« Back

British Bankers' Association

Structural representation of taxonomy changes: Respondents are asked to consider if these arrangements will in fact provide them with any benefits, or if they believe an alternative possible implementation would generally be more beneficial.
The BBA's has no comments.
Tables utilising new layout features: Since both of these are features that happened not to have appeared in the previous version of the taxonomy (although they are within the ambit of the table linkbase specification) respondents are asked to consider if these layout features will cause them implementation problems.
The BBA's has no comments.
Taxonomy file version tags: Respondents’ views are sought on the relative value of each approach, or any reasonable alternative.
The BBA's has no comments.
Introduction approach: Respondents’ opinions are sought on any practical considerations as to the date of transition to remittance under the 2.1 sub taxonomies.
The BBA's has no comments.
General comments:
Given the very short time frame given to respond to this paper, and the time consuming and complex nature of checking the accuracy of the DPM, our members are not in a position to provide any feedback on this occasion.
Contact name
Robert Driver