banks] using own funds, subordinated eligible instruments, or liabilities as referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article.” This subordination requirement for GSIIs and top tiers banks is subject to possible upwards adjustments (45b(7)) or downwards adjustments (45b(4)) under certain conditions. The “requirement referred to in Article 45e”, i.e. the total MREL requirement, is calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Article 45c. This article provides that the MREL requirement should consist of a recapitalisation amount and a loss absorption amount and does not consider the subordination requirement set out in Article 45b. As such, the total MREL requirement calculated according to Article 45c may therefore, perfectly be lower (or higher) than the 8% TLOF possibly adjusted upwards or downward mentioned in Article 45b. If the total MREL requirement is higher than the subordination requirement, the situation is straightforward. However, if the total MREL requirement is lower than the subordination requirement, which requirement should prevail? Please note that during the political negotiations, in November 2018 under the Austrian presidency, one delegation suggested to introduce an additional paragraph in Article 45b(9) explicitly stating that the subordinated 8% TLOF requirement should prevail over the formula for calculating the total MREL requirement. The Council decided to reject this amendment. In the final text of the directive, the subordination requirement (8% TLOF possibly adjusted up or down) is only construed as “a part of” the total MREL requirement, obviously defining the former as a subset of the latter. The political intention, clearly set out in the directive, is that the total MREL requirement calculated following the Article 45c methodology prevail over the subordination requirement set out in Article 45b, which is only a portion of the former. If the total MREL requirement resulting from the application of the methodology set out in Article 45c happens to be lower than 8% TLOF (possibly adjusted upwards or downwards), the directive contains no provision forcing an increase of the total requirement in order to make it higher than 8% TLOF (possibly adjusted upwards or downwards). The actual amount to be met using own funds and subordinated instruments would thus in that case be equal to the total MREL requirement of the entity, without however increasing this total requirement so that it reaches 8% TLOF(possibly adjusted upwards or downwards).

Submission date
09/09/2019
Rejected publishing date
11/02/2022
Rationale for rejection

Please note that as part of adjustments to the Single Rulebook Q&A process, agreed by the EBA and the European Commission, it has been decided to reject outstanding questions submitted before 1 January 2020, when the Q&A process was updated as part of the last ESAs Review. In particular, the question that you have submitted has now regrettably been rejected and will not be addressed.

If you believe your question would still benefit from clarification, you are invited to resubmit your question, adapting it to reflect any legislative, regulatory or other relevant developments that may have occurred since the initial date of submission. The EBA will aim to address resubmitted questions as a matter of priority. When considering to resubmit, you are kindly requested to observe the updated admissibility criteria agreed in the context of the adjustment of the Q&A process, available in the Additional background and guidance for asking questions. We hope for your understanding.

For further information please refer to the press release and the updated Q&A page.

Status
Rejected question

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive