« Back

Banco de España

Structural representation of taxonomy changes: Respondents are asked to consider if these arrangements will in fact provide them with any benefits, or if they believe an alternative possible implementation would generally be more beneficial.
We are in favor. More detail in the attached document
Tables utilising new layout features: Since both of these are features that happened not to have appeared in the previous version of the taxonomy (although they are within the ambit of the table linkbase specification) respondents are asked to consider if these layout features will cause them implementation problems.
We are against these new layout features. More detail in the attached document
Taxonomy file version tags: Respondents’ views are sought on the relative value of each approach, or any reasonable alternative.
We are in favor of the current approach. More detail in the attached document
Introduction approach: Respondents’ opinions are sought on any practical considerations as to the date of transition to remittance under the 2.1 sub taxonomies.
Please, see detail in the document attached
General comments:
Our apologies for this late feedback. Kindest regards
Contact name
Víctor Morilla