This site uses cookies. Visit our cookies policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.

Accept all cookies Accept only essential cookies
Skip to main content
European Banking Authority logo
  • Extranet
  • Log in
  • About us
    Back

    About us

    The EBA is an independent EU Authority.  We play a key role in safeguarding the integrity and robustness of the EU banking sector to support financial stability in the EU.

    Learn more
      • Mission, values and tasks
      • Organisation and governance
        • Governance structure and decision making
        • EBA within the EU institutional framework
        • Internal organisation
        • Accountability
      • Legal and policy framework
        • EBA regulation and institutional framework
        • Compliance with EBA regulatory products
      • Sustainable EBA
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Careers
        • Vacancies
        • Meet our team
      • Budget
      • Procurement
    Close menu panel
  • Activities
    Back

    Activities

    To contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system, the EBA develops harmonised rules for financial institutions, promotes convergence of supervisory practices, monitors, and advises on the impact of financial innovation and the transition to sustainable finance.

    Start here
      • Single Rulebook
      • Implementing Basel III in Europe
      • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory convergence
        • Supervisory disclosure
        • Peer Reviews
        • Mediation
        • Breach of Union Law
        • Colleges
        • Training
      • Direct supervision and oversight
        • Markets in Crypto-assets
        • Digital operational resilience Act
      • Information for consumers
        • National competent authorities for consumer protection
        • How to complain
        • Personal finance at the EU level
        • Warnings
        • Financial education
        • National registers and national authorities responsible for handling complaints related to credit servicers
        • Frauds and scams
      • Research Workshops
      • Ad hoc activities
        • Our response to Covid-19
        • Brexit
    Close menu panel
  • Risk and data analysis
    Back

    Risk and data analysis

    To ensure the orderly functioning and stability of the financial system in the European Union, we monitor and analyse risks and vulnerabilities relevant for the regulation of banks and investment firms. We also facilitate information sharing among authorities and institutions through supervisory reporting and data disclosure.

    Learn more
      • Risk analysis
        • 2024 EU wide transparency exercise
        • EU-wide stress testing
        • Risk monitoring
        • Thematic analysis
      • Remuneration and diversity analysis
      • Reporting frameworks
        • Reporting Time Traveller
        • DPM data dictionary
      • Data
        • Registers and other list of institutions
        • Guides on data
        • Aggregate statistical data
        • Secondary reporting: data from Competent Authorities to the EBA
        • Data analytics tools
    Close menu panel
  • Publications and media
    Back

    Publications and media

    Communicating to all our audiences in the most effective way and using the most appropriate channels is crucial for us. Through our publications, announcements, and participation in external events, we are committed to reaching out to all our stakeholders to report about our policies, activities, and initiatives.

    Learn more
      • Publications
        • Guidelines
        • Regulatory Technical Standards
        • Implementing Technical Standards
        • Reports
        • Consultation papers
        • Opinions
        • Decisions
        • Staff papers
        • Annual reports
      • Press releases
      • Speeches
      • Interviews
      • Events
      • Media centre
        • Media gallery
        • Media resources
    Close menu panel

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Single Rulebook Q&A
  3. 2024_7242 Application of recognised SyRB on a consolidated basis
Question ID
2024_7242
Legal act
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Topic
Other issues
Article
133, 134
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Not applicable
Article/Paragraph
/
Name of institution / submitter
National Bank of Belgium
Country of incorporation / residence
Belgium
Type of submitter
Competent authority
Subject matter
Application of recognised SyRB on a consolidated basis
Question

May or shall a competent or a designated authority from a Member State, that recognises a systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State in accordance with Article 133 of the CRD, require its domestically authorised institutions to apply that rate on a consolidated basis, covering all exposures targeted by the recognised systemic risk buffer held through subsidiaries, branches or through cross-border lending, in accordance with Article 134 of the CRD ? Does the legal framework permit or require that exposures of domestically authorised institutions held through subsidiaries located in the Member State that sets the buffer rate as well as in other Member States are also included in the scope of recognition? 

Background on the question

The CRD allows a Member State that recognises a systemic risk buffer (SyRB) to apply the SyRB rate set by another Member State, to domestically authorised institutions, for exposures located in the Member State that sets that rate. In accordance with Article 134(5) of the CRD, Member States that set a SyRB may also ask the ESRB to issue a recommendation as referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 to one or more Member States which may recognise the SyRB rate. The ESRB Recommendation on voluntary reciprocity ESRB/2015/2 was issued to support effective macroprudential policy in Europe and to set out the procedure for voluntary recognition of measures such as the SyRB, measures under Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and other national measures that have not been harmonised under Union law. 

Authorities have to decide whether and how to recognise a macroprudential measure activated in another Member State. Recently, due to different views regarding the interpretation of  the relevant CRD provisions, the question arose as to whether competent or designated authorities in a Member State that recognised a systemic risk buffer, may require domestically authorised parent institutions to comply with the recognised SyRB rate set by another Member State on a consolidated basis, thereby including the exposures held by their subsidiaries established in the activating Member State.

