Search for Q&As

Enquirers can use various factors to search for a Q&A:

  • These include searching by the Q&A ID; legal reference, date submitted, technical standard / guideline, or by keyword if known.
  • Searches can be extended to more than one legal act, topic, technical standard or guidelines by making multiple selections (i.e. pressing 'Ctrl' on your keyboard, and selecting the relevant ones from the drop-down lists by left mouse-click).

Disclaimer:

Q&As refer to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.

Please note that the Q&As related to the supervisory benchmarking exercises have been moved to the dedicated handbook page. You can submit Q&As on this topic here.

Final Q&As Q&As under review Rejected Q&As Archived Q&As All Q&As

List of Q&A's

Large Exposures - maturity buckets

Is it possible to report negative amounts in some maturity buckets of the exposure in LE4 and LE5 templates? According to the validation rules, every column in template LE4 and LE5 should be larger than or equal to zero.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1455
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

The approach that AMA credit institutions should use when determining the relevant indicator in order to fill in C 16.00 – Operational risk template.

Which is the approach that AMA credit institutions should use when computing the relevant indicator that should be reported in line 130 columns 010-030 of the C 16.00 – Operational risk template?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_1448
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Reporting of 10 largest exposures to institutions (correct counting in a case where 2 clients in a group of connected clients are institutions)

How should an institution count "top 10 exposures to institutions" in a case of an exposure to a group of connected clients in which an institution is a parent and there are at least 2 institutions in this group? a) As 1 (of 10) exposure to institutions – because a group of connected clients counts as one exposure when counting top 10 (no matter how many institutions there are in this group) b) As 2 (of 10) exposures to institutions - because there are two institutions in the group of connected clients with a parent institution.

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1366
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Table 11.1 - notional amount of derivatives used in two hedge relationshops (fair value and cash flow hedges)

Reporting of notional amount of derivative in more than one hedge relationship: If a derivative (e.g. cross currency swap) is used in two hedging relationships (fair value hedge and cash flow hedge), how should the notional amount of the cross currency swap be reported in Table 11.1? Should the notional of the derivative be reported: a) only once- allocated to one hedge relationship b) reported two times (double reporting)- in both hedge relationship types c) allocated and reported in both hedge relatioship types

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_944
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Scope of deposit monopoly

According to Article 9(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD), only credit institutions can carry on the business of taking deposits or other repayable funds from the "public". Will the operation of a group account arrangement within an industrial group - which, inter alia, requires a subsidiary to deposit funds with its parent company - breach the deposit monopoly in Article 9(1) of the CRD? The purpose of such a deposit requirement is generally to optimise the liquidity management within the group. The arrangement only applies to subsidiaries within the group.

  • Legal act: Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1626
  • Topic: Other issues
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 13/03/2015

Leasing: Residual value risk

In the calculation of the exposure value for residual value risk of leased assets, is the "residual value" that has to be multiplied with 1/t (a) the residual value on the date of calculation / the reporting date or (b) the estimated residual value at the end of the lease term?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1241
  • Topic: Credit risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/03/2015

Handling of unrealised gains/losses in Own Funds and Exposures

Does unrealised gains/losses refer to all gains and losses for financial instruments accounted at fair value which occured life to date or only unrealised gains/losses of the current year? Will unrealised gaines and losses despite being deducted from own funds be still part of the exposure? How should the position "Losses for the current financial year" be calculated? Without taking into account unrealised gains/losses?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_716
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/03/2015

Reporting "type of connection" in column 040 of LE3 (C 29.00)

What type of connection should an institution report for Client A if "Client A" in a group of connected clients controls "Client B" (cotrol relationship - "a") and is additional economically connected with "Client C" (interconnectedness - "b")?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2013_683
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 27/02/2015

Statement of profit or loss

Can you please clarify what is required by the Annex V guidance on this data point? Two parts of paragraph 24 (the reference given in the template) appear to be inconsistent. The phrase "May be reported" suggests that there is an option about whether or not to classify derivates Held For Trading in this data point, whereas "shall be included" suggests that the income and expense must be shown within interest income and expense, and therefore must be included in this data point 020 or data point 100 for any expense. Further, can you clarify how this paragraph 24 of Annex V relates to paragraph 21? Paragraph 24 is not given as a reference for this data point, but appears to be applicable as it applies to financial instruments Held For Trading. It strongly suggests that it is optional whether to include gains or losses from such instruments within Interest Income/ Expense or Gains and Losses. -------------

