Question ID
2018_3653
Legal act
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
Article
99
Paragraph
5
COM Delegated or Implementing Acts/RTS/ITS/GLs/Recommendations
Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (repealed)
Article/Paragraph
ANNEX VIII / 1.2.Concentration of funding by counterparty (C 67.00)
Name of institution / submitter
Sopra Banking Software
Country of incorporation / residence
france
Type of submitter
Consultancy firm
Subject matter
Reporting C67 - "Concentration of funding by counterparty ", why the product coding has not evolved compared to the new EBA text ?
Question

As part of the implementation of the new ITS on reporting on the ‘Additional Monitoring Tools’ to put into production by the end of March 2018, we found that in the specifications of new taxonomies for reporting C 67.00 – ‘Concentration of funding by counterparty’, the product coding has not evolved. The new EBA text mentions the renaming of the ‘REPO’ product category to ‘SFT’ and the addition of two new categories: ‘OSWF - Other secured wholesale funding’ and ‘OFP - Other funding products’.

Why is the taxonomy not aligned with the new EBA text? 

Background on the question

Template C 67.00 – ‘Concentration of funding by counterparty’, the product coding has not evolved compared to the new EBA text.

Submission date
Final publishing date
Final answer

The DPM for version 2.7 of the reporting framework is not aligned with the instructions on column 050 (product type) of template C 67.00 (Concentration of funding by counterparty) of Annexes XVIII (template) and XIX (instructions) to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting) as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2114.

Therefore, the reporting of the product type in column 050 should, where possible, follow the codes based on the previous DPM version and the code reported shall be the code which corresponds best to the product codes provided by the new instructions; otherwise the product type shall be left empty.

More specifically,

-       the new product codes ‘SFT’ and ‘OSWF’ should be reported as ‘REPO’,

-       while in those cases where ‘OFP’ would be the most suitable product type as defined by the revised instructions, column 050 shall be left blank.

The amendment introducing the new product codes will take place in DPM version 2.8. 

Status
Final Q&A
Answer prepared by
Answer prepared by the EBA.

Disclaimer

The Q&A refers to the provisions in force on the day of their publication. The EBA does not systematically review published Q&As following the amendment of legislative acts. Users of the Q&A tool should therefore check the date of publication of the Q&A and whether the provisions referred to in the answer remain the same.