Article 133(4) of the CRD states that the relevant competent or designated authority, as applicable, may require institutions to maintain a SyRB on an individual, consolidated, or sub-consolidated basis. With regard to the recognition of a SyRB doubts were raised whether, as Article 134 of the CRD does not give any guidance on the level of consolidation of a recognised SyRB rate, Article 133(4) of the CRD is also applicable when recognising a SyRB set by authorities of another Member State.

By not recognising macroprudential requirements at the highest level of consolidation (group level), namely excluding the exposures held by subsidiaries in the Member State that sets the buffer rate, systemic risks which may have an unwarranted impact on the resilience of banking groups are not taken into account and competition in the internal market may also be distorted. First, a banking group may not only be exposed to a macroprudential or systemic risk in another Member State through branches and direct cross-border activity but also through its subsidiaries, as the parent institutions may be effectively obliged to ensure the adequate capitalisation of their subsidiaries or to absorb losses incurred by their subsidiaries. If the scope of reciprocation does not include macroprudential requirements applied to subsidiaries in the Member State that sets the buffer rate, systemic or macroprudential risks from those exposures may not be reflected in the consolidated loss-absorbing requirements of the parent institution in the home country.

As an example, consider bank A authorised in Member State X with a subsidiary B authorised in Member State Y that has introduced a SyRB. The SyRB in Member State Y applies to domestically authorised institutions on a consolidated basis. Bank A has the following exposures which are potentially relevant for the recognition of the SyRB set by Member State Y:

  • through branches and direct lending in Member State Y:              100 EUR

  • through subsidiary B authorised in Member State Y:                       500 EUR

When the macroprudential authority in country Y asks for reciprocity for the SyRB, and the macroprudential authority in country X decides to reciprocate, a question arises whether the measure should apply (i) only to bank A’s exposures through branches and direct lending (100 EUR), or (ii) also to Bank A’s exposures through the subsidiary (500 EUR). If not applied on a consolidated basis, the recognition of the SyRB would cover only the exposures of bank A held through branches and direct lending in Member State Y, i.e. 100 EUR. In other words, bank A in Member State X would not be subject to any capital requirement on a consolidated basis for its exposures to systemic or macroprudential risk in Member State Y incurred via its subsidiary B (amounting to 500 EUR). Hence, bank A would face a lower capital requirement at group level than if the exposures had instead been held through branches or direct lending in country Y and a lower consolidated capital requirement than when both parent and subsidiary were authorised in Member State Y. In addition, such discrepancies might trigger strategic asset allocation decisions within groups amplifying abovementioned issues in terms of loss absorbing capacity at consolidated level.

Moreover, if the authorities in Member State X were not able to require the application of the recognised SyRB of Member State Y on a consolidated basis and on the basis of all exposures held by a banking group irrespective of the legal status and location of the intragroup financial service provider that holds the respective exposure, there would be no authority in the internal market able to impose such a requirement, as the authorities of Member State Y clearly have no jurisdiction over a banking group authorised in Member State X. As a result, it would not be possible, within the internal market, to ensure an equal treatment of banking groups operating only within Member States and banking groups operating across borders.

Not applying a recognising measure at the same level of consolidation could thus distort competition in the internal market and result in insufficient resilience of banking groups that do not apply a SyRB recognising a SyRB in another Member State on a consolidated basis. The ESRB therefore started to specify in its Recommendations amending Recommendation ESRB/2015/2 whether Member States should recognise another Member States’ macroprudential measure on an individual basis, on a sub-consolidated basis, and/or on a consolidated basis (at group level). It has done so, for the first time, in Recommendation ESRB/2023/13 in relation to national measures activated by Denmark and Portugal and in Recommendation ESRB/2024/2 on the recognition of the Italian SyRB, by  recommending Member States to recognise the respective measure by applying it also on a consolidated basis, hence also including exposures through subsidiaries. The implementation of those Recommendations would ensure that capital requirements at the group level are adequate in view of the systemic or macroprudential risks to which the parent is exposed through its subsidiaries. 

Against this background, clarification is sought through the Single Rulebook Q&A tool, whether the current legal framework of the CRD permits national authorities to require the application of recognised macroprudential measures also on a consolidated basis. Such a requirement would be in line with Article 133(4) of the CRD, which states that a SyRB can be applied on an individual, sub-consolidated or consolidated basis. 

Submission date
06/11/2024
Status
Question under review
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the European Commission because it is a matter of interpretation of Union law.

Footer

EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY

Our mission is to contribute to the stability and effectiveness of the European financial system through simple, consistent, transparent, fair regulation and supervision that benefits all EU citizens.


UE logoAn agency of the EU

EU Agencies Network logoEU Agencies Network

EMAS logoSustainable EBA

Contact us

  • Contacts
  • Ask a general question
  • Send a press query
  • Ask a regulatory question
  • File a complaint
  • Whistleblower reports

Stay up to date with our work

  • Subscribe to our email alerts
  • News & press RSS feed

Follow us on Social media

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

Find out about us

  • The EBA at a glance
  • Vacancies
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice
  • Cookies policy
  • Frauds and scams

Explore related sites

  • EIOPA
  • ESMA
  • ESRB
  • CEBS archive