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting of Institutions
  • ID: 2014_1000
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 27/02/2015

Aggregate Liabilities

Where wholesale funding issuance is undertaken in a currency which is different to the base reporting currency of the institution, and on issuance is swapped back for the duration of the liability (therefore leaving the institution with no currency risk on the transaction), does this issuance count towards the aggregate liabilities cap for single currency reporting?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1579
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Where and how much to report forward starting repo or reverse repo ?

Should article 422.2 and 425.2(d) in CRR be applicable on the initial disbursement flow of forward starting repo or reverse repo for purpose of LCR ? Where to report initial disbursement flows and maturing flows (if within 30 days) of forward starting repo or reverse repo in report C52 and C53?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
  • ID: 2014_872
  • Topic: Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

LCR Inflows: current accounts with other credit institutions

Article 425(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) specifies that assets with an undefined contractual end date shall be taken into account with a 20% inflow provided that the contract allows the institution to withdraw and request payment within 30 days. Do current accounts held with other credit institutions fall into that category? If not, how should these current accounts be reported?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1576
  • Topic: Liquidity risk
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Short positions in financial institution capital instruments

(1) Where a bank holds an item which is treated as a financial institution capital instrument under CRR, can a guarantee or credit default swap over that instrument be considered a short position for the purposes of Articles 45(a), 59(a) or 69(a)? (2) Where a bank has an indirect holding of a financial institution capital instrument, can a guarantee or credit default swap over the host item be considered a short position in the underlying capital instrument for the purposes of Articles 45(a), 59(a) or 69(a)?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1382
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Inclusion of interim profits / Deduction of losses in own funds

1. How should the interim profits be calculated for the purposes of inclusion in own funds? E.g. if the bank has monthly P/L as follows: Jan -10, Feb -20, March +100 (Year-to-date +70). The results are not verified by external audit. Should the bank take deduct the losses from Jan and Feb, but ignore the March gain as it is unaudited (capital impact compared to IFRS equity -100) or can the losses be netted with the gains and the YTD gain (unaudited) be filtered out (capital impact -70)? 2. What constitutes 'adequate level of assurance' in context of verification by external auditors? Is a full audit required or is an interim review sufficient?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_384
  • Topic: Own funds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Exemption of purchased receivables from Aricle 405's retention requirement

Do the provisions in Article 405(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 apply to purchased receivables?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2014_1474
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Risk Retention

Can the retention requirements under Article 405 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) be satisfied by the provider of the junior/first loss funding for a CLO warehouse where such an entity has also been involved in the selection of the exposures and the setting of criteria, as it can be said, in such capacity, to be acting as "originator"? Also, where the warehouse provides financing for the acquisition of the majority of the exposures but further exposures are acquired from different sources after closing (and in accordance with pre-defined criteria), will this prevent the first loss warehouse provider from being the "originator"?

  • Legal act: Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2013_265
  • Topic: Securitisation and Covered Bonds
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 20/02/2015

Asset transfer in case of sale of business tool

What is the proper basis of transferring assets in case of sale of business tools as referred to in Article 38(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), is it the resolution authority decision or agreement?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_1778
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/02/2015

Liabilities guaranteed by third parties subject to bail-in

The provisions regarding exclusion of "secured liabilities“ from bail-in contained in in Articles 2(2)(67) and 44(2)(b) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) seem to be ambiguous. We seek clarification as to whether liabilities guaranteed by third parties can be subject to bail-in?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_1779
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/02/2015

Clarificaion of "value of an instrument" in Article 48(2)

We seek clarification regarding Article 48(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD), the provision regarding write-down and conversion powers is unclear: the value of an instrument may fluctuate therefore the reference to “value” in Article 48(2) seems ambiguous. We wonder if value refers to the “face value” (“notional amount”) or to the “market value”?

  • Legal act: Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
  • COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs: Not applicable
  • ID: 2015_1780
  • Topic: Resolution tools and powers
  • Date of submission:
  • Published as final Q&A: 06/02/2015