Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Concentration risk - type of counterparty

We understand that the purpose of column 70 in table C27 is to identify institutions/unregulated financial sector entities We understand (EBA 2013-395) that if the parent co of a group of connected clients qualifies as institution (or unregulated financial sector entity), all the clients of the family should be reported be institutions or not, be unregulated financial sector entity or not. --> should all the clients of a group of connected being institutions bear the same type of counterparty in C27 column 70? --> should we fill in the type of conterparty only when the group of connected client institutions/unregulated financial institutions is part of the 10 largest exposures on institutions and/or unregulated financial sector entities

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1058
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 30/10/2015

Maturity used in IRB RWA calculations

Is there an error in this paragraph? It currently says "....shall calculate M for each of these exposures as set out in points (a) to (e)....."; should this read "as set out in points (a) to (f)" in order to be consistent with the previous version of the legislation. Based on the current wording the effect of this is to exclude the possibility of banks using a residual maturity ".....M shall be the maximum remaining time (in years) that the obligor is permitted to take to fully discharge its contractual obligations,......"

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_762
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2015

Financial Customer Definition - application to captive finance companies within non-financial corporate groups

Article 411(1) stipulates that “'financial customer' means a customer that performs one or more of the activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2013/36/EU as its main business”. We are seeking clarity as to whether captive finance companies (“captives”) are captured by this section of the financial customer definition where they are part of a wider non-financial corporate group.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_364
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2015

Definition of retail deposits.

Can the EBA confirm that retail bonds (both retail and small business) can be treated as retail deposits?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_288
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2015

CIUs

Where an institution consists of a parent bank and two subsidiaries does the EUR 500 million cap on CIUs apply to consolidated group or can it apply to each of the legal entities? In the latter case this would imply the consolidated group could count up to EUR 1500 million CIU.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_292
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2015

Inconsistency between validation rule v0620_m from Annex XV (Validation Formulae) and the hierarchy definition for TR1 in template C 21.00

According to the Validation formulae (Annexe XV) v0620_m for COREP report C 21.00 – Market risk: Standardised Approach for position risk in equities, {r010, c060} is the total of own funds requirements for General Risk, Specific risk, Particular Approach for position risk in CIUs and Other non-delta risks for options. For ‘Type of risk’ dimension categorization in {r080,c060} - Particular Approach for position risk in CIUs, the member is ‘Market not look-through CIUs risk’. But, according to TR1 hierarchy, this member is not included in the hierarchy for ‘Equity risk’ member. This results in inconsistency between the hierarchy definition and the validation formulae specified. The numbers do not add up naturally as expected in the validation rule.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_788
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 23/10/2015

Limitation of a transfer to a certain period of time

Is it possible to limit a transfer under Article 38 (6) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) to a certain period of time following the initial transfer?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2358
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 16/10/2015

Expenses in the context of Article 37 (7)

What kind of costs does the term "expenses" in Article 37 (7) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) refer to?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2356
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 16/10/2015

Appointment of management body of a bridge institution

Can the resolution authority appoint the first management body of the bridge institution at the time of its creation? Should the resolution authority appoint a temporary management body until the shareholders can meet and decide on the institution’s management body?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2314
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 16/10/2015

Authorisation of the bridge institution

Could the bridge institution also be a simple holding company instead of an authorised institution (authorised in accordance with Directive 2013/36/EU or Directive 2014/65/EU, as applicable)?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2315
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Referencing in Article 41

Should the reference made to paragraph 4 with regard to “the period” mentioned in Article 41 (2) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) not be towards paragraph 5?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_2313
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Inclusion of insurance undertakings in prudential consolidation

Should an insurance undertaking be included in prudential consolidation according to Art. 18 of CRR?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_383
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Classification of credit unions

Should the loans to credit unions (eg. Spoldzielcze Kasy Oszczednosciowo Kredytowe in Poland) be presented under category "Credit institutions" or as "Other financial corporations"?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1507
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Row 030 C07.00 reported also for exposure class of protection provider

Should the part of the "eligible" SME exposure according to Article 501 CRR that is secured with e.g. guarantee be reported in the row 030 (C07.00) in the exposure class of the guarantor and also be subject to the supporting factor?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1419
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Definition of threshold

Definition of threshold. Should bonds be considered in the calculation of the 1mln/€ threshold?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_289
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

CoRep 12 and 13 - Validation rules v0508_m, v0514_m, v0532_m and v0538_m

The validation rules v0508_m and v0514_m for C 12.00 cannot be true at the same time in case there is any exposure subject to Look-Through or Internal Assesment Approach (breakdown of outstanding positionsaccording to CQS at inception is not applicable in these cases). The same applies for rules v0532_m and v0538_m for C 13.00 in case of Look-Through, Internal Assesment Approach or Supervisory Formula Method.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1231
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Validations

The validation rule v2863_m {F 32.04.a, r140,c010} <= {F 09.02, r080,c010} is incorrect as per the background on this question. Please can the rule be deleted.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1066
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Asset Encumbrance
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Transferred financial assets, Template 15, validation rules for column 10

Assume a scenario where an institution has long and short positions for the same CUSIP and presents a net asset on the face of its IFRS balance sheet (and, similarly, in FINREP template 1.1). In the situation where the long position serves as a collateral under institution’s Repo obligation, what amounts shall be reported in Template 15 column 10 – amount of long position that is associated with Repo obligation or a net asset for this CUSIP (i.e. the difference between long and short position) as reported on the face of balance sheet (Template 1.1)? If long positions are to be reported, do the implications of the validation rules v0897_m - v0909_m for Template 15, column 10 lead to reporting a number different from that intended?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1032
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Template 43 Provisions, columns 040 and 060

In the UK, banks currently have a number of customer redress provisions. These are provisions to return customers to the financial position they would have been in if they hadn't been unfairly disadvantaged by past banking practices. Determining whether customers have been unfairly disadvantaged and are thus due redress is overseen by the conduct regulator in the UK, the FCA. As well as this, all individual cases can be arbitrated if necessary by a consumer protection body, the Financial Ombudsman Service. In terms of who obliges the banks to pay out redress, it is these regulatory bodies. Their authority derives from legislation. Conversely, banks have established constructive obligations (in IAS 37 terms) to pay redress to their customers by industry practice, and by the communications they have sent to those customers. Looking at template 43, there is no column in the template for provisions arising from regulatory obligations, so we believe we have to choose between classifying these provisions in 040 "Pending Legal Issues and Tax Litigation", or 060 "Other Provisions". We believe that it is possible to consider these regulatory obligations as either "Pending Legal Issues and Tax Litigation" given the IAS 37 definition of "legal obligation" implied by the template, or conversely as "Other Provisions" because of the constructive obligations in effect.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1027
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015

Exit Criteria NPE

The exit criteria described in No. 157 “shall apply in addition to the criteria applied by reporting institutions for impaired and defaulted exposures”. Does that pose any further requirement other than ‘the exposure is not in default’ and ‘the exposure is not impaired’?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1017
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 02/10/2015